Hubble Space Telescope image of 2004 XR190, taken in October 2010 | |
| Discovery | |
|---|---|
| Discovered by | CFEPS |
| Discovery site | Maunakea Obs. |
| Discovery date | 11 December 2004 |
| Designations | |
| "Buffy" (nickname) | |
| Orbital characteristics(barycentric) | |
| Epoch 2025 Ṃay 05 (JD 2460800.5) | |
| Uncertainty parameter 2 | |
| Observation arc | 20.00 yr (8,036 d) |
| Earliest precovery date | 6 December 2002 |
| Aphelion | 63.794 AU |
| Perihelion | 51.134 AU |
| 57.464 AU | |
| Eccentricity | 0.1102 |
| 435.6 yr (160,600 d) | |
| 277.234° | |
| 0° 0m 8.064s / day | |
| Inclination | 46.7276° |
| 252.387° | |
| 26 May 2114 ±5 days | |
| 283.849° | |
| Known satellites | 0 |
| Physical characteristics | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
(612911) 2004 XR190, internally nicknamed Buffy by the discovery team, is a trans-Neptunian object, classified as both a scattered disc object and a detached object, located in the outermost region of the Solar System. It was first observed on 11 December 2004, by astronomers with the Canada–France Ecliptic Plane Survey at the Mauna Kea Observatories, Hawaii, United States.
2004 XR190 is one of the largest known highly inclined (> 45°) objects. With a perihelion of 51 AU, it belongs to a small and poorly understood group of very distant objects with moderate eccentricities.
2004 XR190 was discovered on 11 December 2004. It was discovered by astronomers led by (Rhiannon) Lynne Allen of the University of British Columbia as part of the Canada–France Ecliptic Plane Survey (CFEPS) using the Canada–France–Hawaii Telescope (CFHT) near the ecliptic. The team included Brett Gladman, John Kavelaars, Jean-Marc Petit, Joel Parker and Phil Nicholson. In 2015, six precovery images from 2002 and 2003 were found in Sloan Digital Sky Survey data.
This section needs expansion. You can help by adding missing information. (October 2026) |
On 22 January 2021, an occultation by 2004 XR190 occurred.
The object was informally nicknamed "Buffy" by the discovery team, after the fictional vampire slayer Buffy Summers, and the team proposed several Inuit-based official names to the International Astronomical Union in 2005. The provisional designation of 2004 XR190 indicates its discovery date, the first letter represents the first half of December and the second letter and the numbers after it mean that it is the 4793rd object discovered during that half-month.

2004 XR190 orbits the Sun at a distance of 51.1–63.8 AU once every 435 years and 7 months (159,111 days; semi-major axis of 57.46 AU). Its orbit has a moderate eccentricity of 0.11 and a high inclination of 47° with respect to the ecliptic. It came to aphelion around 1901.
It belongs to the same group as (690420) 2014 FC72, 2014 FZ71, 2015 FJ345 and 2015 KQ174 (also see diagram), that are poorly understood for their large perihelia combined with moderate eccentricities. Considered a scattered and detached object, 2004 XR190 is particularly unusual as it has an unusually circular orbit for a scattered-disc object (SDO). Although it is thought that traditional scattered-disc objects have been ejected into their current orbits by gravitational interactions with Neptune, the low eccentricity of its orbit and the distance of its perihelion (SDOs generally have highly eccentric orbits and perihelia less than 38 AU) seems hard to reconcile with such celestial mechanics. This has led to some uncertainty as to the current theoretical understanding of the outer Solar System. The theories include close stellar passages, unseen planet/rogue planets/planetary embryos in the early Kuiper belt, and resonance interaction with an outward-migrating Neptune. The Kozai mechanism is capable of transferring orbital eccentricity to a higher inclination.
A conference abstract by Jones and others in 2006 shows that 2004 XR190 is not in a 8:3 mean motion resonance with Neptune.
The object is one of the largest objects with an inclination larger than 45°, traveling further "up and down" than "left to right" around the Sun when viewed edge-on along the ecliptic.
Older estimates used assumed albedos between 0.04 and 0.25, and absolute magnitudes from 4.3 to 4.6, 2004 XR190 had an estimated diameter of 335 to 850 kilometers; the mean arrived at by considering the two single-figure estimates plus the centre points of the three ranges is 562 km, approximately a quarter the diameter of Pluto. Johnston's archive estimates a diameter of 502 kilometers. However, a thesis by Flavia Luane Rommel, shows a stellar occultation observed by Westport Green Gao Westport in the USA and another one in Sant Esteve Sesrovires in Catalonia, Spain, which shows that it has longest dimension of 716 ± 132 kilometres (445 ± 82 mi), and an equivalent diameter of 600 ± 170 kilometres (370 ± 110 mi), with a oblateness of 0.32±0.14. Another website named "euraster.ericfrappa.com" yielded a diameter of at least 560 kilometres (350 mi) of the same occultation.
This article may require cleanup to meet Wikipedia's quality standards. The specific problem is: WP:NOTSTATS, excessive amount of data. (October 2026) |
A study by Hainaut et al. shows that 2004 XR190 has color indices of: B-V of 0.790; V-R of 0.450; R-I of 0.520; and V-I of 0.970. with V-J, J-H and H-K having no known value. Another study by Peixinho et al. shows that 2004 XR190 has B-R of 1.240±0.040. An older study shows that it has color indices of: B-R of 1.24±0.04; V-R of 0.45±0.04; R-I of 0.52±0.04; and B-I of 1.76±0.04. Johnston's archive uses also a B-R of 1.24, and shows it is a BR object. A conference abstract by Jones and others in 2006 shows that it has color indices of: g'-r' of 0.55±0.04 and 0.30±0.04, making it in the "neutral or gray range of TNOs". 2004 XR190 has no known surface voaltiles. Johnston's archive also assumes an albedo of 0.130. A thesis by Flavia Luane Rommel, derives an albedo of 0.095±0.23, using the occultation model in the same thesis.
A thesis by Flavia Luane Rommel, shows that there are many possibilities of the rotation period of 2004 XR190, with 19.47 hours (0.811 d) being the most likely rotation period, with only one peak. But there is also 10.57 hours (0.440 d) for the second peak, and 7.26 hours (0.303 d) for the third peak, although there still needs to be more observations to get an accurate value.
In the same thesis, they detect a lightcurve amplitude of 0.16 to 0.20 magnitudes, where 0.20 magnitudes is from the 19.47 hour rotation period, 0.17 for the 10.57 hour rotation period, and 0.16 for the 7.26 rotation period.