Wikipedia:WikiProject Botswana/Assessment

WikiProject BotswanaDiscussionParticipantsAssessmentTemplatesPortal

Goal: No More Than 100 Stubs

Backlog: Stub-Class Botswana articles
Goal: 999 articles
Current: 1,030 articles
Initial: 1,459 articles
(Refresh)

Recognized content

Progress rainbow

  • 5.8% List-Class
  • 55.1% Stub-Class
  • 28.4% Start-Class
  • 5.9% C-Class
  • 2.2% B-Class
  • 1.6% GA-Class
  • 0.1% A-Class
  • 0.8% FA-Class

Good articles

Former good articles

Did you know? articles

A-Class articles

In the News articles

Picture of the day pictures

Level 3 vital articles

Level 4 vital articles

Level 5 vital articles

Quality assessment

An article's quality assessment is generated from the class parameter in the {{WikiProject banner shell}}. Articles that have the {{WikiProject Botswana}} project banner on their talk page will be added to the appropriate categories by quality.

The following values may be used for the class parameter to describe the quality of the article (see Wikipedia:Content assessment for assessment criteria):

FA (for featured articles only; adds articles to Category:FA-Class Botswana articles) FA
A (adds articles to Category:A-Class Botswana articles) A
GA (for good articles only; adds articles to Category:GA-Class Botswana articles) GA
B (adds articles to Category:B-Class Botswana articles)B
C (adds articles to Category:C-Class Botswana articles)C
Start (adds articles to Category:Start-Class Botswana articles)Start
Stub (adds articles to Category:Stub-Class Botswana articles)Stub
FL (for featured lists only; adds articles to Category:FL-Class Botswana articles) FL
List (adds articles to Category:List-Class Botswana articles)List

For non-standard grades and non-mainspace content, the following values may be used for the class parameter:

Category (for categories; adds pages to Category:Category-Class Botswana pages)Category
Disambig (for disambiguation pages; adds pages to Category:Disambig-Class Botswana pages)Disambig
Draft (for drafts; adds pages to Category:Draft-Class Botswana pages)Draft
FM (for featured media only; adds pages to Category:FM-Class Botswana pages) FM
File (for files and timed text; adds pages to Category:File-Class Botswana pages)File
Portal (for portal pages; adds pages to Category:Portal-Class Botswana pages)Portal
Project (for project pages; adds pages to Category:Project-Class Botswana pages)Project
Redirect (for redirect pages; adds pages to Category:Redirect-Class Botswana pages)Redirect
Template (for templates and modules; adds pages to Category:Template-Class Botswana pages)Template
NA (for any other pages where assessment is unnecessary; adds pages to Category:NA-Class Botswana pages)NA
??? (articles for which a valid class has not yet been provided are listed in Category:Unassessed Botswana articles)???

Quality scale

Importance assessment

An article's importance assessment is generated from the importance parameter in the {{WikiProject Botswana}} project banner on its talk page:

{{WikiProject Botswana|importance=???}}

The following values may be used for the importance parameter to describe the relative importance of the article within the project (see Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Priority of topic for assessment criteria):

Top (adds articles to Category:Top-importance Botswana articles) Top 
High (adds articles to Category:High-importance Botswana articles) High 
Mid (adds articles to Category:Mid-importance Botswana articles) Mid 
Low (adds articles to Category:Low-importance Botswana articles) Low 
NA (adds articles to Category:NA-importance Botswana articles) NA 
??? (articles for which a valid importance rating has not yet been provided are listed in Category:Unknown-importance Botswana articles) ??? 

Importance scale

Importance must be regarded as a relative term. If importance values are applied within this project, these only reflect the perceived importance to this project. An article judged to be "Top-Class" in one context may be only "Mid-Class" in another. The criteria used for rating article importance are not meant to be an absolute or canonical view of how significant the topic is. Rather, they attempt to gauge the probability of the average reader of Wikipedia needing to look up the topic (and thus the immediate need to have a suitably well-written article on it).

Uses material from the Wikipedia article Wikipedia:WikiProject Botswana/Assessment, released under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license.