Wikipedia:WikiProject Gender studies/Assessment

⇒ Project page
⇒ Talk page
⇒ Notice Board
⇒ Translation
⇒ Assessment
⇒ Popular pages
⇒ Templates
⇒ Collaboration
⇒ Deletion sorting
⇒ WikiProject Feminism
⇒ Portal:Feminism
Category:WikiProject Gender studies

One of the proposed tasks of Project Gender studies is to assess the quality of Wikipedia's Gender studies articles. The resulting article ratings are used within the project to help in recognising excellent contributions and identifying topics in need of further work. This plays a role in the WP:1.0 program.

The assessment is done in a distributed fashion through parameters in the {{WikiProject Gender studies}} project banner; this causes the articles to be placed in the appropriate sub-categories of Category:Gender studies articles by quality and Category:Gender studies articles by importance, which serve as the foundation for an automatically generated worklist.

How to Assess

An article's quality assessment is generated from the class parameter in the {{WikiProject banner shell}}. Articles that have the {{WikiProject Gender studies}} project banner on their talk page will be added to the appropriate categories by quality.

The following values may be used for the class parameter to describe the quality of the article (see Wikipedia:Content assessment for assessment criteria):


FA (for featured articles only; adds articles to Category:FA-Class Gender studies articles)		FA
A (adds articles to Category:A-Class Gender studies articles)		A
GA (for good articles only; adds articles to Category:GA-Class Gender studies articles)		GA
B (adds articles to Category:B-Class Gender studies articles)		B
C (adds articles to Category:C-Class Gender studies articles)		C
Start (adds articles to Category:Start-Class Gender studies articles)		Start
Stub (adds articles to Category:Stub-Class Gender studies articles)		Stub
FL (for featured lists only; adds articles to Category:FL-Class Gender studies articles)		FL
List (adds articles to Category:List-Class Gender studies articles)		List

For non-standard grades and non-mainspace content, the following values may be used for the class parameter:


NA (for any other pages where assessment is unnecessary; adds pages to Category:NA-Class Gender studies pages)		NA
??? (articles for which a valid class has not yet been provided are listed in Category:Unassessed Gender studies articles)		???

Discussing / Disputing ratings

Please use this subpage's talk page to question and/or discuss article ratings.

Quality scale

It is suggested that Project Gender studies use the same criteria for grading articles as set out by the Version 1.0 Editorial Team, as set out below.

Importance assessment

An article's importance assessment is generated from the importance parameter in the {{WikiProject Gender studies}} project banner on its talk page:

{{WikiProject Gender studies|importance=???}}

The following values may be used for the importance parameter to describe the relative importance of the article within the project (see Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Priority of topic for assessment criteria):


Top (adds articles to Category:Top-importance Gender studies articles)		Top
High (adds articles to Category:High-importance Gender studies articles)		High
Mid (adds articles to Category:Mid-importance Gender studies articles)		Mid
Low (adds articles to Category:Low-importance Gender studies articles)		Low
NA (adds articles to Category:NA-importance Gender studies articles)		NA
??? (articles for which a valid importance rating has not yet been provided are listed in Category:Unknown-importance Gender studies articles)		???

Importance scale

Popular pages

The results of the assessment combined with information on traffic statistics for pages produces this list.

Assessment log

May 11, 2025

Reassessed

Bella Ramsey (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from C-Class to B-Class. (rev · t) Importance rating changed from Unknown-Class to Low-Class. (rev · t)
Güevedoce (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Start-Class to NA-Class. (rev · t) Importance rating changed from Unknown-Class to NA-Class. (rev · t)

May 10, 2025

Reassessed

Agents of Ishq (talk) reassessed. Importance rating changed from Unknown-Class to Low-Class. (rev · t)
LGBTQ people (talk) reassessed. Importance rating changed from Low-Class to Top-Class. (rev · t)

May 9, 2025

Assessed

Karina Batthyány (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Unknown-Class. (rev · t)

May 7, 2025

Reassessed

Feminism (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from GA-Class to C-Class. (rev · t)
Women in combat (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Start-Class to C-Class. (rev · t)

Assessed

Draft:Recurring Transgender (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)

May 6, 2025

Assessed

Gender of the Holy Spirit (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as C-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Unknown-Class. (rev · t)
Draft:Petra Christova (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
Sexology (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as C-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Unknown-Class. (rev · t)
This Book Is Gay (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as C-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Unknown-Class. (rev · t)

May 5, 2025

Renamed

Gender in youth sports renamed to Youth sports.

Assessed

Coital imperative (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as C-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)
Gender in youth sports in the United States (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as C-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Mid-Class. (rev · t)
Category:Gender systems (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
Draft:Karolina Krasuska (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
Orgasm imperative (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as C-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)