Wikipedia:Requests for deletion/Requests/2023/Miracle Nelson

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further changes should be made to this discussion.

The outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. Disregarded blocked user comments fr33k man 19:11, 29 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Miracle Nelson

Miracle Nelson (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Ferien has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Appears to fail WP:GNG --Ferien (talk) 22:50, 18 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Ferien i saw that you requested my article be deleted, while i know its nothing personal you could also have just edited what part of the article was falling short of instead of requesting a deletion Namgung hahyun (talk) 06:56, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Notability is not an issue that can be addressed by editing. --Ferien (talk) 21:17, 20 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This subject of this article is Notable you can take time to search on google and find out your self Jeinijin (talk) 05:02, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

Keep ●The article is well-supported by credible sources, including mentions of awards and recognition received by the organization, further establishing its notability--Namgung hahyun (talk) 05:55, 19 November 2023 (UTC) — This user has made few or no contributions outside of this page.[reply]
Wikipedia is for everyone and making edits before or not doesn't dispute a person choice on a certaIn subject Jeinijin (talk) 05:05, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep ● This article has basic comprehensive english language and the subject is notable and has alot of search coverage on google Deviod —Comment without a date added on 17:08, 20 November 2023‎ (UTC) — This user has made few or no contributions outside of this page.
Keep it provides important and relevant information that is accessible to a wide range of readers with varying levels of English jeinijin —Comment without a date added on 17:30, 20 November 2023‎ (UTC — This user has made few or no contributions outside of this page.
Delete - None of the references, beyond ref 1 (the reliability of which is also questionable as this magazine seems sketchy to me), are either reliable, independent/unbiased or in-depth. Fails GNG.— *Fehufangą ♮ ✉ Talk page 13:18, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - lack of significant coverage aside, there is a case for considering the article to be a BLP1E. Chenzw Talk 14:19, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: I feel like after the RfD is finished, the keep votes should probably be checked by a CU.- FusionSub (Talk page) (Contributions) 11:35, 22 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
For the reference: the keep votes turned out to be likely one user, and have been blocked Eptalon (talk) 21:48, 22 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Ah ok.- FusionSub (Talk page) (Contributions) 09:53, 24 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This request is due to close on 22:50, 25 November 2023 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.