Edge-localized mode

This article's lead section may be too technical for most readers to understand. Please help improve it to make it understandable to non-experts. (December 2025) (Learn how and when to remove this message)

An edge-localized mode (ELM) is a plasma instability occurring in the edge region of a tokamak plasma due to periodic relaxations of the edge transport barrier in high-confinement mode. Each ELM burst is associated with expulsion of particles and energy from the confined plasma into the scrape-off layer. This phenomenon was first observed in the ASDEX tokamak in 1981. Diamagnetic effects in the model equations expand the size of the parameter space in which solutions of repeated sawteeth can be recovered compared to a resistive MHD model. An ELM can expel up to 20 percent of the reactor's energy.

Issues

ELM is a major challenge in magnetic fusion research with tokamaks, as these instabilities can:

• Damage wall components (in particular divertor plates) by ablating them away due to their extremely high energy transfer rate (GW/m²);
• Potentially couple or trigger other instabilities, such as the resistive wall mode (RWM) or the neoclassical tearing mode (NTM).

Prevention and control

A variety of experiments/simulations have attempted to mitigate damage from ELM. Techniques include:

• Application of resonant magnetic perturbations (RMPs) with in-vessel current carrying coils can eliminate or weaken ELMs.
• Injecting pellets to increase the frequency and thereby decrease the severity of ELM bursts (ASDEX Upgrade).^{[citation needed]}
• Multiple small-scale ELMs (000s/s) in tokamaks to prevent the creation of large ones, spreading the associated heat over a larger area and interval
• Increase the plasma density and, at high densities, adjusting the topology of the magnetic field lines confining the plasma.

History

In 2003 DIII-D began experimenting with resonant magnetic perturbations to control ELMs.

In 2006 an initiative (Project Aster) was started to simulate a full ELM cycle including its onset, the highly non-linear phase, and its decay. However, this did not constitute a "true" ELM cycle, since a true ELM cycle would require modeling the slow growth after the crash, in order to produce a second ELM.

As of late 2011, several research facilities had demonstrated active control or suppression of ELMs in tokamak plasmas. For example, the KSTAR tokamak used specific asymmetric three-dimensional magnetic field configurations to achieve this goal.

In 2015, results of the first simulation to demonstrate repeated ELM cycling was published.

In 2022, researchers began testing the small ELM hypothesis at JET to assess the utility of the technique.

See also

• Resonant magnetic perturbations – Non-axisymmetric magnetic fields used to control tokamak edge instabilities, used to control ELMs
• Plasma instability – Degree to which disturbing a plasma system at equilibrium will destabilize itPages displaying short descriptions of redirect targets
• Tokamak – Magnetic confinement device used to produce thermonuclear fusion power

References

Further reading

• Kirk, A; Liu, Yueqiang; Chapman, I T; Harrison, J; Nardon, E; Scannell, R; Thornton, A J (2013-03-06). "Effect of resonant magnetic perturbations on ELMs in connected double null plasmas in MAST". Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion. 55 (4) 045007. arXiv:1303.0146. Bibcode:2013PPCF...55d5007K. doi:10.1088/0741-3335/55/4/045007. ISSN 0741-3335. S2CID 119208710.
• Tala, Tuomas; Garbet, Xavier (2006). "Physics of Internal Transport Barriers" (PDF). Comptes Rendus Physique. 7 (6): 622–633. Bibcode:2006CRPhy...7..622T. doi:10.1016/j.crhy.2006.06.005 – via Elsevier Science Direct.