Wikipedia:Requests for deletion

If you think a page should be deleted, read the deletion policy to make sure.
Then follow these instructions on how to request a page for deletion. To find more information on what discussed deletions and quick deletions are:
PLEASE READ THIS

Before nominating: checks and alternatives

Prior to nominating article(s) for deletion, please be sure to:

A. Read and understand these policies and guidelines
  1. The Wikipedia deletion policy, which explains valid grounds for deletion.
  2. The main four guidelines and policies that inform deletion discussions: notability (WP:N), verifiability (WP:V), reliable sources (WP:RS), and what Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)
  3. Subject-specific notability guidelines, which can be found at Category:Wikipedia notability guidelines
B. Carry out these checks
  1. Confirm that the article does not meet the criteria for quick deletion.
  2. If there are verifiability, notability or other sourcing concerns, take reasonable steps to search for reliable sources. (See step D.)
  3. Review the article's history to check for potential vandalism or poor editing.
  4. Read the article's talk page for previous nominations and/or that your objections haven't already been dealt with.
  5. Check "What links here" in the article's sidebar, to see how the page is used and referenced within Wikipedia.
  6. Check if there are interlanguage links, also in the sidebar, which may lead to more developed and better sourced articles. Likewise, search for native-language sources if the subject has a name in a non-Latin alphabet (such as Japanese or Greek), which is often in the lead.
C. Consider whether the article could be improved rather than deleted
  1. If the article can be fixed through normal editing, then it is not a candidate for RfD.
  2. If the article was recently created, please consider allowing the contributors more time to develop the article.
  3. If an article has issues try first raising your concerns on the article's talk page, with the main contributors, and/or adding a cleanup tag, such as {{notability}}, {{hoax}}, {{original research}}, or {{advert}}; this ensures readers are aware of the problem and may act to fix it.
  4. If the topic is not important enough to merit an article on its own, consider merging or redirecting to an existing article. This should be done particularly if the topic name is a likely search term.
D. Search for additional sources, if the main concern is notability
  1. The minimum search expected is a normal Google search, a Google Books search, a Google News search, and a Google News archive search; Google Scholar is suggested for academic subjects.
  2. If you find a lack of sources, you've completed basic due diligence before nominating. However, if a quick search does find sources, this does not always mean an RfD on a sourcing basis is unwarranted. If you spend more time examining the sources, and determine that they are insufficient, e.g., because they only contain passing mention of the topic, then an RfD nomination may still be appropriate.
  3. If you find that adequate sources do appear to exist, the fact that they are not yet present in the article is not a proper basis for a nomination. Instead, you should consider citing the sources, or at minimum apply an appropriate template to the page that flags the sourcing concern. Common templates include {{unreferenced}}, {{refimprove}}, {{third-party}}, {{primary sources}} and {{one source}}.

Discussed deletion

Put the deletion tag on the article.
  1. Click "Change source" at the top of the page to be deleted.
  2. In the edit box, add this tag: {{rfd|REASON}}. Put it at the top of the page, above the rest of the text. Then, replace the text "REASON" with a short reason why the page should be deleted. Do not be too specific here. You can add more details on the discussion page (see below).
    • It is a good idea to write a change summary to let others know what you are doing. You can say "nominating for deletion", "requesting deletion", or something like that.
  3. Click "Save changes" at the bottom to save the page with the deletion tag at the top.
    • You can also check the "Watch this page" check box to add the page to your watchlist. This lets you know if the page for deletion has been changed. If the deletion tag is removed any time before the discussion is closed, it should be put back.
Create a discussion page.
  1. If the deletion tag has been added to the page, a box should appear at the top of the article with a link saying "Click here to create a discussion page!" Click that link.
  2. You should be taken to a page starting with "Creating Wikipedia:Requests for deletion/Requests/..." along with the current year and the name of the article to be deleted. In the edit box, the following tag should have already been added: {{RfD/Preload/Template}} . Replace the text PLACE REASON HERE with a more detailed reason why the page should be deleted.
    • It is helpful to include links to the various policy pages about Wikipedia (that begin with Wikipedia:). Here are some examples of this: "This article is [[Wikipedia:COMPLEX|not easy to understand]]" or "Not a [[Wikipedia:notable|notable]] topic''. This will make others more aware of why the page is not acceptable under Wikipedia's policies.
  3. Click "Save changes" to save the new discussion page when you are done.
    • A change summary you can write for this page is "creating discussion page", "starting deletion discussion", or something like that.
    • As with the page for deletion, you can check the "Watch the page" box. This will let you know if someone else has replied to your discussion.
List it here
  1. Copy the title of the discussion page to the clipboard. You can do this by dragging the mouse over the text from "Wikipedia" to the end of the page title to highlight it, then right-clicking and selecting "Copy".
  2. Go to the list of deletion requests, and click "change source" beside the words "Current deletion request discussions".
  3. At the top of the list of discussions, paste the title from the clipboard (right-click and select "Paste"). Add a pair of curly brackets before and after the title to make a template that will copy the content of the discussion page onto the main deletion page, like this:
    {{Wikipedia:Requests for deletion/Requests/2026/(name of page to be deleted)}}
  4. Finally, click "Save changes" to add the discussion to the list. If the page saves successfully, you should see your deletion discussion at the top of the list. And that's it!

If this is too complicated for you, there are some gadgets like Twinkle that you can use. This allows you to do it faster.

Quick deletion

If you think a page has nonsense content, add {{non}} to the top of the page.

If you think a page does not say why the subject is important, add {{notable}} to the top of the page.

If you think a page should be deleted per other quick deletion rules, add {{QD|reason}} to the top of the page.

Notifying the user

Generally, you should try to be civil and tell the user that created the page to join the discussion talking about the page. This can be done by adding {{subst:RFDNote|page to be deleted}} ~~~~ to the bottom of their talkpage.

Discussions

  • The discussion is not a vote. Please make suggestions on what action to take, and support your suggestion with reasons.
  • Please look at the article before you make a suggestion. Do not make an opinion using only the information given by the nominator. Looking at the history of the article may help to understand the situation.
  • Please read other comments and suggestions. They may have helpful information.
  • Start your comments or suggestions on a new line. Start with * and sign after your comment by adding ~~~~ to the end. If you are responding to another editor, put your comment directly below theirs and make sure your comment is indented (using more than one *).
  • New users can make suggestions, but their ideas may not be considered, especially if the suggestion seems to be made in bad faith. The opinion of users who had an account before the start of the request may be given more weight or importance.
  • Suggestions by users using "sock puppets" (more than one account belonging to the same person) will not be counted.
  • Please make only one suggestion. If you change your mind, change your first idea instead of adding a new one. The best way to do this is to put <s> before your old idea and </s> after it. For example, if you wanted to delete an article but now think it should be kept, you could put: "Delete keep".
  • If you would like an article to be kept, you can improve the article and try to fix the problems given in the request for deletion. If the reasons given in the nomination are fixed by changing, the nomination can be withdrawn by the nominator, and the deletion discussion will be closed by an administrator.
  • Try to avoid confusing suggestions, such as delete and merge.
  • Requests for deletion is not a war zone. You can click here for more information, although the page is not in Simple English.

Remember: You do not have to make a suggestion for every nomination. You should think about not making a suggestion if:

  1. A nomination involves a topic that you do not know much about.
  2. Everyone has made the same suggestion and you agree with that suggestion.
  • All times are in UTC.

Current deletion request discussions


A taxonomy of wikihabitants

A taxonomy of wikihabitants (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

Passengerpigeon has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Joke page, and duplicate of Wikipedia:WikiFauna. Passengerpigeon (talk) 16:54, 31 October 2026 (UTC)

And as for “ duplicate “ I wld like to refrain from that ( even tho maybe it is) but ye I did tried to rework them and give more unique touch Urieal (talk) 04:06, 1 November 2026 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

  • Delete - no evidence of any real world notability and unsourced Spiderone (talk) 17:25, 31 October 2026 (UTC)
    Well yes but I tried new and yeh just as creative gimmick after reading wikifauna ( but I had some new by myself) . I do will vouch or well won’t hinder much on deletion Urieal (talk) 02:21, 1 November 2026 (UTC)
    Well, if you like the idea of the WikiFauna page you should add more to it; main article space is not the place for Wikipedia in-jokes. Passengerpigeon (talk) 14:40, 1 November 2026 (UTC)
    YEH yeh yeh.. HOPE this thing gets to be on BJDON...
    and i did Add my own wikifauna there..
    but the thing is ( as i said in talk thread) i came to know about it after i publish this...
    and ye it may have names of wikifaunas... but the discription is entirely unique.. and i recomend to read the page WHOLE Urieal (talk) 16:19, 1 November 2026 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 16:54, 7 November 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Russian name

Russian name (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

MakaylaHippo1998 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: No real reason to exist with its content, no sources or other languages for this page. MakaylaHippo1998 (talk) 23:32, 28 October 2026 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion


This request is due to close on 23:32, 4 November 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


List of New England Patriots players

List of New England Patriots players (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

MakaylaHippo1998 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: No reason for this list to exist, first, no other team in any professional sports league has their own list, second it is only five players from 2012 and of those chosen five, only Tom Brady has a page on this wiki, basically this list is completely unnecessary, expanding it would make it too long. MakaylaHippo1998 (talk) 23:07, 28 October 2026 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion


This request is due to close on 23:07, 4 November 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


JBMW Media (Television company)

JBMW Media (Television company) (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

Spiderone has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Company that does not meet WP:GNG. I have searched online but can't find anything better than the sources already cited, which are clearly inadequate. Please note that this was deleted 6 times recently under JBMW Media, the correct title for this topic, which is now protected from creation. If this company is somehow notable, then I request an admin to move it to the correct title after this RfD closes. Spiderone (talk) 14:37, 26 October 2026 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion


This request is due to close on 14:37, 2 November 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Aiman Valoryn

Aiman Valoryn (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

Ighs has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: The person this article is about it's notable enough for a Wikipedia page. There are no real news articles about him. and the sources are from fake news websites. Ighs (talk) 15:47, 3 September 2026 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

  • Keep - I object because it references many legitimate sources from other language wikis.YazzFlower (talk) 14:55, 7 October 2026 (UTC)
  • Keep - On the Malay & English Wikipedia, he has valid references.Ahmadyarifan (talk) 15:01, 7 October 2026 (UTC)
  • Delete per nom and referred to consensus on IDWiki and ENWiki. 🅷🅴🅽🆁🅸 Talk ✉ 16:11, 8 October 2026 (UTC)
  • Delete Per nom. X-wiki spam --NDG (talk) 08:15, 15 October 2026 (UTC)
  •  Delete*No credible claim of importance; no independent news coverage NusaEditor (talk) 02:44, 26 October 2026 (UTC)
  •  Delete Junk sources, nothing to show they meet notability guidelines. Ravensfire (talk) 04:36, 26 October 2026 (UTC)
  • Administrator note: This request was not transcluded to the Wikipedia:Requests for deletion page until today, and so the due closure date has been changed accordingly. --Ferien (talk | join TBA!) 22:30, 26 October 2026 (UTC)
  •  Delete Cross wiki spam. Almost all language versions have since been deleted. Ziv (talk) 10:57, 27 October 2026 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 15:47, 10 September 2026 (UTC) 04:39, 2 November 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Category:Drafts with categories

Category:Drafts with categories (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

Auntof6 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: This wiki doesn't have drafts, so we shouldn't need this category. Auntof6 (talk) 13:11, 24 October 2026 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

Creator comment: This category is a tracking category meant for userspace drafts using Template:Userspace draft, which this wiki does have. Probably could be renamed to be clearer though. FlammablePizza (talk / contrib) 13:17, 24 October 2026 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 13:11, 31 October 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Neeru Yadav Hockeywali Sarpanch

Neeru Yadav Hockeywali Sarpanch (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

Ferien has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fails WP:GNG. Quickly deleted about a year ago now but sent to DRV with no opposition to restoration. I still don't think there is enough coverage. --Ferien (talk | join TBA!) 16:35, 18 October 2026 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

  • Keep. The office by itself would not be enough under WP:POLITICIAN, but this subject now has substantial independent coverage beyond routine election reporting, including a dedicated India Today profile and coverage from NDTV. That is enough to make a reasonable WP:GNG case, so the article should be improved and sourced rather than deleted. Nilperist (talk) 06:44, 24 October 2026 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 16:35, 25 October 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Edward J. Crawford

Edward J. Crawford (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

Kqol has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Deleted at the English Wikipedia twice on this same sourcing: 2019 and 2024. Created here on 19 August 2024, two months after that second deletion, by Lionsonny, blocked there as a sockpuppet of a paid-editing operation (en:Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Expertwikiguy) Kqol (talk) 22:13, 31 October 2026 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion


This request is due to close on 22:13, 7 November 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Erik Felderhof

Erik Felderhof (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

Kqol has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: The 2025 request closed as no consensus on a single keep, from Darrenchant — blocked on the English Wikipedia as a sockpuppet of a paid-editing operation (en:Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Expertwikiguy). The English Wikipedia deleted this article on 7 April 2024 with "Obvious WP:COI or WP:PAY self-promotional article, as the subject has next-to-zero notability and only the barest of mentions in reliable sources". The sourcing here is the same Kqol (talk) 22:20, 31 October 2026 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion


This request is due to close on 22:20, 7 November 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Malfoy Girl

Malfoy Girl (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

~2026-57739-67 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Does not show Wikipedia:Notability ~2026-57739-67 (talk) 09:27, 1 November 2026 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

  • Delete if article isn't rewritten to Basic English --~2026-57739-67 (talk) 09:50, 1 November 2026 (UTC)
    Keep: I rewrote it to basic English for you. You can make edits to it yourself too. ~2026-57914-10 (talk) 15:44, 1 November 2026 (UTC)
    The opening text is still stacking several concepts and ideas together. In Simple English this is supposed to be broken into two or three short sentences with one idea or concept each. ~2026-56416-04 (talk) 19:26, 1 November 2026 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 09:27, 8 November 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Recently closed deletion discussions

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further changes should be made to this discussion.

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete. Ternera (talk) 19:12, 28 October 2026 (UTC)

Novanawazilion

Novanawazilion (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

Spiderone has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fails WP:GNG potentially. I couldn't find anything when searching online other than self-published content. The papers linked are by Nawaz Uddin himself and Blogspot is unreliable. Spiderone (talk) 13:19, 21 October 2026 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

  • Delete. I am not seeing reliable, independent sources that discuss this term in any depth. The creator's own publications may verify that he proposed it, but they do not establish notability under WP:GNG. Nilperist (talk) 06:40, 24 October 2026 (UTC)
  • Delete like the rest of this project by the author. Same issues here --NDG (talk) 08:28, 25 October 2026 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 13:19, 28 October 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further changes should be made to this discussion.

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete. Ternera (talk) 19:10, 28 October 2026 (UTC)

Decnawazilion

Decnawazilion (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

Spiderone has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fails WP:GNG potentially. I couldn't find anything when searching online other than self-published content and a YouTube video uploaded by Project Namkaran itself. The papers linked are by Nawaz Uddin himself and Blogspot is unreliable. This is no more notable than if I made up a number and called it 'Spideronezillion' Spiderone (talk) 13:24, 21 October 2026 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

It seems as if the editor may be using an unreliable journal article written by himself as a source. I concur with what the nomination editor has written above. Barbara (talk) 18:43, 21 October 2026 (UTC)

  • Delete. A paper written by the term's creator and other self-published material cannot establish independent notability. I found no solid secondary coverage that would satisfy WP:GNG or WP:RS. Nilperist (talk) 06:37, 24 October 2026 (UTC)
  • Delete like the rest of this project by the author. Same issues here --NDG (talk) 08:26, 25 October 2026 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 13:24, 28 October 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further changes should be made to this discussion.

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete. Ternera (talk) 19:09, 28 October 2026 (UTC)

Quinawazilion

Quinawazilion (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

Spiderone has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fails WP:GNG imho. I couldn't find anything when searching online other than self-published content and a YouTube video uploaded by Project Namkaran itself. The papers linked are by Nawaz Uddin himself and Blogspot is unreliable. This is no more notable than if I made up a number and called it 'Spideronezillion' Spiderone (talk) 13:25, 21 October 2026 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

If you found poorly verifiable sources, then I concur with your nomination for deletion. Perhaps this is even a hoax. Barbara (talk) 18:38, 21 October 2026 (UTC)

  • Delete. The sources I can find all trace back to the person or project promoting the term. Without significant coverage in reliable, independent sources, this does not meet WP:GNG. Nilperist (talk) 06:34, 24 October 2026 (UTC)
  • Delete like the rest of this project by the author. Same issues here --NDG (talk) 08:25, 25 October 2026 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 13:25, 28 October 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further changes should be made to this discussion.

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete.  --Ferien (talk | join TBA!) 22:31, 26 October 2026 (UTC)

Template:2026 elections in Russia

Template:2026 elections in Russia (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

Minorax has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Red-linked template. Unused. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 09:18, 18 October 2026 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

  • Looks like a collection of red-links. Also, given our editor base, I doubt we have a large number of editors who want to populate that. So, if the template is unused, we should delete it--Eptalon (talk) 15:31, 18 October 2026 (UTC)
  • Unpopulated, so delete --NDG (talk) 11:43, 19 October 2026 (UTC)
  • Delete. This is an unused navigation template made up almost entirely of red links. Since it does not help readers move among existing articles, it has no present navigational value and can be recreated if the underlying pages are written. Nilperist (talk) 06:58, 24 October 2026 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 09:18, 25 October 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further changes should be made to this discussion.

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete. No participation but this is essentially an A1 case. --Ferien (talk | join TBA!) 22:28, 26 October 2026 (UTC)

Reichskommissariat

Reichskommissariat (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

Barbara (WVS) has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: I could find no source that described Reichskommissariat as puppets. In addition enWikipedia defines this term quite differently as a 'administrative entity'. Barbara (talk) 21:52, 18 October 2026 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion


This request is due to close on 21:52, 25 October 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.