Boosting (behavioral science)

Boosting is a behavioral science technique that aims to improve a person's ability to initiate and control their actions, and ability to make informed decisions. It is an intervention or strategy designed to enhance individuals' decision-making capabilities, cognitive skills, or behaviors by improving their competences.

Training in the ability to interpret statistical information, particularly Bayesian reasoning, as well as training the basic accounting heuristics and procedural routines. AI-powered boosting refers to the use of artificial intelligence tools and systems for boosting. Unlike manual boosting, which relies on human-delivered interventions, AI-powered boosting leverages automation of providing decision aids that guide humans to attend to the important information and integrate it according to a rational decision strategy.

Comparison with nudging

Like nudging, boosting is a public policy based on behavioral science. Yet, not all public policy based on behavioral science evidence can be equated with nudging. Nudging works by shaping the external context to guide behavior, whereas boosting focuses on building internal capacities to enable better decision-making. Both approaches have their strengths and can be complementary.

In contrast to nudging, boosting is based on the premise that people can find their way around complex environments and make largely rational decisions despite their limited cognitive capacities. This can also be described as ecological rationality.

References

  1. ↑ Herzog, Stefan M.; Hertwig, Ralph (17 January 2025). "Boosting: Empowering Citizens with Behavioral Science". Annual Review of Psychology. 76 (1): 851–881. doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-020924-124753. hdl:21.11116/0000-000F-D158-2. ISSN 0066-4308. PMID 39413154.
  2. ↑ Sedlmeier, P.; Gigerenzer, G. (September 2001). "Teaching Bayesian reasoning in less than two hours". Journal of Experimental Psychology. General. 130 (3): 380–400. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.130.3.380. hdl:11858/00-001M-0000-0025-9504-E. ISSN 0096-3445. PMID 11561916.
  3. ↑ Drexler, Alejandro; Fischer, Greg; Schoar, Antoinette (1 April 2014). "Keeping It Simple: Financial Literacy and Rules of Thumb". American Economic Journal: Applied Economics. 6 (2): 1–31. doi:10.1257/app.6.2.1.
  4. ↑ Marti, Deniz; Budathoki, Anjila; Ding, Yi; Lucas, Gale; Nelson, David (2024). "How Does Acknowledging Users' Preferences Impact AI's Ability to Make Conflicting Recommendations?". International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction. 0: 1–12. doi:10.1080/10447318.2024.2426035. ISSN 1044-7318.
  5. ↑ Becker, Frederic; Skirzyński, Julian; van Opheusden, Bas; Lieder, Falk (1 December 2022). "Boosting Human Decision-making with AI-Generated Decision Aids". Computational Brain & Behavior. 5 (4): 467–490. arXiv:2203.02776. doi:10.1007/s42113-022-00149-y. ISSN 2522-087X.
  6. 1 2 Hertwig, Ralph; Grüne-Yanoff, Till (1 November 2017). "Nudging and Boosting: Steering or Empowering Good Decisions". Perspectives on Psychological Science. 12 (6): 973–986. doi:10.1177/1745691617702496. hdl:11858/00-001M-0000-002E-8D6F-D. ISSN 1745-6916. PMID 28792862. Archived from the original on 19 October 2023. Retrieved 31 January 2025.
  7. ↑ Hertwig, Ralph; Grüne-Yanoff, Till (1 November 2017). "Nudging and Boosting: Steering or Empowering Good Decisions". Perspectives on Psychological Science. 12 (6): 973–986. doi:10.1177/1745691617702496. hdl:11858/00-001M-0000-002E-8D6F-D. ISSN 1745-6916. PMID 28792862.