Ball-pen probe used on tokamak CASTOR in 2004. A stainless steel collector moves inside a ceramic (boron nitride) shielding tube.Schematic picture of a single ball-pen probe. Ions (in red) have a large gyromagnetic radius and can reach the collector more easily than electrons (in blue).
A ball-pen probe is a modified Langmuir probe used to measure the plasma potential in magnetized plasmas. The ball-pen probe balances the electron and ion saturation currents, so that its floating potential is equal to the plasma potential. Because electrons have a much smaller gyroradius than ions, a moving ceramic shield can be used to screen off an adjustable part of the electron current from the probe collector.
If a Langmuir probe (electrode) is inserted into a plasma, its potential is not equal to the plasma potential because a Debye sheath forms, but instead to a floating potential . The difference with the plasma potential is given by the electron temperature:
where the coefficient is given by the ratio of the electron and ion saturation currents ( and ) expressed by electron and ion current density ( and ) and proportional collecting areas ( and ):
The ball-pen probe modifies the collecting areas for electrons and ions in such a way that the ratio is equal to one. Consequently, and the floating potential of the ball-pen probe becomes equal to the plasma potential regardless of the electron temperature:
Design and calibration
Potential and ln(R) of the ball-pen probe for different positions of the collector
When the collector slides within the shield, the ratio varies, and can be set to 1. The adequate retraction length strongly depends on the magnetic field's value. The collector retraction should be roughly below the ion's Larmor radius.[citation needed] Calibrating the proper position of the collector can be done in two different ways:
The ball-pen probe collector is biased by a low-frequency voltage that provides the I-V characteristics and obtain the saturation current of electrons and ions. The collector is then retracted until the I-V characteristics becomes symmetric. In this case, the ratio is close to unity, though not exactly. If the probe is retracted deeper, the I-V characteristics remain symmetric.
The ball-pen probe collector potential is left floating, and the collector is retracted until its potential saturates. The resulting potential is above the Langmuir probe potential.[clarification needed]
Electron temperature measurements
Using two measurements of the plasma potential with probes whose coefficient differ, it is possible to retrieve the electron temperature passively (without any input voltage or current). Using a Langmuir probe (with a non-negligible) and a ball-point probe (whose associated is close to zero) the electron temperature is given by:
where is measured by the ball-pen probe, by the standard Langmuir probe, and is given by the Langmuir probe geometry, plasma gas composition, the magnetic field, and other minor factors (secondary electron emission, sheath expansion, etc.). It can be calculated theoretically, its value being about 3 for a non-magnetized hydrogen plasma.
In practice, the ratio for the ball-pen probe is not exactly equal to one, so that the coefficient must be corrected by an empirical value for :
where
Ion temperature measurements
Example of the electron branch of the ball-pen probe I-V characteristic with fast sweeping frequency f = 50 kHz as measured on the tokamak COMPASS using data acquisition system with 5 MHz sampling frequency
The ion temperature is an important quantity in fusion plasmas; however, it is only rarely measured using electrical probes. The ball-pen probe can be used to determine this quantity by fitting its current–voltage characteristics. The method is relatively simple, but requires a source of sweeping voltage. The ion temperature is obtained from the exponential part of the electron branch () of the current–voltage characteristic, as described below:
where denotes the ion saturation current (), and the coefficient represents a generally observed linear increase with electron current ( for fully saturated case), combined with an exponential dependence describing the ion current, which is governed by the ion temperature .
The main advantages of this method include:
Robust and local measurements, making it suitable for both small and large fusion devices (COMPASS, Wendelstein 7-X)
A relatively high level of the effective probe signal (), which enables the use of a fast voltage sweeping regime and allows high temporal resolution (on the order of ).
References
123Adámek, J.; J. Stöckel; M. Hron; J. Ryszawy; M. Tichý; R. Schrittwieser; C. Ionită; P. Balan; E. Martines; G. Van Oost (2004). "A novel approach to direct measurement of the plasma potential". Czechoslovak Journal of Physics. 54 (3): 95–99. Bibcode:2004CzJPS..54C..95A. doi:10.1007/BF03166386. ISSN1572-9486. S2CID54869196.
12Adámek, J.; J. Stöckel; I. Ďuran; M. Hron; R. Pánek; M. Tichý; R. Schrittwieser; C. Ionit; P. Balan; E. Martines; G. Oost (2005). "Comparative measurements of the plasma potential with the ball-pen and emissive probes on the CASTOR tokamak". Czechoslovak Journal of Physics. 55 (3): 235–242. Bibcode:2005CzJPh..55..235A. doi:10.1007/s10582-005-0036-8. ISSN0011-4626. S2CID54002051.
12Adamek, J.; J. Horacek; J. Seidl; H.W. Müller; R. Schrittwieser; F. Mehlmann; P. Vondracek; S. Ptak (2014). "Direct Plasma Potential Measurements by Ball-Pen Probe and Self-Emitting Langmuir Probe on COMPASS and ASDEX Upgrade". Contributions to Plasma Physics. 54 (4): 279–284. Bibcode:2014CoPP...54..279A. doi:10.1002/ctpp.201410072. S2CID117937384.
123Adamek, J.; H.W. Müller; C. Silva; R. Schrittwieser; C. Ionita; F. Mehlmann; S. Costea; J. Horacek; B. Kurzan; P. Bilkova; P. Böhm; M. Aftanas; P. Vondracek; J. Stöckel; R. Panek; H. Fernandes; H. Figueiredo (2016). "Profile measurements of the electron temperature on the ASDEX Upgrade, COMPASS, and ISTTOK tokamak using Thomson scattering, triple, and ball-pen probes". Review of Scientific Instruments. 87 (4): 043510. Bibcode:2016RScI...87d3510A. doi:10.1063/1.4945797. PMID27131677.
123Adamek, Jiri; Matej Peterka; Tomaz Gyergyek; Pavel Kudrna; Mirko Ramisch; Ulrich Stroth; Jordan Cavalier; Milan Tichy (2013). "Application of the ball-pen probe in two low-temperature magnetised plasma devices and in torsatron TJ-K". Contributions to Plasma Physics. 53 (1): 39–44. Bibcode:2013CoPP...53...39A. doi:10.1002/ctpp.201310007. S2CID120969312.
↑Lafouti, M.; M. Mahjour (2026). "Experimental Study of Blob Dynamics and Turbulence Spreading in the Sol of IR-T1 Tokamak by Mix-probe". Instrum Exp Tech. 69: 66–72. doi:10.1134/S002044122670003X.
↑J. Cerovsky, M. Farnik, M. Sos, J. Svoboda, O. Ficker, M. Hetflejs, P. Svihra, M. Shkut, O. Grover, J. Veverka, V. Svoboda, J. Stockel, J. Adamek, M. Dimitrova, "Tokamak GOLEM for fusion education", 44th EPS Conference on Plasma Physic, 26–30 June 2017, Belfast, Northern Ireland (UK), P1.107,
↑Zanaska, Michal; J. Adamek; M. Peterka; P. Kudrna; M. Tichy (2015). "Comparative measurements of plasma potential with ball-pen and Langmuir probe in low-temperature magnetized plasma". Physics of Plasmas. 22 (3): 033516. Bibcode:2015PhPl...22c3516Z. doi:10.1063/1.4916572.
↑Stangeby P.C.: The Plasma Boundary of Magnetic Fusion Devices, Institute of Physics Publishing. Bristol and Philadelphia (2000).
↑Hutchinson I.H.: Principles of Plasma Diagnostics, Cambridge University Press (1992).
12Adamek, J.; D. Cipciar; A. Devitre; J. Horacek; J. Cavalier; M. Komm; J. Krbec; M. Tichy; D. Trunec; P. Böhm; R. Panek (2021). "Ion temperature measurements in the tokamak scrape-off layer with high temporal resolution". Nuclear Fusion. 61: 036023. doi:10.1088/1741-4326/abd41d.