The first definition presented here is typically used in Analysis (harmonic analysis, Fourier Analysis, and integration theory in general) to analysis properties of functions.
Definition 1: Suppose is a measure space, and let be a real-valued measurable function. The distribution function associated with is the function given byIt is convenient also to define .
The function provides information about the size of a measurable function .
Definition 2. Let be a finite measure on the space of real numbers, equipped with the Borel -algebra. The distribution function associated to is the function defined by
It is well known result in measure theory that if is a nondecreasing right continuous function, then the function defined on the collection of finite intervals of the form by
extends uniquely to a measure on a -algebra that included the Borel sets. Furthermore, if two such functions and induce the same measure, i.e. , then is constant. Conversely, if is a measure on Borel subsets of the real line that is finite on compact sets, then the function defined by
is a nondecreasing right-continuous function with such that .
This particular distribution function is well defined whether is finite or infinite; for this reason, a few authors also refer to as a distribution function of the measure . That is:
Definition 3: Given the measure space , if is finite on compact sets, then the nondecreasing right-continuous function with such that is called the canonical distribution function associated to .
Example
As the measure, choose the Lebesgue measure. Then by Definition of
Therefore, the distribution function of the Lebesgue measure is
for all .
Comments
The distribution function of a real-valued measurable function on a measure space is a monotone nonincreasing function, and it is supported on . If for some , then
When the underlying measure on is finite, the distribution function in Definition 3 differs slightly from the standard definition of the distribution function (in the sense of probability theory) as given by Definition 2 in that for the former, while for the latter,
When the objects of interest are measures in , Definition 3 is more useful for infinite measures. This is the case because for all , which renders the notion in Definition 2 useless.
References
↑Rudin, Walter (1987). Real and Complex Analysis. NY: McGraw-Hill. p.172.
↑Folland, Gerald B. (1999). Real Analysis: Modern Techniques and Their Applications. NY: Wiley Interscience Series, Wiley & Sons. pp.33–35.