Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Archives/2025-01

Accounts around Cerebrum IQ

I'm listing up the accounts involved in the recreation of this page which was previously marked as QD A4 and G11 (deleted by Fr33kman). Please also note that the 1st user also uploaded a related file at Commons. MathXplore (talk) 13:53, 2 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed fr33kman 17:38, 2 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
This section was archived on a request by: BRP ever 11:39, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Battle of Hamek

These two new editors started working on the article Battle of Hamek on the same day. Both created on the same day. After requesting the article for deletion, the second account started to work on it.  Looks like a duck to me Cactus🌵 spiky ツ 09:01, 2 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please note that this page has been quickly deleted for 4 times. I will also add Frankthewiki (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · SUL · CA · checkuser (log)) who is also involved in the recreation of this article with doubted notability & zero references. MathXplore (talk) 13:36, 2 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
When I ran a check on the first two above, they wewre from different countries, and used different browsers. Haven't checked Frankthewiki yet, also need ot do a proxy check. Eptalon (talk) 09:52, 3 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Dont you think its a bit wierd? Cactus🌵 spiky ツ 10:08, 3 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
They are technically unrelated. BRP ever 17:53, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
This section was archived on a request by: BRP ever 17:53, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Accounts around Pamela Furr and Pamela_N._Furr

I'm listing up the accounts that are involved in the recreation of the articles above, they have slightly different titles but handle the same subject. The 1st user is blocked by Bsadowski1, the 2nd to the 4th user is blocked by BRPever in Wikipedia:Requests_for_checkuser/Archives/2024-11#Editors_removing_QD/RFD_templates_from_Pamela_N._Furr. The new user in question (5th user) has a direct overlap with the 1st user, and can be considered as a possible WP:EVASION. MathXplore (talk) 15:06, 2 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Not confirmed fr33kman 17:33, 2 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
This section was archived on a request by: BRP ever 17:38, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Accounts vandalizing Xinjiang Campaign of 1871–1877

Both accounts are vandalizing Xinjiang Campaign of 1871–1877. It seems they are either sockpuppets or meatpuppets but they're abusing accounts to vandalize. 2601:644:907E:A70:4D8F:73EF:8E4A:F490 (talk) 02:01, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Not confirmed fr33kman 19:17, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
This section was archived on a request by: BRP ever 01:26, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Shamim Hossen voters

These two users have voted keep on the Shamim Hossen RfD, but have no edits outside this topic. Both accounts were recently created here. 2601:644:907E:A70:813C:75D5:AE3B:72C0 (talk) 20:14, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Both are blocked so I only checked to see if there were any sleepers, there aren't. fr33kman 19:15, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
This section was archived on a request by: BRP ever 01:27, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Accounts at UAPP.AI

Please note that both users have many QD G11 submissions, and their activities overlap at this article which was deleted by Fr33kman. MathXplore (talk) 01:51, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Technically Red X Unrelated to one another.--BRP ever 12:11, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
This section was archived on a request by: BRP ever 23:44, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Accounts at International Youth Development Foundation

Possible WP:EVASION. The 1st user is the author of the article and they are CU-blocked by Bsadowski1. After the block, new users have gathered at the page to continue previous works. MathXplore (talk) 12:17, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Doing...--BRP ever 12:26, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Done Looks like a big group of UPEs. Lihua0721 is technically Red X Unrelated based on my check.

The accounts listed above are between  Likely to  Confirmed and have been blocked based on technical and behavioral similarity.--BRP ever 12:51, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This section was archived on a request by: BRP ever 23:44, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Accounts around WikiAlpha and their founder

I'm reporting possible WP:EVASION around this subject. The 1st to the 3rd user are confirmed in Wikipedia:Requests_for_checkuser/Archives/2024-12#Accounts_around_WikiAlpha_and_David_Balondemu. The 4th and 5th user are named after the founder of WikiAlpha. Recently, a new user (6th user) has appeared in a relevant article ([1]), and that is their first move in this project. MathXplore (talk) 22:26, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

As per WP:DUCK and CU the 4th and 5th users are confirmed. The 6th is not confirmed. fr33kman 19:13, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Fr33kman: I have an update about this request. A new user (Raiyyan Lipu Tahsan (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · SUL · CA · checkuser (log))) has appeared at WikiAlpha, please see Special:AbuseLog/561208, Special:AbuseLog/561209, and Special:AbuseLog/561210 for their movements. MathXplore (talk) 06:43, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Not confirmed fr33kman 09:14, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
This section was archived on a request by: BRP ever 01:34, 11 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Users at Battle of Tinos Strait

I'm listing up the users around this suspected hoax (Wikipedia:Requests for deletion/Requests/2025/Battle of Tinos Strait). The 1st and 2nd user is already listed up in w:Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Albanian atdhetar (as well as KomandantJashari (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · SUL · CA · checkuser (log)), another active related user). Please also note that we had an IP user voting in the related RFD (Special:Diff/10000429). In addition, I estimate that the 3rd user abused logout edits at Siege of Kastelorrizo. Creation of hoax is unacceptable, making complex pages is not OK, and doing these with many accounts/IPs is unacceptable. Our CUs should judge if this activity is OK or not. MathXplore (talk) 02:25, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

User agents appear the same but IPs are all different. I'd suggest acting on behaviour rather than CU data as I can't confirm at this time. fr33kman 09:23, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
This section was archived on a request by: BRP ever 13:44, 13 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

More users at Battle of Hamek

Possible WP:EVASION at this article. The 1st user is blocked by BRPever and they are the author of the article. The 2nd user appeared after the block and recreated the page. MathXplore (talk) 23:45, 11 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Technically Red X Unrelated--BRP ever 04:26, 12 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
This section was archived on a request by: BRP ever 13:44, 13 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Accounts around Qajar-Wahhabi_War_(1808-1811)

I'm listing the accounts involved in the recreation of this page despite RFD consensus at Wikipedia:Requests for deletion/Requests/2024/Qajar-Wahhabi War (1808-1811) and repeated QD G4 cases (deleted by me and Fr33kman). Please note that the 2nd user had a 72-hour block by Chenzw from December 31st (UTC), and the 1st user made edits during that term. If confirmed, then this is also WP:EVASION. MathXplore (talk) 13:32, 2 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Technically Red X Unrelated.-- BRP ever 10:12, 17 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
This section was archived on a request by: BRP ever 10:27, 17 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Users at Larry Cermak

I'm listing up accounts around this page. The 1st user is the author of Larry Cermak and w:Draft:Larry Cermak. After its deletion due to the RFD (Wikipedia:Requests for deletion/Requests/2025/Larry Cermak), the 2nd user has appeared for its recreation. Please also note that there was an IP that appeared for the RFD (Special:Diff/10007050). MathXplore (talk) 13:42, 13 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Technically Red X Unrelated-- BRP ever 10:18, 17 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
This section was archived on a request by: BRP ever 10:27, 17 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Users at Wahhabi war and Battle of Qara-Hamid

Possible WP:EVASION. The new user (3rd user) has activity overlap at Wahhabi war with the 1st user, and another activity overlap at Battle of Qara-Hamid with the 2nd user. MathXplore (talk) 22:15, 14 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Two accounts are already blocked/locked. 999666542p is  Confirmed with Xiongnu.Turkic.--BRP ever 10:26, 17 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
This section was archived on a request by: BRP ever 10:27, 17 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Users at Mario Nawfal

The 1st user is the original author of the article, and it was deleted as suspected self-promotion per RFD (Wikipedia:Requests for deletion/Requests/2025/Mario Nawfal). After the deletion, the 2nd user has appeared to restore the possible self-promotion. MathXplore (talk) 07:32, 17 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Both accounts are blocked/locked. The sleepers are also blocked/locked.-- BRP ever 10:30, 17 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
This section was archived on a request by: BRP ever 10:30, 17 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Users at Ayaz Syed

The 1st user is blocked by Fehufanga due to RFD disruption at Wikipedia:Requests for deletion/Requests/2025/Ayaz Syed, and the 2nd user is the author of the article. I guess that the 2nd user aims the page incubation and the 1st user aims to confuse the RFD. Once confirmed, both users should be removed from the project. For relevant IP users, please see special:diff/10017660 and special:diff/10017669. MathXplore (talk) 08:46, 17 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Confirmed and blocked with a sleeper. BRP ever 10:37, 17 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
This section was archived on a request by: BRP ever 10:37, 17 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Users at Siege of Tabriz and Battle of Tabriz

Possible WP:EVASION. The 1st user (already blocked) made Battle of Tabriz. The 2nd user recreated this as Siege of Tabriz. MathXplore (talk) 23:35, 17 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Technically Red X Unrelated. Okanthegreat90 and Okanthegreat91 are the same. Thanks, BRP ever 12:22, 18 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
This section was archived on a request by: BRP ever 10:46, 19 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

New users at Wikipedia:Requests for deletion/Requests/2025/Joanna Modes

Possible vote-stacking at this RFD. I'm listing up the new users at Wikipedia:Requests for deletion/Requests/2025/Joanna Modes. Please see Special:Diff/10021091 from the 1st user, Special:Diff/10021131 from the 2nd user, and Special:Diff/10021222 from the 3rd user. Please also see the IPs at this RFD. MathXplore (talk) 13:20, 18 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please also note that 231wea (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · SUL · CA · checkuser (log)) is the author of Joanna Modes. MathXplore (talk) 13:23, 18 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
New editors all on the same RFD? At best it's WP:MEAT puppetry. Ravensfire (talk) 18:13, 18 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Couldn't find technical relation. This is probably one of those cases where link gets posted in a social media group or something similar and attracts attention.--BRP ever 10:46, 19 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This section was archived on a request by: BRP ever 15:59, 19 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Recent users at Dhadhor

Possible WP:EVASION. The 1st user has made many edits to Dhadhor including their previous accounts (Wikipedia:Requests_for_checkuser/Archives/2024-09#Dhadhor_accounts_again, Wikipedia:Requests_for_checkuser/Archives/2024-06#Dhadhor_accounts). Soon after the block of the 1st user, the 2nd user has appeared on the same page (special:diff/10021180, special:diff/10021184). Please also compare Special:Diff/10021186, special:diff/10021184 (by the 2nd user) and special:diff/10020955, from the 1st user. MathXplore (talk) 12:58, 18 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Both are locked for long-term abuse so closing this one.-- BRP ever 11:16, 21 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
This section was archived on a request by: BRP ever 11:17, 21 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

account starts with 'Suhaib-Mahdi'


Similar username, possible sockpuppet, all vandalism only and clearly not here to build an encyclopedia, might be a type of (new?) LTA, also would be good if we can find some sleepers. cc@MathXplore: --Aqurs1 (talk) 10:20, 20 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Suhaib-Mahdi16 and Suhaib-Mahdi15 are  Confirmed. Suhaib-Mahdi 19, Suhaib-Mahdi 18, and Suhaib-Mahdi17 are confirmed. Both groups and Suhaib-Mahdi 20 are likely related to one another. Other accounts aren't registered on simplewiki for check. BRP ever 12:59, 20 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
This section was archived on a request by: BRP ever 11:14, 21 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Joanna Modes RfD Accounts

All of these accounts I found at the above RfD. They were created today with their only edits being voting to keep in the above discussion.- FusionSub (Talk page) (Contributions) 11:40, 22 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Confirmed and blocked. BRP ever 11:46, 22 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
This section was archived on a request by: BRP ever 11:45, 22 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

PotsdamLamb

Similar convo, similar format. Here i go with Checkuser request [Benefit of the Doubt]. Qylt (talk) 00:04, 23 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

There's only one person that needs to be CU'd here and it's not Pots, Ade or BZPN. –Davey2010Talk 00:06, 23 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
You're free to do it but my CU request still matters Davey and remeber and remember that you're not a CU clerk nor do you have the right to checkusers. Stop commenting here. Qylt (talk) 00:11, 23 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Decline, zero need fr33kman 00:36, 23 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Why zero need ? did you checked it? Qylt (talk) 00:50, 23 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@BRPever could you double-check it? It is unclear why it was declined and what "zero needs" means. Qylt (talk) 00:56, 23 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I declined because a) it's a fishing trip and they are not allowed, and b) I have known each of the users for ages and have no reason to suspect them of being a single person. You, however, are totally new to me and I disagree with your supposition that any sock puppetry is going on here. So, no, I will not check them. fr33kman 03:51, 23 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Come on now, this check is unnecessary. You give zero good reason to perform a check. Fr33kman is 100% correct here.--BRP ever 04:44, 23 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
This section was archived on a request by: BRP ever 04:45, 23 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

User:Ayngelato and Ayngelato

I'm listing up the users around this subject. The 1st user made an autobiographic user page in their userspace and it was deleted due to QD G11 by Fr33kman. The 2nd user made the same subject in the main space and this was also deleted (Ayngelato). MathXplore (talk) 23:44, 22 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed and blocked fr33kman 00:34, 23 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
This section was archived on a request by: BRP ever 06:15, 25 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

LesbianOfficial

Continuted vandalism on the page Vernon Scannell within the same timeframe.[2] Qylt (talk) 12:30, 24 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
 Looks like a duck to me. No check needed, looks like VOA that can be simply blocked if they continue. BRP ever 06:19, 25 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
This section was archived on a request by: BRP ever 09:30, 27 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

HassanHussainOfficial

Jacksonjack24 is CU blocked on enwiki as a HHO sock, previous socks of HHO have been blocked here (QuranNazim, for example). I realize the CU data is probably stale, hence mentioning the CU block and noting that here Jacksonjack24 has recreated Pir Syed Nazim Hussain Shah which has been previously G5'd [3] and is one of the most common articles for HHO socks. Ravensfire (talk) 16:34, 25 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Already blocked so I see no nerd for a check at this time fr33kman 21:48, 27 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

QuranNazim

This section was archived on a request by: BRP ever 04:29, 29 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Users at VidLii

Possible WP:EVASION. I'm listing up the users involved in the recreation of this page despite previous RFDs. The 1st user made this page (special:redirect/logid/2850503), and they have a block based on username issues. The 2nd user made many edits here (Special:DeletedContributions/Sussywidget). The 3rd user is the latest user who recreated this 2 times (Special:DeletedContributions/Zetrykal) and made another edit related to the article (w:en:special:diff/1271833883). MathXplore (talk) 11:55, 26 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Not confirmed fr33kman 21:52, 27 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
This section was archived on a request by: BRP ever 04:29, 29 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

User:KENNY BzY and User:Finnex de star

The 1st user has made a biography of the 2nd user in their own userpage, and the context of the 1st user's user page ([4]) suggests that these users are related to each other in real world. Please also see the following abuse filter logs:

These logs show that the 1st user tried to edit the userpage of the 2nd user. MathXplore (talk) 23:28, 18 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

(Non-administrator observation) It seems like that Finnex de Star is the sock of user KENNY BzY, or I may be wrong here, because sometimes I don't know as much. But the Abuse log shows that they definitely tried to edit another user's page. I don't really know if it counts as sockpuppetry or not. 𝓐𝓭𝓮𝓵𝓪𝓲𝓭𝓮 (𝓽𝓪𝓵𝓴 ♡ 𝓬𝓸𝓷𝓽𝓻𝓲𝓫𝓼) 23:32, 18 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I ran a check, and I have to say that with the infos I have, I cannot prove they are ther same user. They are from the same country, but they use different ISPs, so their IP addresses are different. Their bowsers are, too. So, from a CU point of view: no match,sorry Eptalon (talk) 15:58, 19 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Eptalon: I have found more users related to these QD G11 and w:WP:NOTWEBHOST cases.
This user also caused a QD G11 case in their userpage and the 1st user also edited here. Please see the deleted revisions of user:Favy rexha.
This user tried to edit the userpage of the 1st user. Please see Special:AbuseLog/563380 and Special:AbuseLog/563381. MathXplore (talk) 02:27, 20 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
i actually gave him the access to my Wikipedia account so let him login Finnex de star (talk) 20:49, 19 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Finnex de star, Please read en:WP:ROLE - Accounts must be used by one person and one person only, Sharing accounts will get you banned, Thanks, –Davey2010Talk 20:57, 19 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Administrator note: 1st user is blocked due to repeated QD G11 cases. MathXplore (talk) 02:21, 20 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Administrator note: Deleted content of User:Bhadboi jozzylee suggests that this user is related to the 1st and 2nd user. MathXplore (talk) 08:47, 20 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
This section was archived on a request by: BRP ever 04:36, 24 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://simple.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_checkuser/Archives/2025-01&oldid=10156569"
Uses material from the Wikipedia article Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Archives/2025-01, released under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license.