Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Poetry

This is a collection of discussions on the deletion of articles related to Poetry. It is one of many deletion lists coordinated by WikiProject Deletion sorting. Anyone can help maintain the list on this page.

Adding a new AfD discussion

Adding an AfD to this page does not add it to the main page at WP:AFD. Similarly, removing an AfD from this page does not remove it from the main page at WP:AFD. If you want to nominate an article for deletion, go through the process on that page before adding it to this page. To add a discussion to this page, follow these steps:

Edit this page and add {{Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PageName}} to the top of the list. Replace "PageName" with the relevant article name, i.e. the one on the existing AFD discussion. Also, indicate the title of the article in the edit summary as it is particularly helpful to add a link to the article in the edit summary. When you save the page, the discussion will automatically appear.
You should also tag the AfD by adding {{subst:delsort|Poetry|~~~~}} to it, which will inform editors that it has been listed here. You may place this tag above or below the nomination statement or at the end of the discussion thread.

There are a few scripts and tools that can make this easier.

Removing a closed AfD discussion

Closed AfD discussions are automatically removed by a bot.

Other types of discussions

You can also add and remove other discussions (prod, CfD, TfD etc.) related to Poetry. For the other XfD's, the process is the same as AfD (except {{Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/PageName}} is used for MFD and {{transclude xfd}} for the rest). For PRODs, adding a link with {{prodded}} will suffice.

Further information

For further information see Wikipedia's deletion policy and WP:AfD for general information about Articles for Deletion, including a list of article deletions sorted by day of nomination.

Archived discussions (starting from September 2007) may be found at:

WikiProject Deletion sorting/Poetry/archive

Purge page cache

watch

Poetry

Jorge Veytia

If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.

However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end.

Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts: {{subst:spa|username}}; suspected canvassed users: {{subst:canvassed|username}}; accounts blocked for sockpuppetry: {{subst:csm|username}} or {{subst:csp|username}}.

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The claim to notability for this actor/writer/lawyer is not exactly clear. It seems like the most coverage he has received was in regards to his epilepsy (see this interview). I'm having trouble finding much coverage at all (movie review written by the subject?), and it seems like the article itself was created way back in 2009 by a WP:SPA. JTtheOG (talk) 22:15, 5 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Poetry, Law, Egypt, and Mexico. JTtheOG (talk) 22:15, 5 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 00:53, 6 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I think the article is complete enough and completely valid. There are numerous references to the author in internet, despite the author is well-recognized as lawyer and writer. The traffic the article receives also speaks why we should keep it. 188.33.26.22 (talk) 10:53, 7 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Certainly, I must express my dissent. Additional facts have been introduced. THERE IS NO CONSENSUS REGARDING THE REMOVAL OF THIS ARTICLE. Pedroartafij (talk) 11:26, 7 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Let’s keep the article. It’s solid-backed up with good references, and the author’s been doing the multidisciplinary thing for over a decade now. Honestly, it just makes sense to leave it as is, given the way everything’s laid out. No need to mess with what works, especially when it’s already dialed in. Roadelallart789 (talk) 11:58, 7 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep the article. The dude seems like a straight-up genius, and the sources are solid and up-to-date, no matter what some "info cops" wanna say. Fcarbajal1 (talk) 13:32, 7 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please note that Roadelallart789 (talk · contribs · account creation) and Pedroartafij (talk · contribs · account creation) were both registered during this AfD and have made no prior edits to any other topics. Fcarbajal1 (talk · contribs · account creation) was registered in 2010, and their only edit was to Jorge Veytia. The account went inactive for 15 years and showed up again to !vote in this AfD. Obvious WP:VOTESTACKING attempt is obvious. Vanilla Wizard 💙 13:09, 7 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Well, sincerely I hope this article stays since I know him personally. I already notified him about the subject. Sorry for opening the Wiki account just to defend it. I vote to keep it. 🌿 Pedroartafij (talk) 14:04, 7 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I agree with the nominator, there is no indication of notability. --VViking_TalkEdits 14:09, 7 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Non-notable individual, I don't find any references. Not sure having narcolepsy is helpful either. Does not appear to have much critical notice either as a lawyer or actor. Oaktree b (talk) 14:42, 7 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as the nom mentioned, the closest thing to a claim-to-fame the subject has is media attention they received for their condition. I'm surprised the page existed in mainspace for as long as it did. If Jorge Veytia were a notable topic, there would be no need for him to register and de-mothball as many accounts as possible to try to prevent its deletion as the article's sources would speak for themselves. Vanilla Wizard 💙 14:51, 7 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]