Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Themeatpopsicle

If you are creating a new request about this user, please add it to the top of the page, above this notice. Don't forget to add
{{Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Themeatpopsicle}}
to the checkuser page here. Previous requests (shown below), and this box, will be automatically hidden on Requests for checkuser (but will still appear here).

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.

Themeatpopsicle

request links: main • edit • links • history • watch
Filed: 22:44, 30 December 2008 (UTC)

Themeatpopsicle (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
Freetibet84 (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

Code letter: F

Supporting evidence: Freetibet84 was a mostly-vandalism POV-pusher. He was blocked on December 8. Themeatpopsicle showed up several days later and repeated one of Freetibet84's edits to RightChange.com (see The meatpopsicle's edit, Freetibet84's edit). They share common interests in Linux and LGBT issues and both are pushing extremely anti-Christian points of view. I believe that both are most likely the same person. I would be utterly shocked if there aren't plenty of other accounts/sleepers/whatever too - I doubt Freetibet84 was a first-time customer. --B (talk) 22:44, 30 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Likely. Same geographic location. Nishkid64 _{(Make articles, not wikidrama)} 23:09, 30 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, that's good enough for me - blocked - the editing patterns alone made it pretty much a lock anyway. --B (talk) 23:14, 30 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.
Subsequent requests related to this user should be made above, in a new section.