Larger domains
One way of defining the exponential function over the complex numbers is to first define it for the domain of real numbers using one of the above characterizations, and then extend it as an analytic function, which is characterized by its values on any infinite domain set.
Also, characterisations (1), (2), and (4) for
apply directly for
a complex number. Definition (3) presents a problem because there are non-equivalent paths along which one could integrate; but the equation of (3) should hold for any such path modulo
. As for definition (5), the additive property together with the complex derivative
are sufficient to guarantee
. However, the initial value condition
together with the other regularity conditions are not sufficient. For example, for real x and y, the function
satisfies the three listed regularity conditions in (5) but is not equal to
. A sufficient condition is that
and that
is a conformal map at some point; or else the two initial values
and
together with the other regularity conditions.
One may also define the exponential on other domains, such as matrices and other algebras. Definitions (1), (2), and (4) all make sense for arbitrary Banach algebras.
Equivalence of the characterizations
The following arguments demonstrate the equivalence of the above characterizations for the exponential function.
Characterization 1 ⇔ characterization 2
The following argument is adapted from Rudin, theorem 3.31, p. 63–65.
Let
be a fixed non-negative real number. Define

By the binomial theorem,
(using x ≥ 0 to obtain the final inequality) so that:
One must use lim sup because it is not known if tn converges.
For the other inequality, by the above expression for tn, if 2 ≤ m ≤ n, we have:

Fix m, and let n approach infinity. Then
(again, one must use lim inf because it is not known if tn converges). Now, take the above inequality, let m approach infinity, and put it together with the other inequality to obtain:
so that

This equivalence can be extended to the negative real numbers by noting
and taking the limit as n goes to infinity.
Characterization 1 ⇔ characterization 3
Here, the natural logarithm function is defined in terms of a definite integral as above. By the first part of fundamental theorem of calculus,

Besides, 
Now, let x be any fixed real number, and let

Now, ln(y) = x, which implies that y = ex, where ex is in the sense of definition 3. We have

Here, the continuity of ln(y) is used, which follows from the continuity of 1/t:

Here, the result ln an = n ln a has been used. This result can be established for n a natural number by induction, or using integration by substitution. (The extension to real powers must wait until ln and exp have been established as inverses of each other, so that ab can be defined for real b as eb ln a.)

Characterization 1 ⇔ characterization 4
Let
denote the solution to the initial value problem
. Applying the simplest form of Euler's method with increment
and sample points
gives the recursive formula:
This recursion is immediately solved to give the approximate value
, and since Euler's Method is known to converge to the exact solution, we have: 
Characterization 2 ⇔ characterization 4
Let n be a non-negative integer. In the sense of definition 4 and by induction,
.
Therefore 
Using Taylor series,
This shows that definition 4 implies definition 2.
In the sense of definition 2,
![{\displaystyle {\begin{aligned}{\frac {d}{dx}}e^{x}&={\frac {d}{dx}}\left(1+\sum _{n=1}^{\infty }{\frac {x^{n}}{n!}}\right)=\sum _{n=1}^{\infty }{\frac {nx^{n-1}}{n!}}=\sum _{n=1}^{\infty }{\frac {x^{n-1}}{(n-1)!}}\\[6pt]&=\sum _{k=0}^{\infty }{\frac {x^{k}}{k!}},{\text{ where }}k=n-1\\[6pt]&=e^{x}\end{aligned}}}](https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/media/math/render/svg/86128e9f129e565851026aed221433047fea96c7)
Besides,
This shows that definition 2 implies definition 4.
Characterization 2 ⇒ characterization 5
In the sense of definition 2, the equation
follows from the term-by-term manipulation of power series justified by uniform convergence, and the resulting equality of coefficients is just the Binomial theorem. Furthermore:

Characterization 3 ⇔ characterization 4
Characterisation 3 first defines the natural logarithm:
then
as the inverse function with
. Then by the Chain rule:
i.e.
. Finally,
, so
. That is,
is the unique solution of the initial value problem
,
of characterization 4.
Conversely, assume
has
and
, and define
as its inverse function with
and
. Then:
i.e.
. By the Fundamental theorem of calculus,
Characterization 5 ⇒ characterization 4
The conditions f'(0) = 1 and f(x + y) = f(x) f(y) imply both conditions in characterization 4. Indeed, one gets the initial condition f(0) = 1 by dividing both sides of the equation
by f(0), and the condition that f′(x) = f(x) follows from the condition that f′(0) = 1 and the definition of the derivative as follows:
![{\displaystyle {\begin{array}{rlll}f'(x)&=\lim \limits _{h\to 0}{\frac {f(x+h)-f(x)}{h}}&=\lim \limits _{h\to 0}{\frac {f(x)f(h)-f(x)}{h}}&=\lim \limits _{h\to 0}f(x){\frac {f(h)-1}{h}}\\[1em]&=f(x)\lim \limits _{h\to 0}{\frac {f(h)-1}{h}}&=f(x)\lim \limits _{h\to 0}{\frac {f(0+h)-f(0)}{h}}&=f(x)f'(0)=f(x).\end{array}}}](https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/media/math/render/svg/67da9bab9f8679ba6953a4ba21fc413b4949fbd0)
Characterization 5 ⇒ characterization 4
Assume characterization 5, the multiplicative property together with the initial condition
imply that: 
Characterization 5 ⇒ characterization 6
Let
be a Lebesgue-integrable non-zero function satisfying the mulitiplicative property
with
. Following Hewitt and Stromberg, exercise 18.46, we will prove that Lebesgue-integrability implies continuity. This is sufficient to imply
according to characterization 6, arguing as above.
First, a few elementary properties:
- If
is nonzero anywhere (say at
), then it is non-zero everywhere. Proof:
implies
.
. Proof:
and
is non-zero.
. Proof:
.
- If
is continuous anywhere (say at
), then it is continuous everywhere. Proof:
as
by continuity at
.
The second and third properties mean that it is sufficient to prove
for positive x.
Since
is a Lebesgue-integrable function, then we may define
. It then follows that

Since
is nonzero, some y can be chosen such that
and solve for
in the above expression. Therefore:
![{\displaystyle {\begin{aligned}f(x+\delta )-f(x)&={\frac {[g(x+\delta +y)-g(x+\delta )]-[g(x+y)-g(x)]}{g(y)}}\\&={\frac {[g(x+y+\delta )-g(x+y)]-[g(x+\delta )-g(x)]}{g(y)}}\\&={\frac {f(x+y)g(\delta )-f(x)g(\delta )}{g(y)}}=g(\delta ){\frac {f(x+y)-f(x)}{g(y)}}.\end{aligned}}}](https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/media/math/render/svg/7eea315ee000792fba974ea99f60bd33bba121f0)
The final expression must go to zero as
since
and
is continuous. It follows that
is continuous.