The first filter-feeding mechanism proposed was sieving, by Joshua Alder and Albany Hancock in 1851. The sieve theory implies that only particles as big as the mesh of the sieve can be trapped. In 1905, Hans T. S. Wallengren proposed an alternative theory, that sticky limbs of the filters of animals such as mussels could collide with and trap particles smaller than the mesh size. In 1968, the New Zealand marine zoologist John S. Bullivant classified suspension feeders in more detail according to their specific methods of feeding, including 'impingement feeding', 'ciliary feeding', 'filter feeding' using mucus, and 'collision feeding'.
Feeding mechanism
Filter feeding solves the problem of obtaining food from a very dilute suspension in water. It requires in principle a system (such as a muscular pump) that creates a flow of water over a filter (such as gills), and a transport mechanism (such as gill rakers or cilia) to bring food from the filter to the mouth.
Filter feeding is a feeding mechanism used by aquatic animals to gather particles of food from the water around them, by having the water pass over or through a specialized filter that traps solids. An essential component of a filter feeding mechanism is a pump to force a flow of water over the filter. Among benthic invertebrates, some use cilia to create the flow, while others use muscles. Filter-feeders using cilia include tunicates, sponges, bivalves, bryozoans, and some polychaetes. Other polychaetes use muscular mechanisms. Filter feeders can be sessile or mobile, depending on the species and the niches they have evolved to occupy.
The challenge that filter-feeding solves is that food particles are at extremely low density in water, so any animal feeding on suspended particles has to extract the food from a large volume of water. If the feeding system consists of pumping water through a filter, both the pump and the filter need to be efficient. The Bernouilli equation can be used to model the relationship between the pressure, the kinetic energy, and the potential energy. In still water, the kinetic energy of the incoming water is zero, unless the animal has for example a siphon facing into a water current. The flow through a system of tubes such as a filter is reduced by the kinematic viscosity (resistance to flow) of the tubes (described by their low Reynolds number). The kinematic viscosity increases sharply (with the cube of the diameter) as the tubes become narrower, meaning that the finer the filter, the more energy is needed to drive water through it. Among filter-feeding forage fishes such as the herring and pilchard, the flow is created by swimming with the mouth open, resulting in ram feeding, with no buccal pumping by the mouthparts.
Suspension feeders use a wide variety of organs to filter their food out of the water. In 1928, C. M. Yonge listed six types of filter feeding organ:
Types of filter feeding organ identified by C. M. Yonge
Animal secretes strings of mucus; food particles collide with these.
Ecological effects
Filter feeders can play an important role in removing excess nutrients (such as nitrogen and phosphate) from water bodies, and are therefore considered water-cleaning ecosystem engineers. In addition, they help to stabilise ecosystems, and help to make habitats heterogeneous. They are important in bioaccumulation and as such can serve as indicator organisms.
Taxonomic range
Filter feeding is found in multiple groups of animals, many of them marine. It has evolved repeatedly by convergent evolution.
↑Wallengren, Hans Thure Sigurd (1905). "Zur Biologie der Muscheln. I. Die Wasserströmungen" [On the Biology of Mussels. I. The water currents]. Acta Univ. Landwirtschaft (in German). 1: 1–64.
↑Foster-Smith, R. L. (1976). "Pressures generated by the pumping mechanism of some ciliary filter-feeders". Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology. 25 (2): 199–206. Bibcode:1976JEMBE..25..199F. doi:10.1016/0022-0981(76)90020-4.
↑Ortiz-Moriano, Marta Pilar; Garcia-Vazquez, Eva; Machado-Schiaffino, Gonzalo (2025). "Genes of filter-feeding species as a potential toolkit for monitoring microplastic impacts". Aquatic Toxicology. 279 107234. Bibcode:2025AqTox.27907234O. doi:10.1016/j.aquatox.2024.107234. PMID39787666.
↑Werth, Alexander J.; Marshall, Christopher D. (2023). "Convergent evolution of secondarily aquatic feeding in mammals". Convergent Evolution: Animal Form and Function. Springer International Publishing. pp.183–220.
↑Hickman, Cleveland P.; Roberts, Larry S.; Larson, Allan (2001). Integrated principles of zoology (11thed.). McGraw-Hill. p.247. ISBN978-0-07-118077-1.
↑Hinde, Rosalind T. (1998). "The Cnidaria and Ctenophora". In Anderson, D. T. (ed.). Invertebrate Zoology. Oxford University Press. pp.28–57. ISBN978-0-19-551368-4.
↑Gotch, A. F. (1995) [1979]. "Albatrosses, Fulmars, Shearwaters, and Petrels". Latin Names Explained A Guide to the Scientific Classifications of Reptiles, Birds & Mammals. New York, NY: Facts on File. pp. 191–192. ISBN 0-8160-3377-3.
↑Doherty, P. J. (2001). "The Lophophorates". In Anderson, D. T. (ed.). Invertebrate Zoology (2nded.). Oxford University Press. pp.363–373. ISBN978-0-19-551368-4.
Doherty, P. J. (2001). "The Lophophorates". In Anderson, D. T. (ed.). Invertebrate Zoology (2nded.). Oxford University Press. pp.356–363. ISBN978-0-19-551368-4.
Ruppert, E. E.; Fox, R. S.; Barnes, R. D. (2004). Invertebrate zoology: a functional evolutionary approach. Belmont CA: Thomas-Brooks/Cole. ISBN978-0-03-025982-1. OCLC475257771.