Access journalism

Access journalism, or access reporting, refers to journalism (often in interview form) which prioritizes access—meaning media time with important, rich, famous, powerful, or otherwise influential people in politics, culture, sports, business, technology, and other areas—over journalistic objectivity and/or integrity.[page needed]

Journalist Tom Foremski notes that access plays a role in journalism due to reporters relying on the access to influential people, such as CEOs, to keep their jobs. Though this does not always translate to more factual reporting, some companies may exploit the journalists' need for access, or encourage a level of friendliness between media and executive.

Features

Typical features of access journalism include:

Access journalism, in some cases, is similar to infomercials, or advertising disguised as news. The venture of doing the interview can be symbiotic—beneficial for both the journalist and the celebrity, since it can synergically bring more attention to both of them, and further notability, influence, media exposure, current relevance, etc., for both of them.

Access journalism has been contrasted with accountability journalism. A similar contrast is between lapdog journalism and watchdog journalism.

See also

References

  1. ↑ "Relevance and Challenges of the Agenda-Setting Theory in the Changed Media Landscape" (PDF). American Communication Journal. Retrieved 2024-08-13.
  2. 1 2 3 "'Access journalism' ... and the Silicon Valley reporter". ZDNET. Retrieved 2026-03-29.
  3. ↑ Manning, Peter (2018-12-20). "How 'access journalism' is threatening investigative journalism". The Conversation. Retrieved 2025-08-08.
  4. ↑ "What Americans know, and don't, about how journalism works". American Press Institute. Retrieved 2024-08-13.
  5. ↑ "Access Journalism vs Accountability Journalism". Stereophile. 15 April 2015.
  6. ↑ "Watchdogs or Lapdogs? What State Ads Are Subtracting from Critical Journalism". Open Society Foundations. Retrieved 2024-08-13.