Concept class

In computational learning theory in mathematics, a concept over a domain X is a total Boolean function over X. A concept class is a class of concepts. Concept classes are a subject of computational learning theory.

Concept class terminology frequently appears in model theory associated with probably approximately correct (PAC) learning. In this setting, if one takes a set Y as a set of (classifier output) labels, and X is a set of examples, the map c:X→Y, i.e. from examples to classifier labels (where Y={0,1} and where c is a subset of X), c is then said to be a concept. A concept class C is then a collection of such concepts.

Given a class of concepts C, a subclass D is reachable if there exists a sample s such that D contains exactly those concepts in C that are extensions to s. Not every subclass is reachable.[why?]

Background

A sample s is a partial function from X[clarification needed] to {0,1}. Identifying a concept with its characteristic function mapping X to {0,1}, it is a special case of a sample.

Two samples are consistent if they agree on the intersection of their domains. A sample s′ extends another sample s if the two are consistent and the domain of s is contained in the domain of s′.

Examples

Suppose that C=S+(X). Then:

Applications

Let C be some concept class. For any concept c∈C, we call this concept 1/d-good for a positive integer d if, for all x∈X, at least 1/d of the concepts in C agree with c on the classification of x. The fingerprint dimension FD(C) of the entire concept class C is the least positive integer d such that every reachable subclass C′⊆C contains a concept that is 1/d-good for it. This quantity can be used to bound the minimum number of equivalence queries[clarification needed] needed to learn a class of concepts according to the following inequality:FD(C)−1≤#EQ(C)≤⌈FD(C)ln⁡(|C|)⌉.

References

  1. ↑ Chase, H., & Freitag, J. (2018). Model Theory and Machine Learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:1801.06566.
  2. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Angluin, D. (2004). "Queries revisited" (PDF). Theoretical Computer Science. 313 (2): 188–191. doi:10.1016/j.tcs.2003.11.004.