Wikipedia:Requests for deletion

Shortcuts
If you think a page should be deleted, read the deletion policy to make sure.
Then follow these instructions on how to request a page for deletion. To find more information on what discussed deletions and quick deletions are:
PLEASE READ THIS

Before nominating: checks and alternatives

Shortcut

Prior to nominating article(s) for deletion, please be sure to:

A. Read and understand these policies and guidelines
  1. The Wikipedia deletion policy, which explains valid grounds for deletion.
  2. The main four guidelines and policies that inform deletion discussions: notability (WP:N), verifiability (WP:V), reliable sources (WP:RS), and what Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)
  3. Subject-specific notability guidelines, which can be found at Category:Wikipedia notability guidelines
B. Carry out these checks
  1. Confirm that the article does not meet the criteria for quick deletion.
  2. If there are verifiability, notability or other sourcing concerns, take reasonable steps to search for reliable sources. (See step D.)
  3. Review the article's history to check for potential vandalism or poor editing.
  4. Read the article's talk page for previous nominations and/or that your objections haven't already been dealt with.
  5. Check "What links here" in the article's sidebar, to see how the page is used and referenced within Wikipedia.
  6. Check if there are interlanguage links, also in the sidebar, which may lead to more developed and better sourced articles. Likewise, search for native-language sources if the subject has a name in a non-Latin alphabet (such as Japanese or Greek), which is often in the lead.
C. Consider whether the article could be improved rather than deleted
  1. If the article can be fixed through normal editing, then it is not a candidate for RfD.
  2. If the article was recently created, please consider allowing the contributors more time to develop the article.
  3. If an article has issues try first raising your concerns on the article's talk page, with the main contributors, and/or adding a cleanup tag, such as {{notability}}, {{hoax}}, {{original research}}, or {{advert}}; this ensures readers are aware of the problem and may act to fix it.
  4. If the topic is not important enough to merit an article on its own, consider merging or redirecting to an existing article. This should be done particularly if the topic name is a likely search term.
D. Search for additional sources, if the main concern is notability
  1. The minimum search expected is a normal Google search, a Google Books search, a Google News search, and a Google News archive search; Google Scholar is suggested for academic subjects.
  2. If you find a lack of sources, you've completed basic due diligence before nominating. However, if a quick search does find sources, this does not always mean an RfD on a sourcing basis is unwarranted. If you spend more time examining the sources, and determine that they are insufficient, e.g., because they only contain passing mention of the topic, then an RfD nomination may still be appropriate.
  3. If you find that adequate sources do appear to exist, the fact that they are not yet present in the article is not a proper basis for a nomination. Instead, you should consider citing the sources, or at minimum apply an appropriate template to the page that flags the sourcing concern. Common templates include {{unreferenced}}, {{refimprove}}, {{third-party}}, {{primary sources}} and {{one source}}.

Discussed deletion

Put the deletion tag on the article.
  1. Click "Change source" at the top of the page to be deleted.
  2. In the edit box, add this tag: {{rfd|REASON}}. Put it at the top of the page, above the rest of the text. Then, replace the text "REASON" with a short reason why the page should be deleted. Do not be too specific here. You can add more details on the discussion page (see below).
    • It is a good idea to write a change summary to let others know what you are doing. You can say "nominating for deletion", "requesting deletion", or something like that.
  3. Click "Save changes" at the bottom to save the page with the deletion tag at the top.
    • You can also check the "Watch this page" check box to add the page to your watchlist. This lets you know if the page for deletion has been changed. If the deletion tag is removed any time before the discussion is closed, it should be put back.
Create a discussion page.
  1. If the deletion tag has been added to the page, a box should appear at the top of the article with a link saying "Click here to create a discussion page!" Click that link.
  2. You should be taken to a page starting with "Creating Wikipedia:Requests for deletion/Requests/..." along with the current year and the name of the article to be deleted. In the edit box, the following tag should have already been added: {{RfD/Preload/Template}} . Replace the text PLACE REASON HERE with a more detailed reason why the page should be deleted.
    • It is helpful to include links to the various policy pages about Wikipedia (that begin with Wikipedia:). Here are some examples of this: "This article is [[Wikipedia:COMPLEX|not easy to understand]]" or "Not a [[Wikipedia:notable|notable]] topic''. This will make others more aware of why the page is not acceptable under Wikipedia's policies.
  3. Click "Save changes" to save the new discussion page when you are done.
    • A change summary you can write for this page is "creating discussion page", "starting deletion discussion", or something like that.
    • As with the page for deletion, you can check the "Watch the page" box. This will let you know if someone else has replied to your discussion.
List it here
  1. Copy the title of the discussion page to the clipboard. You can do this by dragging the mouse over the text from "Wikipedia" to the end of the page title to highlight it, then right-clicking and selecting "Copy".
  2. Go to the list of deletion requests, and click "change source" beside the words "Current deletion request discussions".
  3. At the top of the list of discussions, paste the title from the clipboard (right-click and select "Paste"). Add a pair of curly brackets before and after the title to make a template that will copy the content of the discussion page onto the main deletion page, like this:
    {{Wikipedia:Requests for deletion/Requests/2026/(name of page to be deleted)}}
  4. Finally, click "Save changes" to add the discussion to the list. If the page saves successfully, you should see your deletion discussion at the top of the list. And that's it!

If this is too complicated for you, there are some gadgets like Twinkle that you can use. This allows you to do it faster.

Quick deletion

See also: Wikipedia:Deletion policy § Quick deletion

If you think a page has nonsense content, add {{non}} to the top of the page.

If you think a page does not say why the subject is important, add {{notable}} to the top of the page.

If you think a page should be deleted per other quick deletion rules, add {{QD|reason}} to the top of the page.

Notifying the user

Generally, you should try to be civil and tell the user that created the page to join the discussion talking about the page. This can be done by adding {{subst:RFDNote|page to be deleted}} ~~~~ to the bottom of their talkpage.

Discussions

See also: Wikipedia:Deletion review
  • The discussion is not a vote. Please make suggestions on what action to take, and support your suggestion with reasons.
  • Please look at the article before you make a suggestion. Do not make an opinion using only the information given by the nominator. Looking at the history of the article may help to understand the situation.
  • Please read other comments and suggestions. They may have helpful information.
  • Start your comments or suggestions on a new line. Start with * and sign after your comment by adding ~~~~ to the end. If you are responding to another editor, put your comment directly below theirs and make sure your comment is indented (using more than one *).
  • New users can make suggestions, but their ideas may not be considered, especially if the suggestion seems to be made in bad faith. The opinion of users who had an account before the start of the request may be given more weight or importance.
  • Suggestions by users using "sock puppets" (more than one account belonging to the same person) will not be counted.
  • Please make only one suggestion. If you change your mind, change your first idea instead of adding a new one. The best way to do this is to put <s> before your old idea and </s> after it. For example, if you wanted to delete an article but now think it should be kept, you could put: "Delete keep".
  • If you would like an article to be kept, you can improve the article and try to fix the problems given in the request for deletion. If the reasons given in the nomination are fixed by changing, the nomination can be withdrawn by the nominator, and the deletion discussion will be closed by an administrator.
  • Try to avoid confusing suggestions, such as delete and merge.
  • Requests for deletion is not a war zone. You can click here for more information, although the page is not in Simple English.

Remember: You do not have to make a suggestion for every nomination. You should think about not making a suggestion if:

  1. A nomination involves a topic that you do not know much about.
  2. Everyone has made the same suggestion and you agree with that suggestion.
  • All times are in UTC.

Current deletion request discussions


Quinawazilion

Quinawazilion (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

Spiderone has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fails WP:GNG imho. I couldn't find anything when searching online other than self-published content and a YouTube video uploaded by Project Namkaran itself. The papers linked are by Nawaz Uddin himself and Blogspot is unreliable. This is no more notable than if I made up a number and called it 'Spideronezillion' Spiderone (talk) 13:25, 21 October 2026 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

If you found poorly verifiable sources, then I concur with your nomination for deletion. Perhaps this is even a hoax. Barbara (talk) 18:38, 21 October 2026 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 13:25, 28 October 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Decnawazilion

Decnawazilion (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

Spiderone has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fails WP:GNG potentially. I couldn't find anything when searching online other than self-published content and a YouTube video uploaded by Project Namkaran itself. The papers linked are by Nawaz Uddin himself and Blogspot is unreliable. This is no more notable than if I made up a number and called it 'Spideronezillion' Spiderone (talk) 13:24, 21 October 2026 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

It seems as if the editor may be using an unreliable journal article written by himself as a source. I concur with what the nomination editor has written above. Barbara (talk) 18:43, 21 October 2026 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 13:24, 28 October 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Novanawazilion

Novanawazilion (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

Spiderone has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fails WP:GNG potentially. I couldn't find anything when searching online other than self-published content. The papers linked are by Nawaz Uddin himself and Blogspot is unreliable. Spiderone (talk) 13:19, 21 October 2026 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion


This request is due to close on 13:19, 28 October 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Reichskommissariat

Reichskommissariat (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

Barbara (WVS) has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: I could find no source that described Reichskommissariat as puppets. In addition enWikipedia defines this term quite differently as a 'administrative entity'. Barbara (talk) 21:52, 18 October 2026 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion


This request is due to close on 21:52, 25 October 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Neeru Yadav Hockeywali Sarpanch

Neeru Yadav Hockeywali Sarpanch (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

Ferien has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fails WP:GNG. Quickly deleted about a year ago now but sent to DRV with no opposition to restoration. I still don't think there is enough coverage. --Ferien (talk | join TBA!) 16:35, 18 October 2026 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 16:35, 25 October 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Nawazilion

Nawazilion (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

Spiderone has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: I could only find self-published sources discussing this, I don't believe that 'Project Namkaran' is notable enough. It does not meet WP:GNG. Blogspot is self-published as is the YouTube channel with only one subscriber. Spiderone (talk) 16:21, 18 October 2026 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

  • When searching for the term at Google, the SEWP page is the first hit. Needless to say that's I'd not a good sign as to independent coverage. I therefore propose to delete the page -Eptalon (talk) 17:08, 18 October 2026 (UTC)
  • Delete per nom and Eptalon --NDG (talk) 09:47, 19 October 2026 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 16:21, 25 October 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Parvezilion

Parvezilion (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

Spiderone has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: I could only find self-published sources discussing this. It does not meet WP:GNG. Blogspot is self-published as is the YouTube channel with only one subscriber. Spiderone (talk) 16:18, 18 October 2026 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

  • When I search for the term, the second or third page that comes up, and that looks relevant, is on blogspot. It may well be that people are discussiong such names, but they wlill likely not use blogspot for that. So, riht now, I am leaning towards a delete--Eptalon (talk) 17:49, 18 October 2026 (UTC)
  • Delete per nom and Eptalon --NDG (talk) 09:47, 19 October 2026 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 16:18, 25 October 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Octonawazilion

Octonawazilion (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

Spiderone has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: I could only find self-published sources discussing this. It does not meet WP:GNG. Spiderone (talk) 12:46, 18 October 2026 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

  • Delete per nom, SEWP is the first google hit followed by quora --NDG (talk) 09:48, 19 October 2026 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 12:46, 25 October 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Septenawazilion

Septenawazilion (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

Spiderone has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: The only mention of this number is the Project Namkaran paper submitted by Muhammad Nawaz Uddin, who named the number after himself. I can't find any coverage of this number in reliable sources independent of Nawaz Uddin. Spiderone (talk) 12:41, 18 October 2026 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

  • Delete per nom, SEWP is the first google hit followed by YouTube. --NDG (talk) 09:49, 19 October 2026 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 12:41, 25 October 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Template:2026 elections in Russia

Template:2026 elections in Russia (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

Minorax has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Red-linked template. Unused. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 09:18, 18 October 2026 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

  • Looks like a collection of red-links. Also, given our editor base, I doubt we have a large number of editors who want to populate that. So, if the template is unused, we should delete it--Eptalon (talk) 15:31, 18 October 2026 (UTC)
  • Unpopulated, so delete --NDG (talk) 11:43, 19 October 2026 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 09:18, 25 October 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Template:2025 elections in Russia

Template:2025 elections in Russia (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

Minorax has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Red-linked template. Unused. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 09:18, 18 October 2026 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

  • Looks like a collection of red-links. Also, given our editor base, I doubt we have a large number of Editors who want tl populate that. So, if the template is unused, we should delete it--Eptalon (talk) 15:31, 18 October 2026 (UTC)
  • Unpopulated, so delete --NDG (talk) 11:43, 19 October 2026 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 09:18, 25 October 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Template:2024 elections in Russia

Template:2024 elections in Russia (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

Minorax has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Red-linked template. Unused. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 09:18, 18 October 2026 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

  • Looks like a collection of red-links. Also, given our editor base, I doubt we have a large number of editors who want to populate that. So, if the template is unused, we should delete it--Eptalon (talk) 15:29, 18 October 2026 (UTC)
  • Unpopulated, so delete --NDG (talk) 11:43, 19 October 2026 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 09:18, 25 October 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Template:2023 elections in Russia

Template:2023 elections in Russia (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

Minorax has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Red-linked template. Unused. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 09:18, 18 October 2026 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

  • Unpopulated, so delete --NDG (talk) 11:42, 19 October 2026 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 09:18, 25 October 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Template:2022 elections in Russia

Template:2022 elections in Russia (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

Minorax has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Red-linked template. Unused. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 09:17, 18 October 2026 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

  • Looks like a collection of red-links. Also, given our editor base, I doubt we have a large number of editora who want ot populate that. So, if the template is unused, we shouls likely delete it--Eptalon (talk) 15:30, 18 October 2026 (UTC)
  • Unpopulated, so delete --NDG (talk) 11:42, 19 October 2026 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 09:17, 25 October 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Template:2018 elections in Russia

Template:2018 elections in Russia (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

Minorax has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Red-linked template. Unused. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 09:17, 18 October 2026 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

  • Like the ones above, also up for deletion: mostly a collection of red-links. A navigation template is there to be able to quickly jimp to pages that exist. If like here, most (or all of them) don't exist, there's little point in using a template... delete--Eptalon (talk) 17:52, 18 October 2026 (UTC)
  • Unpopulated, so delete --NDG (talk) 11:41, 19 October 2026 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 09:17, 25 October 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Template:2017 elections in Russia

Template:2017 elections in Russia (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

Minorax has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Red-linked template. Unused. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 09:17, 18 October 2026 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

  • Looks like a collection of red-links. Also, given our editor base, I doubt we have a large number of editora who want ot populate that. So, if the template is unused, we shouls likely delete it--Eptalon (talk) 15:31, 18 October 2026 (UTC)
  • Unpopulated, so delete --NDG (talk) 11:41, 19 October 2026 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 09:17, 25 October 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Secondary antisemitism

Secondary antisemitism (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

Eptalon has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Hello, I think we should delte this page, it has been marked as 'may contain original research'; it was also stared by one editor, wo is now banned form changing wikipedia. Personally, I see that the page has several issues, and after cleanup, only very little of the 'concept' may be left. What do other people think? Eptalon (talk) 08:39, 17 October 2026 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion


This request is due to close on 08:39, 24 October 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Silk: Threats & Menaces

Silk: Threats & Menaces (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

Eptalon has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Contested quick deletion, so taking it to RfD. What we do have is an article with like two sections, which is likely not in Simple English (debatable). Originally marked as AI generated, and then contested. So, let's do a regiular RfD. In addition, I am also not sure this passes notability; note we do have an article on the main character. Comments? Eptalon (talk) 07:23, 17 October 2026 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

  • @Eptalon: Okay, I have shortened the article to just one section, but I don’t think having more than one section is disallowed. I’ve seen many many articles around here that have more than one section. I’d say it passes notability as much as any book about a character can pass notability: it has enough spread-out reviews, and reports on the delayed release over the pandemic. And I’m fairly certain it is in Simple English (like the most complicated words are "ultimately" and "withheld", and those really aren’t that complicated of words), and without any AI text. So, Keep. ~2026-55907-35 (talk) 20:20, 17 October 2026 (UTC)
    Hello, note that this is not about the article having one secriuon or more, there is no rules about how long the article can/should be. What I noticed was that the article may not be in simple english, but that also is pretty easy to fix. Eptalon (talk) 20:31, 17 October 2026 (UTC)
    That’s fine then. Have I fixed the article to be fully in Simple English then with the most-recent edit? Or is there another specific edit you would recommend making, to make that easy fix, so that the nomination can then be withdrawn? ~2026-55907-35 (talk) 21:06, 17 October 2026 (UTC)
    I have fixed what looks like a run-on sentence. As to the closing: this will likely be done by another admin.. Eptalon (talk) 21:17, 17 October 2026 (UTC)
    Okay, that’s good to hear: so we’re otherwise agreed that the article is otherwise fine now then, with both of our edits? ~2026-55907-35 (talk) 22:09, 17 October 2026 (UTC)
  • ~2026-55907-35, currently the article is far from in Simple English. In fact, it could be eligible for A3 because it is currently a direct copy of en:Special:Diff/1317912290 without simplification or attribution. en:Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/TotalTruthTeller24/Archive will also be of interest here. I make no formal vote right now as I do not have the time to properly look into the notability of this, but all I will say is you can already go down at least two different routes of quick deletion for this article. --Ferien (talk | join TBA!) 12:50, 18 October 2026 (UTC)
  • Okay, Redirect per A3. I did not know that. Portabellow (talk) 13:43, 18 October 2026 (UTC)
Since it is at RfD, we will likely no longer quick delete. When the time had come, an admin (other then me) will close this, as s regular request. Eptalon (talk) 09:26, 20 October 2026 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 07:23, 24 October 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Arakan Coast Guard

Arakan Coast Guard (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

Ferien has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Apparently part of the Arakan Army but don't appear to be notable. --Ferien (talk | join TBA!) 21:04, 14 October 2026 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

  • No interwikis so doesn't seem to be notable anywhere else. Delete --NDG (talk) 18:26, 19 October 2026 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 21:04, 21 October 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Paul Vaughn

Paul Vaughn (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

CountryANDWestern has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: No notability shown. He appeared in ten episodes of a show that ran for 275; he’s not named for serveral of them. The sources are a couple of sentences in a gossip column and his name listed in the show’s credits. No major performances othwewise. CountryANDWestern (talk) 09:12, 9 October 2026 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

  • Keep. Found many sources about him in Newspapers.com, and also it's confirmed that he's also known as Paul Fithian through the sources. Here: , , , , , , , , . MoviesandTelevisionFan (talk) 15:54, 9 October 2026 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 09:12, 16 October 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Recently closed deletion discussions

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further changes should be made to this discussion.

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete. As this RfD did not receive any comments, this counts as a "soft delete". --Ferien (talk | join TBA!) 12:42, 18 October 2026 (UTC)

Billy & Mandy: Wrath of the Spider Queen

Billy & Mandy: Wrath of the Spider Queen (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

Davey2010 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Non notable movie, Fails NMOVIE and GNG, Over at Enwiki en:Billy & Mandy: Wrath of the Spider Queen redirects to en:The Grim Adventures of Billy & Mandy, Thanks –Davey2010Talk 10:37, 11 October 2026 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion


This request is due to close on 10:37, 18 October 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further changes should be made to this discussion.

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete. As this RfD did not receive any comments, this counts as a "soft delete". --Ferien (talk | join TBA!) 12:39, 18 October 2026 (UTC)

Template:Freenutkas

Template:Freenutkas (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

Minorax has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Unused template with non-existent main article. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 07:59, 11 October 2026 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion


This request is due to close on 07:59, 18 October 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further changes should be made to this discussion.

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete. --Eptalon (talk) 10:20, 17 October 2026 (UTC)

Prince Al-Nabhan

Prince Al-Nabhan (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

ViscountDagon has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: This article purports the existence of a European-style "Prince of al-Nabhan" title of nobility, mixed with small snippets of authentic information about the real Nabhani dynasty of Oman (Wikipedia:Do not create hoaxes). However, this claim isn't sourced and originates from a Brazilian national who's been attempting to attain recognition as a "Prince" by asserting a connection to this medieval dynasty because his Levantine grandfather's surname was "Nabhan", which is just a common Arabic name. there exists no independent information on such a Brazilian or Levantine offshoot of the dynasty, and it has never been something of note before being asserted by this person earlier this year (Wikipedia:Notability). The creation of a wiki page about him was previously attempted without success, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Pietro_Bryan_Nabhan_Dias, and multiple wiki pages about the dynasty were vandalised, with no sources attached, to include his claims, a summary of those claims could be found on some online encyclopedias like Miraheze's Royalpedia and Fandom's British Royal Family Wiki & Monarchies Wiki, however, they were all blanked yesterday coinciding with when I began cleaning up the Wiki articles that were affected by the hoax. This article is where it's stated the main claim is "his own discovery", https://midiamax.com.br/midiamais/2026/principe-sul-mato-grossense-descobre-ligacao-familiar-antiga-dinastia-arabe/ ViscountDagon (talk) 12:53, 10 October 2026 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion


This request is due to close on 12:53, 17 October 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further changes should be made to this discussion.

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete. Based on the results below, I deleted the page. I also did this because there would have been a big effort involved in making the page adhere to an NPOV-standard. Note also, that I started the page Antijudaism. I think it is a lot more neutral, and can be used as a new starting point.--Eptalon (talk) 07:54, 17 October 2026 (UTC)

Anti-Judaism and antisemitism

Anti-Judaism and antisemitism (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

Ferien has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: This article is honestly quite a mess. Firstly, it is a piece by blocked user Steven1991. As always from them, it is extremely complex and unsuitable for this Wikipedia. It tries to combine anti-Judaism and antisemitism, and these are quite distinct things - I will let the enwiki article explain it (from w:en:Anti-Judaism, see that article's history for attribution) "Although these designations share a commonality—hatred towards a group of people—each term encompasses unique ideologies and prejudices. [...] Anti-Judaism encapsulates those who oppose the Jewish religion and religious system. [...] Antisemites hate and target Jews for their ethnic Jewish identity rather than religious beliefs." We already have the article antisemitism, that this article mostly covers. An article directly addressing Anti-Judaism would be more preferable, but it is clear this cannot be a base for it. --Ferien (talk | join TBA!) 09:27, 9 October 2026 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

  • Note that this is not directed at the user who created the article. Honestly I think that the two concepts are different, and even though this is simple English, both can be explained in articles of their own; note: we likely need to adapt the category tree as well (always provided we get the required three items for a category, bit that's a different story). In short: delete this article-Eptalon (talk) 19:23, 12 October 2026 (UTC)
    If the page is deleted, and later s page on anti-judaism is recreated care should be taken to not mix categories (and to not add an anti-semitism related category Eptalon (talk) 20:19, 13 October 2026 (UTC)
  • Note the creator of this page has now been banned by the WMF. --Ferien (talk | join TBA!) 22:15, 13 October 2026 (UTC)
  • Delete per nom --NDG (talk) 08:16, 15 October 2026 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 09:27, 16 October 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further changes should be made to this discussion.

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete. Ternera (talk) 21:31, 15 October 2026 (UTC)

The Open Press (newspaper)

The Open Press (newspaper) (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

Ferien has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fails WP:GNG. Also see w:en:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Open Press. --Ferien (talk | join TBA!) 10:31, 8 October 2026 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

  •  Delete None of the sources in the article go beyond routine coverage. No good sources elsewhere.— *Fehufangą ♮ ✉ Talk page 23:02, 9 October 2026 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 10:31, 15 October 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.