Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard

This is a message board for talking about tasks on Wikipedia that only administrators can do. Please put new messages at the bottom of the talk page or click here to start a new discussion.

Please note that the messages on this page are archived periodically. A message may therefore have been archived. Note however, that the archives must not be modified, so if something needs discussing, please start a new discussion on this page.

Are you in the right place?

• This is the Simple English Wikipedia. Click here for the Administrators' Noticeboard on the regular English Wikipedia.
• Use Vandalism in progress to report serious and urgent vandalism from other users to administrators.
• Use Requests for permissions to request administrators to give you tools that can help you do things faster on Wikipedia, such as rollback.
• Use Simple talk to ask general questions about Wikipedia and how to use it.
• See meta:Steward requests/Username changes to change your user name or take another user name.
• See WP:RFCU for CheckUser requests.
• See WP:OS for oversight.

Repeatedly re-created spam (?).--If y'all wonder, no mention at En-wiki, and not even previous linked discussions there. 2001:2020:C335:8778:39F6:C945:EC3A:939D (talk) 08:30, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Yup, it's pure low-quality meme junk. This version tagged for quick deletion already by Codename Noreste. Ravensfire (talk) 13:14, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I've WP:SALTed it. Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 15:26, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank ya kindly! Ravensfire (talk) 15:39, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite full feels a bit harsh.- FusionSub (Talk page) (Contributions) 09:26, 16 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think it's a really large burden to do if we have to lift protection someday. Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 14:50, 16 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Article-title (with minor change of title).--Should probably be deleted and salted.--From a 'promotional angle', it is valuable to keep the title, (even as a redirect), because of 'hits on Google'. 2001:2020:8355:B9EA:55A0:950D:92EA:8F74 (talk) 09:39, 19 April 2025 (UTC)/ original poster[reply]

"Sibling spam"? If interesting for admins, then fine. 2001:2020:8341:83A0:64C7:11D7:E12D:5F1D (talk) 20:41, 16 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I've tagged it for deletion. Ternera (talk) 20:46, 16 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

It was Deleted; However, re-created at "18:08, 17 April 2025".--How about adding some salt if-and-when Delete, the second time. (Salt for six months or indefinitely.) 2001:2020:8341:83A0:1D98:EF94:E0DB:7457 (talk) 18:12, 17 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

AI Brainrot animals - needs salt (if the "reincarnation" also gets deleted)? 2001:2020:8355:B9EA:104A:2ACC:2531:73CB (talk) 17:42, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Needs Salt, six months: "11:57, 30 April 2025 ... deleted page
[ ... blah-blah ('re-reincarnation) ] (QD A4:". 2001:2020:331:FBBD:A8DD:89C4:4A4B:E0A0 (talk) 15:12, 30 April 2025 (UTC) /original poster[reply]

Can any admin create shortcuts for Wikipedia:Change filter/Mistakes as WP:CM,WP:CFM or WP:C/FM ? because we also have some shortcuts for Wikipedia:Vandalism in progress, Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser, and [Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard]. Bensebgli ^(Talk) 15:29, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This isn't a task you would need an admin for. You should probably get a consensus that they are beneficial though. Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 19:43, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Agree we need consensus if we need shortcuts for Wikipedia:Change filter/Mistakes. Bensebgli ^(Talk) 06:51, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I would be interested in having a quick shortcut for that. Ternera (talk) 20:28, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Ternera You are agree for all WP:CM,WP:CFM or WP:C/FM? Or any particular one. Bensebgli ^(Talk) 06:52, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think there is a particular one I prefer more than the others, but a having a quicker way to access that page would be helpful. Ternera (talk) 13:03, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Alright. Bensebgli ^(Talk) 02:32, 30 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I think WP:CFM would make sense and be at least somewhat helpful. Ravensfire (talk) 20:32, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Ravensfire I'm okay with all, but WP:CM or WP:CFM seems more specific. Bensebgli ^(Talk) 06:56, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

WP:CFM and WP:CF/M make the most sense to me and I can see these 2 being used the most, I've created WP:CF so that CF/M would make better sense too. Just to note I don't support the proposed "WP:C/FM" as that to me says "Change/Filter Mistakes" which doesn't make any sense whereas my proposal matches the title of the page, Thanks, –Davey2010^Talk 20:51, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Repeated vandalism on these pages by LTA from glkwiki: Gilan province, Rasht, Gilaki language, Baloch people, Iran, Balochistan (region), Mazandarani language, Persian people, Gulf of Oman, Caspian Sea, Iranic peoples, Luri language, Lurs. Please consider semi-protect all of them for at least 1 month. Aqurs1 (talk) 04:52, 24 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Aqurs1: All but the last 3 have been semi-protected for a month. The last three haven't had that much activity, but feel free to ask again if there is more. -- Auntof6 (talk) 04:38, 29 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Dr.Kamaljit Das seems to be a hoax. Because the 16th president of India was not named Kamaljit Das. Also the user there has repeatedly recreated it. Should something be done about this? TagUser (talk) 18:41, 25 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@TagUser: Article was delete by Fr33kman. -- Auntof6 (talk) 04:30, 29 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The IP Special:Contribs/2603:9000:E8F0:BB00:52B:839F:1AF8:F314 keeps copying articles from English Wikipedia with a few changes. I don't know whether it would be useful to warn them for "creating inappropriate articles", so I'm referring the issue here. TagUser (talk) 20:48, 25 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The articles can probably be tagged for quick deletion under A3, which is for articles that have been "copied and pasted from another Wikipedia without simplifying". Ternera (talk) 20:57, 25 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. But the person also needs to know that if they keep doing this, they will be blocked. TagUser (talk) 20:59, 25 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You can send them warnings for the articles, and if they continue it, you can report them at WP:VIP so they admins can block them. Ternera (talk) 21:01, 25 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Like I said, I don't know whether it would be useful to warn them for "creating inappropriate articles" so someone else could figure out how to warn them TagUser (talk) 21:02, 25 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The IP is the "dinosaur troll", they spam various articles stating "x celeb voiced x dinosaur", I've given them a final warning and if they continue just report to VIP, Thanks, –Davey2010^Talk 21:03, 25 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Could someone delete:

• Green neon tetra
• Variable platyfish
• Black neon tetra

All created by LTA @Tito at shopping:, Thanks, –Davey2010^Talk 17:37, 28 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Done by Fr33kman. -- Auntof6 (talk) 04:29, 29 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

at least one of his/her articles are nonsense, Science school.--Please QD the other articles, one by one, if those too, are non-sense (as it seemed, during a half-second glance).--Indef, might be something to consider.--If this was helpful, then fine. 2001:2020:C305:834B:9DCC:B381:D69B:36B1 (talk) 18:56, 30 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I've tagged the articles for quick deletion and warned the IP. Ternera (talk) 19:43, 30 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Done. Thanks. 2001:2020:C305:834B:15C3:C09:9BB4:4A9A (talk) 02:36, 1 May 2025 (UTC) /original poster[reply]

Not okay feeling: Talk:Togetic.--Indeff, if the other articles have major concerns?--Togetic was deleted recently. 2001:2020:331:FBBD:8505:E99A:535B:5807 (talk) 07:43, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

G4'd them.- FusionSub (Talk page) (Contributions) 11:45, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Done. Thanks. 2001:2020:C305:834B:381A:B204:F2B:BBC5 (talk) 17:02, 1 May 2025 (UTC) /original poster[reply]

Can somebody ranging block IP and other IP? I think it's was same person to evading their block. — Raayaan9911 12:29, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

New IP was there. Can somebody ranging block here Raayaan9911 13:08, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Done MathXplore (talk) 13:13, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! Raayaan9911 13:17, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Benjamin Reyes (Student), is a nonsense article.

simple.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/2600:1010:B177:C19B:B482:F5AA:A57C:A041
Nuke all articles? Yes, IMO. 2001:2020:C305:834B:381A:B204:F2B:BBC5 (talk) 17:01, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Brain Technologies is linked from English-wiki!

Linked from the (en-wiki) article, about the company's founder,
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jerry_Yue
. Note: "TheBrain Technologies", has an article at En-wiki.--If this thread is helpful, then fine. 2001:2020:C305:834B:381A:B204:F2B:BBC5 (talk) 17:21, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Done. Thanks. 2001:2020:C305:834B:5C84:C4C2:F47:B770 (talk) 04:21, 2 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: En-wiki does not have Brain Technologies. However, it has an article about a (totally) different company, "TheBrain Technologies".--Sorry for not having made that crystal-clear.--The outcome, seems excellent. 2001:2020:C305:834B:280D:55CF:F01C:1590 (talk) 19:58, 2 May 2025 (UTC) /original poster /2001:2020:C305:834B:280D:55CF:F01C:1590 (talk) 20:00, 2 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Can an admin please change MediaWiki:Pagetitle-view-mainpage to either "Simple English Wikipedia" or "Simple English Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia"? This is what appears as the title of the Main Page in a browser. It would be good if it were distinguished from the English Wikipedia. TagUser (talk) 17:47, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done I'm not sure why we should break the precedent set by other Wikipedias of just having "Wikipedia" as the title. Wikipedia is our project name, and Simple English just happens to be our language. A lot of things we have often are very similar to English Wikipedia and this isn't really anything that should be distinguished without good reason. The title is already technically different - in my browser I am seeing "Wikipedia" for simplewiki, and "Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia" for enwiki. --Ferien (talk | join TBA!) 20:45, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The first diff, can seem to be only a small mistake. diff . (If no admin sees anything wrong with the edit, then i guess admins have 'done enough about that'.--However, i have not yet chosen which other diffs, indicate a bigger problem, with two users. That should be rectified, in hours.) 2001:2020:C305:834B:5C84:C4C2:F47:B770 (talk) 04:20, 2 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I dont understand what is wrong with that diff Cactus🌵 ^{spiky ツ} 10:45, 2 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

As far as I can tell, that diff just adds a comment pointing out that the section has a lot of red links, and a plea for the redlinked items to be created. It's not very helpful, because few people would see it, but I don't see that it's a problem. Am I missing something?

By the way, when you give a link you'd like someone to look at, please give it in a form that can be clicked on. When you're asking someone for help, it's best to make it as easy as possible for them to help you. Thanks. -- Auntof6 (talk) 11:29, 2 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Russian invasion of Ukraine needs some form of edit protection. It has became an edit war between an ip user who insists that The president of the United States hating ukraine dosn't contribute to the war. I have been trying to explain to them that the US has been a big source of funding and weapons. The ip-user started a disscusion on WP:ST and the consensus so far is that It should be in the article but the ip-user is still removing it. (Sorry if this isn't the right place for this.) Ieditrandomarticles (talk | contribs) 15:57, 2 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Telling me to not edit, that relevant section/sub-section (for a prescribed time), should maybe be the very last thing to consider.
Restricting (general) access to the article (to large groups), should maybe be the second-to-last possible move (about this case), for administrators.
The third-to-last move (to consider), i think, should be that wikipedia should request for a check, to see if there was an email , from user:Ieditrandomarticles, or from user:BigCrow. (The concern would be, sending of email between those two users, in the indicated timeframe.)--The sending of email, if caught by "our" checks, would then be in the timeframe (1 May and 18:10, 1 May 2025 and in the 24 hours before that (or in the 48 hours before that). (Quite possibly some time before 03:25.)
The fourth-to-last move i think, should be that user:Ieditrandomarticles gets some kind of topic ban, for adding, <!-.-Please do not remove this section. It is important to ukraine and can greatly effect the outcome of the war. --> In essence, his/her text is saying, imperatively, allow the POV-pushing (by him/her) to stay in the article!--User:Ieditrandomarticles seems to be the one, that has added that comment into the article - and she/he has now been 'caught red-handed'. Regards! 2001:2020:C305:834B:280D:55CF:F01C:1590 (talk) 18:52, 2 May 2025 (UTC) /2001:2020:C305:834B:280D:55CF:F01C:1590 (talk) 19:52, 2 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I have not emailed nor received an email from BigCrow. The "POV pushing" is stating a properly cited fact that the United States officials are cutting support for Ukraine. I added the comment because you have removed this enough times to constitute a Edit War. Consensus in the Simple Talk has been to keep it in the article. After this consensus was made, you proceeded to post about it on the English Wikipedia (Which isn't part of this project so therefor doesn't count as consensus). Ieditrandomarticles (talk | contribs) 19:16, 2 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Furthermore, it might be fair to say that user:Ieditrandomarticles, is misrepresenting things: "... the consensus so far is that It should be in the article but ...".--Blatant misrepresentation, might also be fair to say.--Furthermore, for now, En-wiki does not want the text in their article; Justification: "Probably too vague to be useful in an encyclopedia article. Also, Trump is far from the focus of [this title or "Russian_invasion_of_Ukraine" at en-wiki] ... 03:16, 2 May". 2001:2020:C305:834B:280D:55CF:F01C:1590 (talk) 19:21, 2 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

As I said, this is not EnWiki. This can be a better fit into this article than the en wiki article which would make it unjudgeable. I've made it less vauge and you only copied a portion of the article into the enwiki talk page. Ieditrandomarticles (talk | contribs) 19:56, 2 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If a text is not encyclopedic at En-wiki, then there are very few cases (if any), where such text is encyclopedic at Simple-wiki.--I recommend that you stop (in this thread), right now.--Unless, admins have further questions for you; You aren't doing yourselves any favors, if you drone on, unprompted. (I.e. , unprompted by admins). 2001:2020:C305:834B:280D:55CF:F01C:1590 (talk) 20:12, 2 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I have a full right to plead my case, just as you are doing right now. you have replied to my comment 3 times, ive made rebuttles to your claims. I suggest that we both wait for an admin or else this is going to continue in a loop just like our reverts. Thank you. Ieditrandomarticles (talk | contribs) 20:17, 2 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You have replied to my comments again and again, i've refuted your claims, en masse. I suggest that we both wait for an admin. Thank you. 2001:2020:C305:834B:280D:55CF:F01C:1590 (talk) 20:58, 2 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Could someone revdel this please as it was taken from here, Thanks, –Davey2010^Talk 21:56, 2 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Done.- FusionSub (Talk page) (Contributions) 12:35, 3 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Fusion, much appreciated –Davey2010^Talk 12:47, 3 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please move Category:Governors-General of India to Category:Governors-general of India per move to governor-general (common noun). Cactus🌵 ^{spiky ツ} 04:57, 3 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Done fr33kman 12:43, 3 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Cactusisme: Just out of curiosity, is there a particular reason you didn't want to move that yourself?

Also, I just noticed that it's empty. If it's not going to be populated, let's delete it for the time being. -- Auntof6 (talk) 13:56, 3 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

It's not empty. Merely, the pages haven't been moved from the old category title to the new category yet. 76.126.231.56 (talk) 15:36, 3 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hmmm... when I looked, it looked like both were empty. In any case, the pages hadn't moved in part because the old category had a regular redirect instead of a category redirect. I just fixed that and moved the entries, so everything looks good now. --Auntof6 (talk) 02:29, 4 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Alright thanks. Cactus🌵 ^{spiky ツ} 04:24, 4 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Auntof6: "Both the categories were populated alr. I can't move to an existent page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cactusisme (talk • contribs) 00:42, 4 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Simple_talk#Hi!, edit from today, at 16.14.

Please consider, to Delete or hide the thread.

(The thread, from May 3, starts with, "Is this Encyclopedia Britannica? Do I have to be smart to be an editor? Where do I get a neutral point of view? Are you the Department of Education? ...") . 2001:2020:C305:834B:A4E3:EAED:D1EB:1520 (talk) 17:38, 3 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Done, it seems. 2001:2020:C305:834B:1804:FAEA:FEA3:2E33 (talk) 04:57, 4 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Zoviz was Deleted, this year. Promotional.

Żoviz (AI Model), is now here.--This one is promotional.--I will QD, now. 2001:2020:C305:834B:A4E3:EAED:D1EB:1520 (talk) 17:54, 3 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ukraine-Nazi Germany Relations. En-wiki does not have the title.--Do i think that the title, is non-goodFaith?--Well, i think it should be Deleted, because the title is not a known subject (and also, Nazi-Germany invaded Ukraine, so the "-Relations" part, is meaningless, one might say).--QD? Although i am not sure what the formal justification, should be.--Disturbance of wikipedia? 2001:2020:C305:834B:A4E3:EAED:D1EB:1520 (talk) 21:10, 3 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

(Making this comment here as this person's on a new IP what seems like every minute so seems pointless heading to their talkpage, Anyway my apolgies @2001:2020:C305:834B:A4E3:EAED:D1EB:1520 for reverting you here, I did revert you based on the infoboxes and only just saw you had also added leads too, I've now rewritten the leads[1],

Just an FYI we don't have individual infoboxes - We just have one main one which at Enwiki (and probably elsewhere) is the very top infobox, Thanks, ) –Davey2010^Talk 22:44, 3 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The title looks like something that is (made-up or) construed, as part of a Victory Day celebration, in a neighboring dictatorship.--Opening up a bag of popcorn, and 'quietly' observing, as propaganda titles, come 'to town' , or to Simple-wiki. 2001:2020:C305:834B:1804:FAEA:FEA3:2E33 (talk) 04:55, 4 May 2025 (UTC) /original poster[reply]

En-wiki now has article with Italian_brainrot. That article, got a Speedy Keep, c. 29 April.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Italian_brainrot

Now, i will start, 'that' article, Italian brainrot (meme)).

Feel free to not make language-link (interwiki), to En-wiki, for the longest time.

I am fine with the article, quickly becoming 'locked for IP-users'; On the other hand, one can use the article as a recruiting tool, and revert all non-good edits, and say "Take your idea to Talk-page, first".

A big thank you to all admins (and others), who kept the stuff off wikipedia, while it still was non-notable.--We did things the right way, in my opinion. 2001:2020:C305:834B:1804:FAEA:FEA3:2E33 (talk) 05:36, 4 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The stuff that was salted for six months: I am now thinking that, just 'let that salt remain (for those titles), and in six months or whatever, things will fall in place, automatically.--It is not a big deal, 'more or less'. 2001:2020:C305:834B:1804:FAEA:FEA3:2E33 (talk) 05:53, 4 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

just because something is on enwiki, doesn't mean that we HAVE to create an article. We are a separate project. Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 08:09, 4 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Could someone delete Talk:AI Brainrot animals and protect it until 23 October 2025 to match the article protection please?, I know this may be fruitless but it's worth a shot, Thanks, –Davey2010^Talk 17:40, 4 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I am thinking it is better to leave it alone.--Now, someone has 'made their case', about 'keeping' an 'odd title'; Now, that person has six months to wait for that title being 'opened', for possible re-creation.--I am fine with all of that. 2001:2020:C305:834B:AD2A:106A:4BE3:B12 (talk) 18:30, 4 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I was talking about the article copypaste above it.... which is abuse of the talkpage, No point removing it because these people will just reinstate it or repaste the same crap again, Look at the amount of times the article has alresdy been created and tell me my theory is wrong. Should be deleted. Thanks, –Davey2010^Talk 18:41, 4 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I am thinking it is better to leave that talk-page, alone.--One day, 'the Tik-Tok crowd' will have moved on to bigger and better things.--Half a year from now, will be a fine time to 'revisit' a Delete of the talk-page. 2001:2020:C305:834B:AD2A:106A:4BE3:B12 (talk) 19:22, 4 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Not sure if you're aware but the page has to be deleted per WP:G8 anyway as there's no accompanying article with it, The RFD !vote there is meaningless as the RFD has long been closed,

I'm not sure if you're objecting to the deleting or protecting but if it's the latter then sure I'm not fussed either as looking at the logs it was only repeatedly created from 21-23 April so protection may not be needed after all, Still I'll leave this as is and a passing admin can decide, Thanks, –Davey2010^Talk 19:30, 4 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Done. We don't retain talk pages of articles that don't exist. Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 21:03, 4 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Lee, very much appreciated, Have a great day, Thanks, Warm Regards, –Davey2010^Talk 21:14, 4 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I request a move from San Diego, California to San Diego, because this city is the primary topic for the name. It will also match the title on English Wikipedia. 11USA11 (talk) 23:33, 4 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@11USA11: We could do that, but is there a reason you don't want to do it yourself? -- Auntof6 (talk) 01:54, 5 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Auntof6 I can't. The page currently at San Diego has more than one revision, so I can't move a page over that title. 11USA11 (talk) 02:15, 5 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@11USA11: Ah! Ok, the move is done. I left a redirect behind, which you are welcome to turn into a disambiguation page if you want. -- Auntof6 (talk) 02:36, 5 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your help. 11USA11 (talk) 02:43, 5 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Might wanna keep an eye on Mahdi Alzaeri. Many users are removing QD tags. Cactus🌵 ^{spiky ツ} 10:50, 5 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Wich QD tag was removed? Isn't page recently re-created? Bensebgli ^(Talk) 23:00, 5 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

See history--Cactus🌵 ^{spiky ツ} 01:51, 6 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Needs salt? Re-created (?) today, Mahdi Alzayeri. 2001:2020:C305:834B:C11B:C07F:8012:9384 (talk) 06:27, 6 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Mahdi Alzayeri, re-created (because not salted). 2001:2020:C305:834B:79A8:AB33:DB19:CA0A (talk) 20:44, 6 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

simple.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/106.215.151.157

3 out of 3 new articles, seem non-notable.--Thoughts about nuking et cetera? 2001:2020:C305:834B:B98D:F396:2A73:9CC6 (talk) 18:19, 5 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Il Fungo (Grigne).--Re-created (?), today.--No sources.--Maybe nothing here for admins to do, yet. (Non-notability, on the other hand is a general issue). 2001:2020:C305:834B:9448:9CCE:F36D:79D2 (talk) 20:23, 5 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• "George Clooney (b. 1961), American actor and film director; reportedly showed interest in purchasing Villa Aurelia in Lierna"; That is from near-the-end of diff,
  
  simple.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Lierna&curid=602589&diff=10238324&oldid=10116761
  .--If interesting for admins, then fine. 2001:2020:C305:834B:9448:9CCE:F36D:79D2 (talk) 22:08, 5 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Miss La Union 2024 should probably be merged into (or moved) to Miss La Union (which is a title at English-wiki) QD.--I have already added languagle link (or interwiki), in regard to the 'overall contest'.

Then, QD of this article, re-created under different versions of the name,. Re-creations during the last 12 months.--(Furthermore, i seem to remember that the person has never won that contest.) 2001:2020:C305:834B:C11B:C07F:8012:9384 (talk) 05:53, 6 May 2025 (UTC) /2001:2020:C305:834B:C11B:C07F:8012:9384 (talk) 05:55, 6 May 2025 (UTC) /2001:2020:C305:834B:C11B:C07F:8012:9384 (talk) 06:12, 6 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Removed QD tag,
simple.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Bilagan_Road_of_Santol%2C_La_Union&diff=10239106&oldid=10239045

(There have been some other shenanigans.) 2001:2020:C305:834B:C11B:C07F:8012:9384 (talk) 07:34, 6 May 2025 (UTC) / 2001:2020:C305:834B:C11B:C07F:8012:9384 (talk) 07:35, 6 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Zoomex (company).
"22:20, 19 April 2025 ... deleted page Zoomex (QD G11: Advertising)".--QD tag being removed. 2001:2020:C305:834B:C11B:C07F:8012:9384 (talk) 12:09, 6 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Could someone move Wikipedia:Happy Tree Friends (TV series) back to Happy Tree Friends (TV series) please as a newbie moved it to Wikipedia space and then I unknowingly moved it to a Wiki space too, Thanks –Davey2010^Talk 19:44, 6 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Once moved could Wikipedia:Happy Tree Friends (Cancelled TV series) and Wikipedia:Happy Tree Friends (TV series) be deleted please, Thanks –Davey2010^Talk 19:46, 6 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Completed. Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 07:02, 7 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Brilliant thanks Lee much appreciated, Thanks, –Davey2010^Talk 07:54, 7 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Constantly adding complex information to articles, and reverting the users edits which revert their edits. Cactus🌵 ^{spiky ツ} 11:03, 7 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Dude, I didn't think they were that complex. If the consensus is against me, my bad. Jag1762010 (talk) 12:29, 7 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You literally said it was complex, when reverting another user's edit which was reverting you. Cactus🌵 ^{spiky ツ} 12:35, 7 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I forgot to type "not", my bad Jag1762010 (talk) 12:37, 7 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Also, you just reverted an admin's edit, which was meant to revert your edit. Cactus🌵 ^{spiky ツ} 12:39, 7 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

ok? Is there some rule about not being able to revert an admin's edit? If there is, then people just shouldn't have the option of doing so. Jag1762010 (talk) 12:41, 7 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The point is that multiple people agree that your edit is bad and that you should revert it. Cactus🌵 ^{spiky ツ} 12:44, 7 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Aside from not feeling the language was too complex, I don't see the issue if the added sections were after the original paragraphs. If anyone had a problem with the added sections, they could have just skipped them, or simplified them further. There was important info there that I feel should be kept in. Jag1762010 (talk) 12:39, 7 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I've reverted the content as agree it is complex, Jag please read WP:About and BE850 to better understand the project and the words we use, Thanks, –Davey2010^Talk 12:49, 7 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Could someone protect the following articles please as IPs are randomly blanking the page

• List of programs broadcast by PBS Kids
• List of programs broadcast by Qubo

Thanks, –Davey2010^Talk 20:10, 7 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Done for the first one. The second one hasn't had much activity -- 2 edits today, 2 yesterday, then none before that since April 10. -- Auntof6 (talk) 23:34, 7 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Many thanks, for the second one I was expecting a lot more activity so pre-emptively asked for protection but I agree with your comments - only makes sense for the most edited one for now, Thanks again, –Davey2010^Talk 23:50, 7 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

En-wiki says {{Undisclosed paid |date=February 2025}.}--Our article.--Any 'admin concerns'? 2001:2020:303:BB75:145C:3C75:3834:1BDC (talk) 03:29, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

For Dog. Persistant vandalism Cactus🌵 ^{spiky ツ} 07:51, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done 2 cases of vandalism this month is not persistent vandalism.- FusionSub (Talk page) (Contributions) 10:53, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Could Wikipedia:Why is Happy Tree Friends not on Wikipedia? be deleted please as some troll has again moved the article there (I've moved it back),

I've given the user a final warning but their edits thus far don't fill me with any confidence so I wouldn't lose any sleep if they're indeffed, Thanks, –Davey2010^Talk 09:23, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Done, deleted the page.- FusionSub (Talk page) (Contributions) 10:50, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Brilliant many thanks Fusion much appreciated, Davey2010 (Mobile) –Davey2010^Talk 13:04, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

GROKR Exchangé, promotional?--In regard to hoaxy or weak sources for 'bold claim', someone else can suggest that.
Note: "22:37, 24 March 2025 ... deleted page GROKR (QD G5: Created by a blocked or banned user: Mass deletion of pages added by 39.37.58.23)". 2001:2020:303:BB75:792A:9EC4:8E73:A5D2 (talk) 12:35, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

'Other spelling'. 2001:2020:303:BB75:792A:9EC4:8E73:A5D2 (talk) 12:37, 8 May 2025 (UTC) /original poster[reply]

Note: "12:23, 10 March 2025 ... talk changes deleted page GROKR Exchange (QD G5: Created by a blocked or banned user: Special:Contributions/Alexwrightman12344, Special:Contributions/Scrap_Bunch, Special:Contributions/Jack_DeAngelis)". 2001:2020:303:BB75:792A:9EC4:8E73:A5D2 (talk) 12:38, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like it has been deleted by MathXplore. Ternera (talk) 13:12, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Done, (half-hour after the first post). Thanks. 2001:2020:303:BB75:792A:9EC4:8E73:A5D2 (talk) 14:04, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

simple.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/70.90.169.230

. 2001:2020:303:BB75:792A:9EC4:8E73:A5D2 (talk) 17:55, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

simple.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=42_(answer)&diff=prev&oldid=10048182

. 2001:2020:303:BB75:18B7:C732:D8:CF10 (talk) 21:18, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Old diff! However, the two new articles from today, have no source.--Not notable.
simple.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/152.22.65.27
. 2001:2020:303:BB75:18B7:C732:D8:CF10 (talk) 21:26, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Can an administrator import a revision from Module:Country alias? It is causing issues on United States at the 2024 Summer Olympics. Thanks. MrMeAndMrMe_Talk 00:50, 9 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I imported a fresher revision for update, let me know if the issues still exist and I will look further into it.-- BRP ^ever 04:03, 9 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This one.--QD tags were removed during previous incarnation.--Not notable. 2001:2020:303:BB75:E527:DA0A:6051:8284 (talk) 07:31, 9 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

not an admin -  Done - tagged as A4 –Davey2010^Talk 18:52, 9 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A real person.--Nonsense about that person, a relative of a dictator. 2001:2020:303:BB75:48D2:1148:2BCF:E3B (talk) 12:53, 9 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Done.- FusionSub (Talk page) (Contributions) 13:01, 9 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I want to add the new content and create an article but i am unable to create the same. please grant me the permission to do so as it is required for professional work. AkshathaPandavapura (talk) 14:34, 9 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

(non-administrator comment) Try the Article wizard. Justjourney (talk) 22:30, 9 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I have a concern about Stopstealingtheusername (talk · contribs · logs). They seem to keep creating articles which have no notability, and in fact may be hoaxes, because there are no Google search results for them. These are mainly about 'The SuperSword Warriors' which may not exist. I note that they all already blocked on English Wikipedia for not being here to build an encyclopedia. TagUser (talk) 20:57, 9 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Drake (musician) (change · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete)

Tons of vandalism happenly recently; recent temporary protection by User:MathXplore didn't work out. This page should be protected for longer. Justjourney (talk) 22:28, 9 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Done MathXplore (talk) 23:31, 9 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]