Wikipedia:Requests for deletion/Requests/2025/Chenab Times Foundation

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further changes should be made to this discussion.

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete. During the closing review, I considered the comments that specifically addressed the sources. Of the 3 commenters, 2 indicated that there were multiple citations on multiple sources independent of the subject. However, Ravensfire presented a strong argument that the sources in fact were press releases or otherwise not meeting our sourcing guidelines. After some research, I concur with the assessment that the sources contained in the article do not meet our guidelines for either 1. failing to provide significant coverage of the Chenab Times Foundation or 2. failing to meet our reliability standards. As a result, the article does not meet the notability standards mentioned by the other 2 commenters and qualifies for deletion. --Griff (talk) 02:03, 17 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Chenab Times Foundation (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Kuskrey has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: No Notability Found Other please check if I am not wrong Ksy 16:50, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

• Keep: The article is available for various sister wikipedia. I found that it was created in 2023 on Kashmiri Wikipedia. While multiple citations looks good and reliable which means it is significantly covered and notable.Uniperplex (talk) 03:50, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
•  Delete non-notable, advertising article. BZPN (talk) 09:52, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
•  Keep covered in multiple sources independent of the subject. Seems notable to me and passes RS. fr33kman 01:22, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Weak delete - There's some poor sources in the article - press releases, a couple of the sites feel iffy from reading their "About us" page, and several sources have a byline like "JK Monitor News Network", or no byline at all [1], which is a flag for churnalism or w:WP:NEWSORGINDIA. [2] and [3] feels like solid sources with significant coverage (especially the second), although those are about a news account by Chenab Times, not the Foundation. So not as helpful as at first glance. A couple of other sources likewise focus on Chenab Times news group, with a passing mention, at best, of the Foundation. Overall, I'm not seeing quality sources with significant coverage of the Foundation. I see churnalism and puff pieces, passing mentions or coverage of the Chenai Times news company. Ravensfire (talk) 22:54, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This request is due to close on 16:50, 13 February 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.