Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/VartanM

If you are creating a new request about this user, please add it to the top of the page, above this notice. Don't forget to add
{{Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/VartanM}}
to the checkuser page here. Previous requests (shown below), and this box, will be automatically hidden on Requests for checkuser (but will still appear here).
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.

VartanM (2nd)

request links: main • edit • links • history • watch • talk
Filed: 19:23, 29 October 2008 (UTC)

Codes: F/G Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Armenia-Azerbaijan 2

Evidence: See diffs next to each name. This concerns a slow motion, tag team edit war on Hemshin peoples. All of the accounts have been reverting to essentially the same version of the article. Before further steps are taken, I would like to know if there is technical evidence of sock puppetry. There is an appearance of sock or meat puppetry. Even if there is no technical evidence, I may yet take action based on behavior. Jehochman Talk 19:23, 29 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

information Note: see related ANI thread where this 66.x IP appears, [10] — Rlevse • Talk • 23:58, 29 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Red X Unrelated VartanM (talk · contribs)

 Confirmed Eupator (talk · contribs) = 76.67.197.45 (talk · contribs)
 Confirmed Namsos (talk · contribs) = Hune2 (talk · contribs)
 Inconclusive 66.192.195.19 (talk · contribs)
— Rlevse • Talk • 00:19, 30 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Typo above. Its x.193, not x.19. Have you tried 66.192.195.193 (talk+ · tag · contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · proxy check · block user · block log · cross-wiki contribs · CheckUser (log))? Jehochman Talk 02:14, 30 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

information Note:Eupator provided me with a satisfactory explanation. Please don't take action on that account. I see no reason why Namsos would need a second account to edit in the same area of the encyclopedia. It might be appropriate to notify them and ask for an explanation. I don't see a need to block at this time. Jehochman Talk 03:26, 30 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

As CU results show, the IP 66.192.195.193 is Hetoum I (talk · contribs) evading the arbcom imposed parole. I think it is time to make his ban permanent, as he is unlikely to stop. See recent warnings at Hetoum's talk. Grandmaster (talk) 05:41, 30 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I see that Bursteam (talk · contribs) is likely 66.192.195.193 (talk · contribs) [11] and Bursteam (talk · contribs) = Hetoum I (talk · contribs), per tags and talk page messages. Can a CU confirm that? I agree that strong sanctions are needed here. Jehochman Talk 05:48, 30 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
 Inconclusive that Bursteam (talk · contribs) = 66.192.195.193 (talk · contribs). Same geographic region, but different ISP. Nishkid64 (Make articles, not wikidrama) 20:51, 30 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

And Hetoum is back as 128.122.253.228 (talk+ · tag · contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · proxy check · block user · block log · cross-wiki contribs · CheckUser (log)). I think it is quite obvious that all the IPs reverting the page Sisak (eponym) belong to the same person. Grandmaster (talk) 06:23, 31 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]


If you are creating a new request about this user, please add it to the top of the page, above this notice. Don't forget to add
{{Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/VartanM}}
to the checkuser page here. Previous requests (shown below), and this box, will be automatically hidden on Requests for checkuser (but will still appear here).
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.

VartanM

request links: main • edit • links • history • watch • talk
Filed: 21:56, 19 June 2007 (UTC)

Recently on 19 June 2007 there was an edit warring on Church of Kish page [12]. after all users spent their revert limits, and some even broke it, there appeared an IP and just-a-new account which continued reverting. for example, User:VartanM did four reverts [13], [14], [15], [16] and User:Hetoum I did three reverts [17][18][19], and then there appeared TheTruth4578 (talk · contribs) and IP 202.41.187.247 to do new reverts. Ateshi-Baghavan 21:56, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Lets check everybody shall we? VartanM 23:30, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
With great pleasure Vartanm, except, by including my name again don't forget this [20]. Thanks. Atabek 00:34, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I'm sure its not you Atabek, but since I'm being checked why not check everybody? hopefully after this we could have a sock free enviroment. VartanM 02:03, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
LOL Atabek, you boast so proudly that Vartan was wrong about you before. Perhaps we should remind you of a certain user called Tengri. - Fedayee 23:23, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
You have been repeating that for 6 months, and have been through one ArbCom already. That issue was settled and clarifications have been made. Assume good faith. Atabek 23:47, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

 Clerk note: commentd from the accused moved to talk page. --ST47Talk 23:21, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Red X Unrelated. Second batch not checked. Voice-of-All 20:46, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.
Subsequent requests related to this user should be made above, in a new section.


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.
Subsequent requests related to this user should be made above, in a new section.


Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_checkuser/Case/VartanM&oldid=1138659747"
Uses material from the Wikipedia article Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/VartanM, released under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license.