Wikipedia:Requests for feedback/2010 November 20

what do you guys think about this article

Charleswiren (talk) 01:24, 20 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please review this page and let me know what are the addtions and removals needed for this page. Thanks in advance guys

Arunsdharan (talk) 06:12, 20 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

There are several issues causing this article to not be ready for the main namespace:

• It needs additional references appearing in independent, reliable sources.
• It reads like a advertisement; articles must be written from a neutral point of view.
• The links in the "Offices" section should not be there. To quote the Manual of Style on linking:

I hope this helps. -- Bk314159 (Talk to me and find out what I've done) 21:14, 20 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I am trying to get some feedback so this article can be properly published. But it's impossible to tell if a request for feedback has even been sent, and it constantly returns to this page, warning me to wait!

Edward G Ellis (talk) 13:54, 20 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This page has been put up in response to a general lack of notable people (on wikipedia) who have made significant contributions to combating ageism in our country. I have checked and double-checked my sources and made sure to correctly cite all my references. However, it'd be nice to have an extra pair of eyes to check over the article...

Pchung858 (talk) 16:24, 20 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, The article written needs a view from someone with some knowlegde of the subject, but general comments maybe just as valuable. Thanks in advance.

Klu andre (talk) 19:54, 20 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please review this article http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crazy_Bad_Air_Quality it is my first article and I want to make sure I did it right.

Unclass (talk) 20:31, 20 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Cute, but nowhere near OK as an article. I've rewritten it and merged it to Pollution in China#Air pollution. Fences&Windows 03:29, 24 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

What do you think?

Feliciaamberalexis (talk) 01:05, 21 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like a pretty decent start, with a lot of good research. I would suggest adding more reliable sources toward the beginning of the article. The prose needs to be adjusted to read more like an encyclopedic article. Good start! PrincessofLlyr ^{royal court} 19:43, 24 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]