Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Food and drink

Deletion Sorting Project
(talk) Project page Lists (by ABC) Lists (by topic) Lists (computer-readable) AfD: Today, Yesterday Delsort scripts
v t e

This is a collection of discussions on the deletion of articles related to Food and drink. It is one of many deletion lists coordinated by WikiProject Deletion sorting. Anyone can help maintain the list on this page.

Adding a new AfD discussion

Adding an AfD to this page does not add it to the main page at WP:AFD. Similarly, removing an AfD from this page does not remove it from the main page at WP:AFD. If you want to nominate an article for deletion, go through the process on that page before adding it to this page. To add a discussion to this page, follow these steps:

1. Edit this page and add {{Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PageName}} to the top of the list. Replace "PageName" with the relevant article name, i.e. the one on the existing AFD discussion. Also, indicate the title of the article in the edit summary as it is particularly helpful to add a link to the article in the edit summary. When you save the page, the discussion will automatically appear.
2. You should also tag the AfD by adding {{subst:delsort|Food and drink|~~~~}} to it, which will inform editors that it has been listed here. You may place this tag above or below the nomination statement or at the end of the discussion thread.

There are a few scripts and tools that can make this easier.

Removing a closed AfD discussion

Closed AfD discussions are automatically removed by a bot.

Other types of discussions

You can also add and remove other discussions (prod, CfD, TfD etc.) related to Food and drink. For the other XfD's, the process is the same as AfD (except {{Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/PageName}} is used for MFD and {{transclude xfd}} for the rest). For PRODs, adding a link with {{prodded}} will suffice.

Further information

For further information see Wikipedia's deletion policy and WP:AfD for general information about Articles for Deletion, including a list of article deletions sorted by day of nomination.

Archived discussions (starting from September 2007) may be found at:

• WikiProject Deletion sorting/Food and drink/archive

Points of interest related to Food and drink on Wikipedia: Category – WikiProject – Alerts – Deletions – Cleanup – Stubs – Assessment – To-do

Points of interest related to Food on Wikipedia: Portal – Category – WikiProject – Stubs – To-do

Points of interest related to Beer on Wikipedia: History – Portal – Category – WikiProject – Alerts – Cleanup – Assessment – To-do

Points of interest related to Soft drinks on Wikipedia: Category – WikiProject – Assessment – To-do

Agna Group (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't seem to meet NCORP and I couldn't find much on a WP:BEFORE, but someone more familiar with Albanian sources might have better luck. BuySomeApples (talk) 03:15, 2 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and Albania. jlwoodwa (talk) 04:57, 2 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Food and drink, Advertising, and Environment. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 05:44, 2 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Draftify: As a recent creation with no independent or reliable sources, it should not have hit mainspace in the first place. MarioGom (talk) 09:35, 2 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:21, 9 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Agree with Draftify, redirect or simply delete. The sources posted for this article are mostly primary and two sources are unreliable. I am unable to find any acceptable sources when doing a WP:BEFORE search. The company has been in existence since 1991, so there might sources available in European languages other than English. And I am not sure what the target should be for a redirect. I'm in agreement with any appropriate target. ---Steve Quinn (talk) 22:10, 9 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

St. Dalfour France (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

lacks independent, reliable sources to establish notability as required by Wikipedia guidelines.​ Xrimonciam (talk) 08:33, 30 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Xrimonciam (talk) 08:33, 30 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 09:55, 30 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 10:48, 30 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Question for @Xrimonciam: What WP:BEFORE did you conduct prior to nomination? i know you're a dog 02:30, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep - The article has enough independent, reliable sources. A quick web search shows many more. WP:N is covered. -- Itzcuauhtli11 (talk) 01:32, 7 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, asilvering (talk) 06:34, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Globalization of wine (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article mostly duplicates existing, better articles. It has featured various improvement tags dating back to 2008, and seemingly was PRODded in 2020 - which was only removed this week (I'm not sure how that happened). I think at this point it's fairly safe to say WP:TNT applies, as it's got very little reedeming it.

In addition the article seems largely to be an essay, failing WP:NOT. CoconutOctopus talk 13:01, 27 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Food and drink and Wine. CoconutOctopus talk 13:01, 27 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  • Redirect I agree this article largely seems like an (incomplete) essay based on a chapter of a single book source. I would redirect to History of wine as most of the article is about wine history.

  Anonrfjwhuikdzz (talk) 19:00, 27 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  I considered a redirect but I think that as the Globalization of Wine article managed to have a PROD on it for 5 years! it likely isn't looked at very much if at all, and I'm not sure how useful a redirect from such a term would even be. CoconutOctopus talk 19:10, 27 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Agree with nom that the link doesn't need to be maintained. There are several pages that link to this, but redirecting to the history article isn't really relevant and those would be better simply delinked. Reywas92^Talk 01:51, 28 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• How it happened: it was deleted in 2020 and undeleted this week. jlwoodwa (talk) 06:13, 28 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  That makes so much sense. I think that's even more proof we don't need this. CoconutOctopus talk 08:19, 28 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Redirect per Anonrfjwhuikdzz. Barr Theo (talk) 23:14, 29 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge to History of wine. Neither the Tabor nor the Rachman source in the Globalization article it's currently mentioned in the History article, and I can't see any reason why they wouldn't be. BD2412 T 22:21, 30 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, asilvering (talk) 02:54, 5 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Verwurelter

Purge server cache

• Koshur Anchar (via WP:PROD on 22 March 2025)