Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/2013-08-07/Traffic report

Greetings from the graveyard

Summary: It's crickets and tumbleweeds this week, as the top 10 sees its lowest view-count since the tracking project began. If Wikipedia were selling anything, we'd be having a fire sale by now.

For the complete top 25, plus analysis, see: WP:TOP25

For the week of July 28 to August 3, the 10 most popular articles on Wikipedia, as determined from the report of the 5,000 most trafficked pages* were:

← Previous "Traffic report"

In this issue

7 August 2013 (all comments)

Arbitration report

Traffic report

News and notes

WikiProject report

Featured content

Discussion report

+ Add a comment

Discuss this story

These comments are automatically transcluded from this article's talk page. To follow comments, add the page to your watchlist. If your comment has not appeared here, you can try purging the cache.

• Sorry. I'm not a regular reader of the Signpost so perhaps I'm missing context, but what are you saying? Are you saying fewer people are visiting en.Wikipedia? --Anthonyhcole (talk · contribs · email) 11:31, 10 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

  Yes. At least for the week being tracked. Serendi^podous 11:44, 10 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

  Thanks! Is there a graph somewhere?

  Couldn't it be the case where Google directs users to https pages in which visits don't count? I've read about this issue before, but I can't remember the details. Mohamed CJ (talk) 18:21, 10 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

  That was a problem for a few months, but it's now been fixed. --Anthonyhcole (talk · contribs · email) 02:42, 11 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

  I see. Then does anyone know why is this happening? Mohamed CJ (talk) 02:48, 11 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

  It's probably because it's summer and people have better things to do than surf the web. Serendi^podous 02:55, 11 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

  Is there a graph somewhere? Meta? --Anthonyhcole (talk · contribs · email) 05:23, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

  I don't know. Wikipedia's rule is not to care how many people are reading the information, only to ensure that the information is there to be read. Serendi^podous 06:59, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

http://stats.wikimedia.org/EN/SummaryEN.htm has als always wealths of stats too. Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 23:18, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• you have all misunderstood the stats. We probably, based on fairly average page views of the perennial top 10 article Facebook (most weeks between 500 & 700k views), have had very average total page views across the board. But we haven't all looked at the same page as much as other weeks. We do have the choice of 4 million to view, after all. The-Pope (talk) 00:32, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]