Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Fashion

This is a collection of discussions on the deletion of articles related to Fashion or clothing. It is one of many deletion lists coordinated by WikiProject Deletion sorting. Anyone can help maintain the list on this page.

Adding a new AfD discussion

Adding an AfD to this page does not add it to the main page at WP:AFD. Similarly, removing an AfD from this page does not remove it from the main page at WP:AFD. If you want to nominate an article for deletion, go through the process on that page before adding it to this page. To add a discussion to this page, follow these steps:

Edit this page and add {{Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PageName}} to the top of the list. Replace "PageName" with the relevant article name, i.e. the one on the existing AFD discussion. Also, indicate the title of the article in the edit summary as it is particularly helpful to add a link to the article in the edit summary. When you save the page, the discussion will automatically appear.
You should also tag the AfD by adding {{subst:delsort|Fashion|~~~~}} to it, which will inform editors that it has been listed here. You may place this tag above or below the nomination statement or at the end of the discussion thread.

There are a few scripts and tools that can make this easier.

Removing a closed AfD discussion

Closed AfD discussions are automatically removed by a bot.

Other types of discussions

You can also add and remove other discussions (prod, CfD, TfD etc.) related to Fashion or clothing. For the other XfD's, the process is the same as AfD (except {{Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/PageName}} is used for MFD and {{transclude xfd}} for the rest). For PRODs, adding a link with {{prodded}} will suffice.

Further information

For further information see Wikipedia's deletion policy and WP:AfD for general information about Articles for Deletion, including a list of article deletions sorted by day of nomination.

Archived discussions (starting from September 2007) may be found at:

WikiProject Deletion sorting/Fashion/archive

Purge page cache

watch

Fashion

Sana Khan

If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.

However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end.

Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts: {{subst:spa|username}}; suspected canvassed users: {{subst:canvassed|username}}; accounts blocked for sockpuppetry: {{subst:csm|username}} or {{subst:csp|username}}.

AfDs for this article:

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Since retiring from acting in 2020 and marrying Mufti Anas Sayed, Sana Khan has not received any independent & substantive coverage in reliable sources, with only minor attention arising from her occasional controversial statements. She does not remain notable in any way now. + Article is full of promotional gebbrish tone. Chronos.Zx (talk) 01:16, 13 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Actors and filmmakers, Artists, Businesspeople, Women, Film, Entertainment, Beauty pageants, Fashion, India, and Maharashtra. Chronos.Zx (talk) 01:16, 13 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy keep: What a joke. The article is substantially sourced. So someone's prolific career of over 10 years and media coverage is eclipsed by their retirement? Kailash29792 (talk) 02:21, 13 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
the article sources largely consist of routine or promotional coverage, failing WP:GNG requirement for significant, independent sources. The promotional tone, especially in sections on her businesses and personal life, violates WP:NPROMO. A "speedy keep" vote doesn't address these issues. Regards Chronos.Zx (talk) 04:26, 13 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy keep per Kailash. UnregisteredBiohazard (what i do • what did i do now?) 02:43, 13 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy keep: Her notability now doesn't affect her past notability. Not that I have to teach you how to count, but she had lead roles in 9 films meeting WP:NACTOR: Silambattam, Thambikku Indha Ooru, Kalyanram Kathi, Payanam, Kool...Sakkath Hot Maga, Aayiram Vilakku, Mr. Nookayya, Climax and Wajah Tum Ho. P. S., she is the first billing of Climax. DareshMohan (talk) 02:47, 13 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
WP:NACTOR requires “significant roles in multiple notable productions,” and the notability of the listed films (as you've quoted a list, Silambattam, Climax, Wajah Tum Ho) is questionable, as many are not established as notable on Enwiki (lacking their own articles or significant coverage). Climax (2013), despite her top billing, is a low-profile Malayalam film with limited independent coverage, as seen in [Ref 60, The New Indian Express, which is brief]. Roles in films like Wajah Tum Ho, a commercial failure [Ref 67, Bollywood Hungama], or Mr. Nookayya, where she played a glamorous supporting role [Ref 58, The Hindu], don’t demonstrate the sustained significance required. Chronos.Zx (talk) 04:30, 13 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
All these films meet notability as long as they have at least two reviews, per WP:NFILM. Silambattam especially. And Climax, a biopic of this late icon isn't "low profile". These articles are just not well developed but can be. Kailash29792 (talk) 04:46, 13 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy keep: Hello, Chronos.Zx. You need to gain a better understanding of AfD before nominating multiple articles for deletion. Without this, your actions may be perceived as disruptive. Your reasoning does not align with AfD policy—please refer to WP:NOTTEMPORARY, which states that notability is not temporary.–𝐎𝐰𝐚𝐢𝐬 𝐀𝐥 𝐐𝐚𝐫𝐧𝐢 ʕʘ̅͜ʘ̅ʔ 02:56, 13 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
She was not notable before 2020 also. The article has a promotional tone and appears to be the result of paid or overly glorifying edits. And if you're following me after this, then please stop. Chronos.Zx (talk) 03:56, 13 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I wasn’t aware that you had previously commented on the Bahishti Zewar debate. Sana Khan had been on my watchlist since she gained attention following her exit from Bollywood. I’m simply trying to clarify that her notability is not based on her marriage or related matters. She meets the criteria for notability under WP:ENTERTAINER.–𝐎𝐰𝐚𝐢𝐬 𝐀𝐥 𝐐𝐚𝐫𝐧𝐢 ʕʘ̅͜ʘ̅ʔ 04:41, 13 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy keep: absolutely notable subject.

Afstromen (talk) 10:34, 13 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy keep: notable subject. Niasoh ❯❯❯ Wanna chat? 11:07, 13 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy keep: It seems that the nominator is joking, the subject is Notable. Taabii (talk) 11:51, 13 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

U2 Clothing

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Defunct non notable clothing brand, lacking significant coverage in independent reliable secondary sources on the page or elsewhere. No information at WP:CORPDEPTH per the WP:NCORP guidelines. Tagged for 18 years. Sirfurboy🏄 (talk) 21:04, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies, Fashion, and Hong Kong. Sirfurboy🏄 (talk) 21:04, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Delete - Has not existed for a few years. Aka G2000 and founded by Michael Tien.— Maile (talk) 22:25, 12 May 2025 (UTC)/[reply]
Notability is WP:NOTTEMPORARY. What about a redirect to Michael Tien or G2000? DCsansei (talk) 05:38, 13 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Warren James Jewellers

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Should be deleted because it lacks independent, reliable sources to establish notability as required by Wikipedia guidelines. Xrimonciam (talk) 08:06, 30 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Xrimonciam (talk) 08:06, 30 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 09:56, 30 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Fashion and England. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 10:49, 30 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, nothing found in support of retaining this article here. Ran a WP:BEFORE but hope of finding WP:SIGCOV effectively truncated by the abysmal search result. Patre23 (talk) 13:19, 30 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

!vote From an initial review, there appears to be a lack of secondary sources. However, the company is - in my view - notable. It is described in 2006 as "the United Kingdom's largest independent jeweller" in a Nominet ruling. It is described as a national jewellery retailer in a more recent 2023 legal judgment. It's last statutory accounts show a revenue of over £100m per year. I will attempt to complete a more thorough review of secondary sources to support notability. Salicia7 (talk) 13:59, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep I added the Nominet ruling as a citation, but struggled to find further secondary sources. However, in my view there is adequate references for a stub of this lenght. Salicia7 (talk) 15:33, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, asilvering (talk) 06:35, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Brian Hansen (pornographic actor)

AfDs for this article:

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

It doesn't seem like this one meets WP:GNG. The references are not SIGCOV and most of them don't seem like reliable sources. BuySomeApples (talk) 10:25, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 11:57, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 11:57, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 11:57, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 11:58, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions.CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 12:01, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Netherlands-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 12:05, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Norway-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 12:06, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Doesn't look like the sources are significant coverage, and while I don't know if this recreated version is significantly different from the previously deleted version, it seems that the previous deletion nomination closed with the same finding and it is unlikely that much changed. silviaASH (inquire within) 12:16, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: Following sources seem to be coverage significant enough, considering he has been featured in DNA magazine and made headlines in AVN and XBIZ:

Bright, Richard (2006-08-17). "Porn Star Q&A: Brian Hansen". AVN.
"Meet Brian Hansen". Fleshbot. 2006-04-25.
"COLT Launches Buckshot Man Brian Hansen's Fan Site". XBIZ. 2007-02-06
"BRIAN HANSEN The life and times and pajamas of porn's latest superstar". DNA. No. 81. January 2006.
"Brian Hansen's Grabby Snatch". DNA Magazine #90. July 2007. p. 10. Retrieved 2025-04-20 – via Scribd.
Rice, G. Zisk (2010-01-08). "Buckshot Man Brian Hansen Returns in 'Lotus'". AVN. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Arkavirya (talk • contribs) 12:59, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A cleanup could be done of unreliable sources, instead of deleting the entire article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Arkavirya (talk • contribs) 13:08, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep The sources are too efficient (AVN) to justify keeping the article Iban14mxl (talk) 02:03, 27 April 2025 (UTC) WP:SOCKSTRIKE Warm Regards, Miminity (Talk?) (me contribs) 07:17, 29 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Can we get a source eval?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Benison (Beni · talk) 10:39, 28 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, passes SIGCOV Madeline1805 (talk) 13:00, 28 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Fails WP:NACTOR. Needs coverage in more independent sources than AVN and DNA. LibStar (talk) 13:53, 4 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Benison (Beni · talk) 06:33, 6 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Delete. The are all either not RS or not SIGCOV. Furthermore, the article is quite vague (e.g. "his parents were from two different continents") and certainly does not read as an encyclopaedic article. Overall, I'd say it could be saved if it wasn't for the questionable reliability of the sources, and the fact those are the best that seem to be available. JacobTheRox (talk) 06:52, 6 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I believe there should be some coverage outside media only focused on the adult industry. That still leaves plenty of notable porn actors. gidonb (talk) 05:02, 7 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Fashion proposed deletions (PROD)

Annu Patel (via WP:PROD on 6 November 2024)