This article may require copy editing for spelling, grammar, style, cohesion, or tone. (November 2025) |

Dynamic positioning (DP) is a computer-controlled system which automatically maintains a vessel's position and heading by using its own propellers and thrusters. Position references sensors, combined with wind sensors, motion sensors, and gyrocompasses, provides the computer with information about the vessel's position and the magnitude and direction of the environmental forces affecting it. Examples of vessel types that employ DP include ships and semi-submersible mobile offshore drilling units (MODU), oceanographic research vessels, cable layer ships, and cruise ships.
The computer program contains a mathematical model of the vessel, including information such as its current drag and thrusters' locations. This knowledge, combined with sensor data (e.g. wind), allows the computer to calculate the required steering angle and the output for each thruster to support operations at sea where mooring or anchoring is not feasible due to deep water, seabed congestion (pipelines, templates), or other constraints.
Dynamic positioning may be either absolute, in that the position is locked to a fixed point on the bottom, or relative to a moving object, such as another ship or an underwater vehicle. One may also position the ship at a favourable angle to the wind, waves, and current, a practice called Weathervaning.
Dynamic positioning is used by much of the offshore oil industry, for example, in the North Sea, Persian Gulf, Gulf of Mexico, West Africa, and off the coast of Brazil.
Dynamic positioning began in the 1960s for offshore drilling. With drilling moving into ever deeper waters, jack-up barges could not be used anymore, and anchoring in deep water was not economical.
As part of Project Mohole, in 1961, the drillship CUSS 1 was fitted with four steerable propellers. The Mohole project aimed to drill to the Moho, which required a solution for deep-water drilling. It was possible to keep the ship in position above a well off La Jolla, California, at a depth of 948 meters.
After this, off the coast of Guadalupe, Mexico, five holes were drilled, the deepest at 183 m (600 ft) below the sea floor in 3,500 m (11,500 ft) of water, while maintaining a position within a radius of 180 metres (590 ft). The ship's position was determined by radar ranging to buoys and sonar ranging from subsea beacons.
Whereas the CUSS 1 was kept in position manually, Shell later in the same year launched the drilling ship Eureka, which had an analog control system interfaced with a taut wire, making it the first true DP ship.
While the first DP ships had analog controllers and lacked redundancy, vast improvements have been made since then. DP is now used not only in the oil industry but also on various other types of ships. In addition, DP is no longer limited to maintaining a fixed position. One use case is sailing an exact track, which is useful for cablelay, pipelay, survey, and other tasks.
Other methods of position-keeping include using an anchor spread and a jack-up barge. All have their own advantages and disadvantages.
| Jack-up barge | Anchoring | Dynamic positioning | |
| Advantages |
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Disadvantages |
|
|
|
Although all methods have their own advantages, dynamic positioning has enabled many operations that were previously infeasible.
The costs are falling due to newer, cheaper technologies, and the advantages are becoming more compelling as offshore work moves into ever-deeper water and the underwater environment (coral) is given greater respect. In container operations, crowded ports can be made more efficient through faster, more accurate berthing techniques. Cruise ship operations benefit from faster berthing and non-anchored "moorings" off beaches or inaccessible ports.

Important applications include:
A ship's motion can be described in terms of six degrees of freedom, consisting of translation and rotation along three perpendicular axes.
The three translational motions are:
The three rotational motions are:
Dynamic positioning is primarily concerned with controlling a vessel in the horizontal plane, namely translation along the two horizontal axes (surge and sway) and rotation about the vertical axis (yaw).
For a vessel to operate using dynamic positioning (DP), several essential components are required:
When designing a DP vessel, careful consideration must be given to both the position reference systems and the available thrust. In particular, maintaining position and heading in adverse weather requires sufficient thrust capacity in all three controlled degrees of freedom: surge, sway, and yaw.
Maintaining a fixed position is especially challenging in polar conditions, where ice forces can change rapidly. Current ship-borne ice detection and mitigation technologies are not yet advanced enough to predict these forces reliably, though they may offer advantages over sensors deployed by helicopter.
There are several methods for determining a ship's position at sea. Most traditional methods of ship navigation are not accurate enough to meet some modern requirements. For that reason, several positioning systems have been developed during the past decades. Producers of DP systems are: Marine Technologies LLC, Kongsberg Maritime, Navis Engineering Oy, GE, SIREHNA, Wärtsilä (ex L-3), Edison Chouest Offshore, Rolls-Royce plc, Praxis Automation Technology, Brunvoll AS. The term digital anchor has been used to describe such dynamic positioning systems. The applications and availability depends on the type of work and water depth. The most common position reference systems (PRS) and position measuring systems (PME) are:

More advanced methods are:
Besides position and heading, other variables are fed into the DP system through sensors:

In the beginning, PID controllers were used and are still used in simpler DP systems today. But modern controllers use a mathematical model of the ship that is based on a hydrodynamic and aerodynamic description concerning some of the ship's characteristics, such as mass and drag. Of course, this model is not entirely correct. The ship's position and heading are fed into the system and compared with the model's prediction. This difference is used to update the model by using the Kalman filtering technique. For this reason, the model also has input from the wind sensors and feedback from the thrusters. This method even allows not having input from any PRS for some time, depending on the quality of the model and the weather. This process is known as dead reckoning.
The accuracy and precision of the different PRSs is not the same. While a DGPS has a high accuracy and precision, a USBL can have a much lower precision. For this reason, the PRS's are weighted. Based on variance, a PRS receives a weight between 0 and 1.

To maintain position azimuth thrusters (electric, L-drive or Z-drive) bow thrusters, stern thrusters, water jets, rudders, and propellers are used. DP ships are usually at least partially diesel-electric, as this allows a more flexible setup and better handles the large changes in power demand typical of DP operations. These fluctuations may be suitable for hybrid operation. An LNG-powered platform supply vessel started operation in 2016 with a 653 kWh/1600 kW battery acting as spinning reserve during DP2, saving 15-30% fuel. The 154-meter North Sea Giant has combined 3 powerpacks, switchboards and 3×0.67 MWh (2 MWh) batteries to operate in DP3-redundancy using only one engine, keeping the engine load between 60% and 80%.
The setup depends on the ship's DP class. A Class 1 can be relatively simple, whereas the system of a Class 3 ship is quite complex. On Class 2 and 3 ships, all computers and reference systems should be powered through an UPS.
Based on IMO (International Maritime Organization) publication 64,5 the Classification Societies have issued rules for Dynamic Positioned Ships described as Class 1, Class 2, and Class 3.
Classification Societies have their own Class notations:
| Description | IMO Equipment Class | LR Equipment Class | DNV Equipment Class | GL Equipment Class | ABS Equipment Class | NK Equipment Class | BV Equipment Class |
| Manual position control and automatic heading control under specified maximum environmental conditions. | - | DP(CM) | DYNPOS-AUTS | - | DPS-0 | - | |
| Automatic and manual position and heading control under specified maximum environmental conditions. | Class 1 | DP(AM) | DYNPOS-AUT & DPS1 | DP 1 | DPS-1 | DPS A | DYNAPOS AM/AT |
| Automatic and manual position and heading control under specified maximum environmental conditions, during and following any single fault, excluding loss of a compartment. (Two independent computer systems). | Class 2 | DP(AA) | DYNPOS-AUTR & DPS2 | DP 2 | DPS-2 | DPS B | DYNAPOS AM/AT R |
| Automatic and manual position and heading control under specified maximum environmental conditions, during and following any single fault, including loss of a compartment due to fire or flood. (At least two independent computer systems with a separate backup system separated by an A60 class division). | Class 3 | DP(AAA) | DYNPOS-AUTRO & DPS3 | DP 3 | DPS-3 | DPS C | DYNAPOS AM/AT RS |
DNV rules 2011, Pt 6, Ch 7, introduced the "DPS" classification series to compete with ABS's "DPS" series.
Where IMO leaves the decision of which class applies to what kind of operation to the operator of the DP ship and its client, the Norwegian Maritime Authority (NMA) has specified what Class should be used regarding the risk of an operation. In the NMA Guidelines and Notes No. 28, enclosure A, four classes are defined:
Based on this, the type of ship is specified for each operation:
Loss of position, also known as runoff, can threaten safe operations and the environment, including possible loss of life, injury, damage to property or the environment, and loss of reputation and time. Incident records indicate that even vessels with redundant dynamic positioning systems experience occasional loss of position, which may result from human error, procedural failures, dynamic positioning system failures, or poor design.
This section needs expansion. You can help by adding missing information. (November 2018) |
Dynamic positioning failure results in an inability to maintain position or heading control and can cause a drift-off due to insufficient thrust or a drive-off due to inappropriate thrust.
The basic response with a closed bell is similar to that with a wet bell, but after stowing the umbilicals, the hatch will be sealed to retain internal pressure. The bell will be recovered as rapidly as possible in a red alert, and may be recovered if there is doubt that a yellow alert will be downgraded.
Redundancy is the ability to withstand, while in DP mode, the loss of equipment that is online, without losing position or heading. A single failure can be, amongst others:
For certain operations, redundancy is not required. For instance, if a survey ship loses its DP capability, there is normally no risk of damage or injury. These operations will normally be done in Class 1.
For other operations, such as diving and heavy lifting, there is a risk of damage or injury. Depending on the risk, the operation is done in Class 2 or 3. This means at least three Position reference systems should be selected. This allows the voting logic to be applied, enabling the failing PRS to be found. For this reason, there are also three DP control computers, three gyrocompasses, three MRU's, and three wind sensors on Class 3 ships. If a single fault occurs that jeopardizes the redundancy, i.e., the failure of a thruster, generator, or PRS, and this cannot be resolved immediately, the operation should be abandoned as quickly as possible.
To have sufficient redundancy, enough generators and thrusters should be online so that the failure of one does not result in a loss of position. This is left to the judgment of the DP operator. For Classes 2 and 3, a Consequence Analysis should be incorporated into the system to assist the DPO in this process.
The redundancy of a DP ship should be judged by a failure mode and effects analysis (FMEA) study and proved by FMEA trials. Besides that, annual trials are done. Normally, DP function tests are completed before each project.
The DP operator (DPO) assesses whether sufficient redundancy is available at any given moment during the operation. IMO issued MSC/Circ.738 (Guidelines for dynamic positioning system (DP) operator training) on 24-06-1996. This refers to IMCA (International Marine Contractors Association) M 117 as an acceptable standard.
To qualify as a DP operator, the following path should be followed:
When the watchkeeping is done on a Class 1 DP ship, a limited certificate will be issued; otherwise, a full certificate will be issued.
The DP training and certification scheme is operated by The Nautical Institute (NI). The NI issues logbooks to trainees, accredits training centers, and controls certification issuance.
With ever more DP ships and rising workforce demands, the DPO role is gaining prominence. This shifting landscape led to the creation of The International Dynamic Positioning Operators Association (IDPOA) in 2009.
IDPOA membership comprises certified DPOs who qualify for fellowship (fDPO), while members (mDPO) are those with DP experience or who may already be working within the DP certification scheme.
The International Marine Contractors Association was formed in April 1995 from the amalgamation of the Dynamic Positioning Vessel Owners Association, founded in 1990, and the International Association of Offshore Diving Contractors, founded in 1972.
While it started with the collection and analysis of DP Incidents, since then, it has produced publications on different subjects to improve standards for DP systems. It also works with IMO and other regulatory bodies.
The Marine Technology Society Dynamic Positioning (DP) Committee's mission is to facilitate incident-free DP operations. This committee of volunteers contributes to the DP community of vessel owners, operators, Marine Class Societies, engineers, and regulators through an annual DP Conference, topical workshops, and an extensive set of Guidance Documents covering DP Design Philosophy, DP Operations, and Professional Development of DP Personnel. In addition, a growing set of unique documents, collectively called TECHOP, addresses specific topics of significant interest and impact. Conference papers are available for public download, providing a source of DP industry technical papers.
The DP Guidance documents published by the MTS DP Committee are designed to share knowledge, methods, and unique tools to help the DP community achieve incident-free DP operations.