Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Portugal
![]() | Points of interest related to Portugal on Wikipedia: Outline – History – Portal – Category – WikiProject – Alerts – Deletions – Cleanup – Stubs – Assessment |
This is a collection of discussions on the deletion of articles related to Portugal. It is one of many deletion lists coordinated by WikiProject Deletion sorting. Anyone can help maintain the list on this page.
- Adding a new AfD discussion
- Adding an AfD to this page does not add it to the main page at WP:AFD. Similarly, removing an AfD from this page does not remove it from the main page at WP:AFD. If you want to nominate an article for deletion, go through the process on that page before adding it to this page. To add a discussion to this page, follow these steps:
- Edit this page and add {{Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PageName}} to the top of the list. Replace "PageName" with the relevant article name, i.e. the one on the existing AFD discussion. Also, indicate the title of the article in the edit summary as it is particularly helpful to add a link to the article in the edit summary. When you save the page, the discussion will automatically appear.
- You should also tag the AfD by adding {{subst:delsort|Portugal|~~~~}} to it, which will inform editors that it has been listed here. You may place this tag above or below the nomination statement or at the end of the discussion thread.
- There are a few scripts and tools that can make this easier.
- Removing a closed AfD discussion
- Closed AfD discussions are automatically removed by a bot.
- Other types of discussions
- You can also add and remove other discussions (prod, CfD, TfD etc.) related to Portugal. For the other XfD's, the process is the same as AfD (except {{Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/PageName}} is used for MFD and {{transclude xfd}} for the rest). For PRODs, adding a link with {{prodded}} will suffice.
- Further information
- For further information see Wikipedia's deletion policy and WP:AfD for general information about Articles for Deletion, including a list of article deletions sorted by day of nomination.
This list is also part of the larger list of deletion debates related to Europe.

watch |
![]() | Scan for Portugal related AfDs Scan for Portugal related Prods |
Portugal
- Miguel Barbosa (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
According to the sources provided, he played briefly in the 3rd tier of Portugal and the 2nd tier of Serbia, which is far from indicative of a notable career. I have revived the Diario de Noticias source and it's only a very brief article about a hat-trick. My own searches yielded nothing better than RTP Madeira, which is also insignificant. Given the low level that he played at and my own WP:BEFORE, I can't see him passing WP:GNG or WP:SPORTBASIC. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 18:26, 13 May 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Football, and Portugal. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 18:26, 13 May 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 18:28, 13 May 2025 (UTC)
- Delete - no evidence of notability. If sources are found which show significant coverage please ping me. GiantSnowman 18:37, 13 May 2025 (UTC)
- Delete—per nom. Anwegmann (talk) 00:35, 14 May 2025 (UTC)
- João Caminata (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Stats stub with no evidence of WP:SPORTBASIC or WP:GNG. I found a loan announcement in Record and a transfer announcement in RTP Madeira but both of these are far from significant coverage. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 18:17, 13 May 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Football, and Portugal. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 18:18, 13 May 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 18:29, 13 May 2025 (UTC)
- Delete - no evidence of notability. If sources are found which show significant coverage please ping me. GiantSnowman 18:37, 13 May 2025 (UTC)
- Delete—Likewise found nothing approaching WP:SIGCOV. Anwegmann (talk) 00:36, 14 May 2025 (UTC)
- Mário Gassamá (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I believe he clearly fails WP:SPORTCRIT, having only played in the semi-amateur Macedonian league as well as scond and fourth tiers in other countries. But does he meet GNG? I believe that he does not. Ref 1 is paywalled, but I don't think it's enough anyway. Refs 2 and 3 are clearly just a few sentences, and ref 4 is a match report, i.e. not specifically about Gassamá. I also found some scant match report-type of coverage in Portuguese. Geschichte (talk) 05:49, 8 May 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Football, and Portugal. Shellwood (talk) 09:54, 8 May 2025 (UTC)
Question i have seen in other afds where people argue that playing in a top flight league in any country has the subject pass the nesccary guidelines and it says in the article that the subject played 16 games for a top flight North Macedonian team though I'm not sure if this argument is vaild so I haven't voted yet Scooby453w (talk)
- Level of play is totally irrelevant. Also please sign your posts using four tildes (~~~~). GiantSnowman 18:07, 8 May 2025 (UTC)
- "Level of play is totally irrelevant." Since when? It's not long ago when it was totally relevant.@GiantSnowmanSyvä-äksy (talk) 18:20, 8 May 2025 (UTC)
- WP:NSPORTS2022. GiantSnowman 18:23, 8 May 2025 (UTC)
- To add to this, the First League of Macedonia was not seen as "granting" notability even before 2022. @Syvä-äksy For the sake of discussion, it would be interesting if you could elaborate on ref #1, are you able to bypass the paywall? How lenghty and detailed is the article? Geschichte (talk) 08:08, 9 May 2025 (UTC)
- Unfortunately no.@GeschichteSyvä-äksy (talk) 13:54, 9 May 2025 (UTC)
- To add to this, the First League of Macedonia was not seen as "granting" notability even before 2022. @Syvä-äksy For the sake of discussion, it would be interesting if you could elaborate on ref #1, are you able to bypass the paywall? How lenghty and detailed is the article? Geschichte (talk) 08:08, 9 May 2025 (UTC)
- WP:NSPORTS2022. GiantSnowman 18:23, 8 May 2025 (UTC)
- "Level of play is totally irrelevant." Since when? It's not long ago when it was totally relevant.@GiantSnowmanSyvä-äksy (talk) 18:20, 8 May 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. GiantSnowman 18:04, 8 May 2025 (UTC)
- Delete - no evidence of notability. If sources are found which show significant coverage please ping me. GiantSnowman 18:07, 8 May 2025 (UTC)
- Delete - fails WP:GNG and SPORTCRIT based on my searches as well. From the latter, All sports biographies, must include at least one reference to a source providing significant coverage of the subject, excluding database sources. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 18:12, 13 May 2025 (UTC)
Others
Categories
Deletion reviews
Miscellaneous
Proposed deletions
Redirects
Templates
See also
- Wikipedia:WikiProject Portugal/Article alerts, a bot-maintained listing of a variety of changes affecting Portugal related pages including deletion discussions