Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Archives/2025-04

Brownwatter

These two accounts were created 4 minutes apart on Simple, and both voted to keep at Wikipedia:Requests for deletion/Requests/2025/Joaquin Valdepenas. The only possibilities are: they know each other in real life, or they are sockpuppets. TagUser (talk) 16:44, 4 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Confirmed and blocked, also Alignmentario. Vermont (🐿️—🏳️‍🌈) 03:23, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Apointario is  Confirmed to Pancemental, both now blocked (probably UPE), and  Possible to the three above accounts. Vermont (🐿️—🏳️‍🌈) 03:30, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
This section was archived on a request by: BRP ever 20:40, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

New request

HistorianAlferedo is a sock or I have doubt.? Account was created after Sarcastic was blocked. These are some proofs that will help in CU.

1. Thakur he restored same content was added by Sarcastic kshatriya and his sock.[1][2][3]

2. Kshatriya he edited main lead and similar to previous socks.[4][5][6]

3. Blanking article that was vandalised by Sarcastic.[7][8]

4. Editing Porus that was created by Sarcastic kshatriya.[9] Bensebgli (talk) 20:45, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Not confirmed fr33kman 22:58, 7 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
This section was archived on a request by: BRP ever 00:28, 10 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Emily Galaviz users

On 15 March, Ldya124 created Emily Galaviz, On the 15th it was nominated for deletion at Wikipedia:Requests for deletion/Requests/2025/Emily Galaviz and on the 16th Lspa234 commented on the RFD[10], Since then it's been quiet until today when Ldya124 recreates the Emily Galaviz article [11]

Obvious socking is obvious, Thanks, –Davey2010Talk 22:26, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

And after writing this, they've jumped back on the Lspa account and are removing the QD template[12], Thanks, –Davey2010Talk 22:34, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
They match, and have been bloved, in accordance with regulations... Eptalon (talk) 19:41, 7 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
This section was archived on a request by: BRP ever 00:28, 10 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

New request

Similar writing style and behavioural pattern, featuring aggressive edit warring in related articles that happens in spates. The suspected sock master appears to be continuing the same behaviour with the top account, and feigning ignorance when being reminded of the rules. Steven1991 (talk) 23:07, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked a few more socks fr33kman 23:03, 7 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
This section was archived on a request by: BRP ever 00:28, 10 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Users at ALLI TALESI

Please note that the 1st user is the author of the article, and the 2nd user removed RFD tag from there (special:diff/10172730). MathXplore (talk) 23:26, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Both users matched, so there is another round of free blocks for everone. Eptalon (talk) 19:33, 7 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
This section was archived on a request by: BRP ever 00:28, 10 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

mwcarpets.com users

Please note that all of these users are using the same link ([13], special:diff/10179331, special:diff/10164473, special:diff/10135364). MathXplore (talk) 10:18, 9 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Done (w:Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Sadequain Foundation USA). MathXplore (talk) 13:28, 9 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
This section was archived on a request by: BRP ever 00:29, 10 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This is based on Special:Diff/10174195 (1st report) and Special:Diff/10175456 (2nd report). The 1st user was warned about link issues and explained their actions as an enwiki copy-paste (Special:Diff/10166292, Special:Diff/10174510). After warnings and the 1st report to the 1st user, the 2nd user appeared and started adding links with the same reason (special:diff/10175385). MathXplore (talk) 13:41, 9 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Technically Red X Unrelated.-- BRP ever 00:47, 10 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hi @BRPever, Disappointed but not surprised, Can they still be blocked for spamming as Enterstellar added a link to dotdashmeredith[14] and Mavic Adam added a link to secomart.com[15] and boostgrams.com[16], Dotdash and Boost have both been spammed here repeatedly[17][18] and no one inserts the homepage of a spam cite amongst cites randomly. I'm all for assuming good faith but it's not like they randomly inserted a BBC news piece in the wrong place (or used an incorrect news cite altogether), Thanks, –Davey2010Talk 01:09, 10 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for blocking BRP much appreciated, Thanks, –Davey2010Talk 01:25, 10 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, no worries. That looks like good/bad edits with some link spam mixed in. BRP ever 01:26, 10 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
This section was archived on a request by: BRP ever 01:27, 10 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Users prefixed with Mishrasaket

Please note that these users with a similar username are using their userspace for autobiographic uses (please see User:Mishrasaket and special:permalink/10177359). MathXplore (talk) 10:14, 9 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@MathXplore  Looks like a duck to me. I don't think check is necessary. I'd say just warn them for now. BRP ever 00:35, 10 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
This section was archived on a request by: BRP ever 12:45, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Enwiki sock farm moved to other wikimedia projects

Longtime sock master with a record of non-stop socking and disruption, please see w:Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/ANZER.AYOUB/Archive. Now he has decided to move to other wikimedia projects to continue his disruption, see for example revision history of Chenabi (he created this article purely out of original research on enwiki where it was deleted if I remember correctly). There are likely more socks of his. UnpetitproleX (talk) 20:17, 10 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed username. MathXplore (talk) 22:09, 10 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Also add
which is an example of classic ANZER.AYOUB impersonation attempt targeted at me (see multiple other such impersonation examples in w:Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/ANZER.AYOUB/Archive). This account appeared at this Chenab Times RfD to vote keep for an article created by Yousuf Soz. UnpetitproleX (talk) 18:56, 11 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
+
blocked sock of ANZER.AYOUB on enwiki, appeared at RfD of another Yousuf Soz article to vote keep. UnpetitproleX (talk) 10:09, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed plus found a sock farm and blocked them. fr33kman 09:21, 14 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Fr33kman: thanks for blocking the sock farm, I think you've missed USer:Anzer Ayoob and User:VandikaRai. UnpetitproleX (talk) 09:31, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Done, thanks for pinging me. Regards fr33kman 22:49, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
This section was archived on a request by: Eptalon (talk) 09:08, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Users at Reconquest of Lalish

Elih Wiki, Alrman and - Elih me confirmed each other on enwiki. [19] Apocular created the same article that Elih Wiki created on enwiki, after Elih Wiki was blocked. I cannot add a diff because the Draft article created by Elih Wiki was deleted on enwiki. Kajmer05 (talk) 10:46, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed fr33kman 19:06, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
FYI diffs are still useful since we can get relevant info from them and also some simplewiki admins are either also enwiki admins or stewards so can see the contents regardless. fr33kman 22:53, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
This section was archived on a request by: Eptalon (talk) 09:09, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Users at Seydanil

The 1st user is the initial author of the article. After Wikipedia:Requests for deletion/Requests/2025/Seydanil, the 2nd user has recreated the page and also removed the QD tag (special:diff/10194770). MathXplore (talk) 13:29, 16 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed fr33kman 17:48, 16 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
This section was archived on a request by: Eptalon (talk) 09:15, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Users at Hamed Mirani

The 1st user made this page and the 2nd user joined later, and this was deleted by Fr33kman. After the QD A4 deletion, the 2nd user recreated this page. MathXplore (talk) 12:16, 19 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed fr33kman 22:17, 19 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Fr33kman: After the CU, a new user FutsalNorthWest (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · SUL · CA · checkuser (log)) has appeared to the article's talk page ([20]). MathXplore (talk) 23:29, 19 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed, plus all other accounts are blocked fr33kman 01:18, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
This section was archived on a request by: Eptalon (talk) 09:16, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Users at R2dra

I'm pretty sure this person is a sock of the sockfarm of R2dra and his previous blocked sock accounts.

I Sock Raged Pratihar/HistorianAlferedo.[21][22]

II Sock Howlings/HistorianAlferedo.[23][24][25][26]

III Sock Howlings/HistorianAlferedo.[27][28]

IV this ip was block as sock of Hashid Khan[2] who is confirmed sock of R2dra[2] ip was also block on simple wikipedia[3].

This section was archived on a request by: Eptalon (talk) 09:16, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

April 20, 2025

This account was registered on the day following the CheckUser block of Tuscan Ant as a sockpuppet of Kk.urban. The account concerned seems to be highly familiar with a series of site operations (e.g. page move, Template creation, script manipulation) ‒ does not look like a new user. Similar to Tuscan Ant, the account concerned also seems to be pretty interested in articles related to U.S. localities. Both accounts show the pattern of performing uninterrupted series of identical operations within a short time, and patrolling random articles to make trivial copyedits. I may be wrong, but the behavioural patterns of the two accounts do come off as pretty similar. Steven1991 (talk) 22:31, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Not confirmed fr33kman 00:05, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
This section was archived on a request by: Eptalon (talk) 09:26, 25 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

22 April 2025

Bensebgli is community banned from English Wikipedia due to his history of socking and caste POV pushing, which seems to be repeating here. After his request for unblock was rejected at WP:AN on en-wiki, he has started editing simple-wiki on 21 March 2025 [31][32]

On 23 March, Durjan Singh Jadon joined the simple Wikipedia and started reverting others on caste pages to restore gujjar clan articles. [33][34][35][36]

Both of these users are working in tandem with one another in order to promote Gujjar caste POV. [37][38][39][40][41][42]

Bensebgli is seemingly aware of previous caste based disruption in the topic as well as English Wikipedia [43] so is Durjan Singh Jadon who is supporting them. [44][45] Koshuri Sultan (talk) 05:24, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This report is entirely misleading also simple-wiki has nothing to do with En-wiki, if a user is constructively trying to contribute. Thanks. Bensebgli (Talk) 07:17, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Koshuri Sultan Keep in mind CU is not going to help because I'm 100% confident and honest that Durjan is a different person also Durjan is not blocked/banned on En-wiki and you need to file a SPI report on En-wiki, if you think he is my sock. Also you should provide solid evidence only about my Simple-wiki's conduct not en wiki.
Note for the admin this user on En-wiki posted a oppose vote in my unblock appeal now he posted this misleading report. I'm honest or not CU will declaire soon.. Bensebgli (Talk) 07:24, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Koshuri Sultan "Both of these users are working in tandem with one another in order to promote Gujjar caste POV." Really? I think you are not aware about Retaliatory SPI reporting? If I'm not wrong first you voted on En-wiki against my unblock appeal even when we had zero interactions before? How you find my unblock appeal there this is very suspecius. In 2025-2024 you were unblocked with some conditions on en-wiki before that you were blocked for sockpuppetry on En-wiki. For the last 22-23 months any filed SPI report didn't prove me commiting any sockpuppetry. Still I'm 1000% confident I have zero connection with any other accounts except with one and the only account (Bensebgli). Also if you're not aware Durjan was accused by a disruptive Editor/related IPs as belonging to another caste/group. At WP:AN this report is filed against another user and admin will respond there if user conducted side-wide editing. [19][20][21][22][23][24] these provided diffs only show I reverted disruptive edits of Blocked IPs those are blocked by MathXplore and these diffs all show I've provided edit summaries for all these edits mostly against (disruptive blocked IPs or a user who is accused for side wide editing) . Bensebgli (Talk) 07:35, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hello all. I ran a check, and I don't see any overlapping IPs. The IPs listed are from different countries. So, they are likely not the same user. And yes, Bensebgli is blocked on EnWP. From CU point of view, no action is required. Eptalon (talk) 07:47, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Eptalon Thank you. I was aware about the result that's why I confidently said I'm (100% confident Durjan is a different person) also I found this report as Retaliatory because same user on en-wiki out of no where casted his oppose vote on my unblock appeal (without any proper objections). Now he filled this report and citing here En-wiki's matters as an evidence? As you said Durjan and I'm from two different countries/locations. I'll repeat again on en-wiki I tried hard to prove that "for the last 22-23 months I didn't commit any sockpuppetry will also not in the future". I'm here on Simple Wikipedia just to start my new journey. Now I'm mature enough to understand that if I will commit mistake of sockpuppetry in future, I'll be blocked globally. Also there is not a point to use the account that is blocked on en-wiki and an alternative account at the same time. Bensebgli (Talk) 08:01, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hello Bensebgli, yes, the statement that I wrote is public, and you can reference it. When you do, it would likely be best to reference a specific version of the page, as these reports get archived periodically. Eptalon (talk) 08:07, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you very much for your quick response and clarifications. Yes I'll reference a specific revision of this report, if I'll need to cite in future. Bensebgli (Talk) 08:23, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
This section was archived on a request by: Eptalon (talk) 09:26, 25 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Users at Tatiane Forte

The 1st user is the 1st author of this page, and it was deleted due to Wikipedia:Requests for deletion/Requests/2025/Tatiane Forte. After the RFD, the 2nd user recreated the page. MathXplore (talk) 13:56, 24 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

It's not a direct match, I'd conclude it as  Possible.-- BRP ever 12:15, 25 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
This section was archived on a request by: BRP ever 12:21, 25 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Users at Hamidreza Elahi (football analyst)

Possible WP:EVASION. The 1st user is the author of the page, and the 2nd user (already blocked) uploaded a related file to Commons (File:حمیدرضا الهی آنالیزور.jpg). MathXplore (talk) 08:36, 25 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Not confirmed. BRP ever 12:21, 25 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
This section was archived on a request by: BRP ever 12:21, 25 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Qewse

Qewse is blocked here. Both of these users are blocked as sockpuppets of the same person on English Wikipedia. TagUser (talk) 22:31, 27 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Add Mobinkhojastehb (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · SUL · CA · checkuser (log)) per overlap at Navid Jamshidi with the 2nd user. MathXplore (talk) 23:54, 27 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Not supported by our data fr33kman 00:31, 28 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
This section was archived on a request by: BRP ever 14:19, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Users at Template:Infobox character1

Possible WP:EVASION. The 1st user made this template, and this was deleted by Fr33kman. The 2nd user has recreated the template. MathXplore (talk) 01:44, 29 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed fr33kman 02:45, 29 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
This section was archived on a request by: BRP ever 14:19, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Users at Alisha Parveen

The 1st user is the author of the page, and the 2nd user is repeating tag removal here (special:diff/10224455, special:diff/10224361) and joined the RFD (special:diff/10224470). MathXplore (talk) 09:42, 29 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed fr33kman 11:10, 29 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
This section was archived on a request by: BRP ever 14:19, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Users at Jajomyje and Talk:Jajomyje

I'm listing up the users around this page. The 1st user is the 1st author of the page, and they are globally blocked by AramilFeraxa. Before and after the global block, more users have appeared at this page ([46], [47], [48], [49]). The page is deleted by Fr33kman & BRPever. Also, the 6th user caused a QD G8 case at the talk page. Some users are also active at plwiki. MathXplore (talk) 12:41, 29 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

All from different ISPs so not confirmed fr33kman 16:48, 29 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
This section was archived on a request by: BRP ever 14:19, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://simple.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_checkuser/Archives/2025-04&oldid=10236827"
Uses material from the Wikipedia article Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Archives/2025-04, released under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license.