| Part of a series on |
| Accounting |
|---|
Financial statement analysis (or just financial analysis) is the process of reviewing and analyzing a company's financial statements to make better economic decisions to earn income in future. These statements include the income statement, balance sheet, statement of cash flows, notes to accounts and a statement of changes in equity (if applicable). Financial statement analysis is a method or process involving specific techniques for evaluating risks, performance, valuation, financial health, and future prospects of an organization.
It is used by a variety of stakeholders, such as credit and equity investors, the government, the public, and decision-makers within the organization. These stakeholders have different interests and apply a variety of different techniques to meet their needs. For example, equity investors are interested in the long-term earnings power of the organization and perhaps the sustainability and growth of dividend payments. Creditors want to ensure the interest and principal is paid on the organizations debt securities (e.g., bonds) when due.
Common methods of financial statement analysis include horizontal and vertical analysis and the use of financial ratios. Historical information combined with a series of assumptions and adjustments to the financial information may be used to project future performance. The Chartered Financial Analyst designation is available for professional financial analysts.
Benjamin Graham and David Dodd first published their influential book "Security Analysis" in 1934. A central premise of their book is that the market's pricing mechanism for financial securities such as stocks and bonds is based upon faulty and irrational analytical processes performed by many market participants. This results in the market price of a security only occasionally coinciding with the intrinsic value around which the price tends to fluctuate. Investor Warren Buffett is a well-known supporter of Graham and Dodd's philosophy.
The Graham and Dodd approach is referred to as Fundamental analysis and includes: 1) Economic analysis; 2) Industry analysis; and 3) Company analysis. The latter is the primary realm of financial statement analysis. On the basis of these three analyses the intrinsic value of the security is determined.
Horizontal analysis compares financial information over time, typically from past quarters or years. Horizontal analysis is performed by comparing financial data from a past statement, such as the income statement. When comparing this past information one will want to look for variations such as higher or lower earnings.
Vertical analysis is a percentage analysis of financial statements. Each line item listed in the financial statement is listed as the percentage of another line item. For example, on an income statement each line item will be listed as a percentage of gross sales. This technique is also referred to as normalization or common-sizing.
Balance sheet analysis examines the composition of a company's assets, liabilities and equity to assess its financial position and financial condition. The balance sheet provides information about how an entity uses its capital (assets) and how those assets are financed through liabilities and equity. This information can be used to assess profitability, capital structure, liquidity, solvency and financial flexibility.
Several financial measures can be derived from balance sheet information and related financial statements:
These dimensions are interrelated. For example, a company's capital structure influences its financial risk, while its liquidity and cash flow generation affect its ability to service debt. Financial statement analysis therefore considers balance sheet information together with information from the income statement and statement of cash flows.
A balance sheet presents an entity's assets, liabilities and equity at a specific reporting date. Assets represent the resources controlled by the entity, while equity and liabilities show how those resources are financed.
Under International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS), balance sheet items include:
The recognition, measurement and presentation of these items are addressed by different IFRS Accounting Standards. For example, IAS 16 addresses property, plant and equipment, IAS 38 intangible assets, IAS 2 inventories, IAS 40 investment property and IFRS 9 financial instruments. IAS 1 historically provided the general requirements for the presentation of financial statements. IFRS 18 replaces IAS 1 for annual reporting periods beginning on or after 1 January 2027, subject to permitted early application.
Under IAS 1, assets and liabilities are generally classified as current or non-current in the statement of financial position. This distinction provides information about an entity's operating cycle, liquidity and financial position.
An asset is classified as current if it meets at least one of the following criteria:
Assets that do not meet these criteria are classified as non-current.
A liability is classified as current if:
Liabilities that do not meet these criteria are classified as non-current.
IAS 1 permits an alternative presentation in which assets and liabilities are presented broadly in order of liquidity rather than divided into current and non-current categories, when this provides information that is reliable and more relevant. This approach is particularly relevant for financial institutions, which may not have a clearly identifiable operating cycle.
The presentation of additional line items depends on the nature and liquidity of assets, the function of assets within the entity, and the amounts, nature and timing of liabilities. The standard therefore allows judgement in determining the most useful structure for presenting financial information.
The structure of a balance sheet provides information about several aspects of an entity's financial position. Its classification of assets, equity and liabilities allows analysts to examine the composition of an entity's resources and the sources of its financing.
These areas of analysis are interrelated. For example, the financing of non-current assets affects the assessment of capital structure and long-term financial stability, while the maturity of liabilities influences liquidity analysis.
Although the balance sheet provides important information about an entity's financial position, it does not necessarily represent the full economic value of a business.
One limitation is that internally generated intangible resources, such as employee expertise, organisational capabilities and certain forms of intellectual capital, are generally not recognised as assets unless the applicable recognition criteria are met. Consequently, the carrying amounts of recognised assets may not reflect all the resources that contribute to a company's economic value.
Historical cost measurement can also limit the usefulness and comparability of balance sheet information. Assets recorded at their original acquisition or production costs may differ substantially from their current market values or replacement costs. Changes in general price levels can further reduce the comparability of amounts reported at different dates.
Furthermore, the balance sheet generally presents individual assets and liabilities separately and does not fully capture the economic benefits arising from synergies between different resources. As a result, the reported net assets of an entity may differ from its overall economic or market value.
The use of fair value measurement under certain IFRS requirements, including IFRS 9 and IFRS 13, provides alternative measurement bases for particular assets and liabilities. However, fair value measurement does not eliminate all limitations associated with financial statement information.
The analysis of an income statement examines an entity's financial performance over a reporting period. It provides information about the income and expenses generated during the period and helps users assess the entity's profitability and its ability to generate sustainable earnings. It also provides information about how management has used the resources entrusted to it.
An important objective of income statement analysis is to distinguish between the results generated by an entity's ordinary business activities and other income and expense items. This distinction can help analysts assess the sustainability of earnings and develop forecasts of future financial performance.
Under IAS 1, an entity presents all income and expenses recognised in a reporting period either in a single statement of profit or loss and other comprehensive income or in two separate statements: a statement of profit or loss and a statement presenting other comprehensive income. The statement of comprehensive income includes changes in equity during the period other than those arising from transactions with owners in their capacity as owners.
Profit or loss includes income and expenses recognised in determining the entity's result for the period. Other comprehensive income (OCI) comprises income and expense items that other IFRS Accounting Standards require or permit to be recognised outside profit or loss. These items are classified according to whether they may subsequently be reclassified to profit or loss.
IFRS Accounting Standards do not prescribe one rigid format for the statement of profit or loss. Instead, IAS 1 requires certain minimum line items and permits entities to present additional items, headings and subtotals when these are relevant to understanding their financial performance.
Expenses may be analysed either by their nature or by their function:
An entity must select the method that provides information that is reliable and more relevant. If expenses are presented by function, additional information about their nature is required in the notes, including depreciation and employee benefits expense.
IAS 1 also requires the separate presentation of certain items, including finance costs, the share of profit or loss of associates and joint ventures accounted for using the equity method, income tax expense and a single amount relating to discontinued operations. Additional line items must be presented when their size, nature or function is relevant to understanding the entity's financial performance.
IAS 1 distinguishes between two methods of analysing expenses in the statement of profit or loss: classification by nature and classification by function. An entity selects the method that provides information that is reliable and more relevant to users of its financial statements.
The two methods provide different perspectives on an entity's financial performance. Classification by nature highlights the types of resources consumed, whereas classification by function provides information about the activities to which those resources relate. The choice of presentation depends on the nature of the entity, its industry and which method provides more relevant and reliable information to users.
Financial ratios are very powerful tools to perform some quick analysis of financial statements. There are four main categories of ratios: liquidity ratios, profitability ratios, activity ratios and leverage ratios. These are typically analyzed over time and across competitors in an industry.
DuPont analysis uses several financial ratios that multiplied together equal return on equity, a measure of how much income the firm earns divided by the amount of funds invested (equity).
A Dividend discount model (DDM) may also be used to value a company's stock price based on the theory that its stock is worth the sum of all of its future dividend payments, discounted back to their present value. In other words, it is used to value stocks based on the net present value of the future dividends.
Financial statement analyses are typically performed in spreadsheet software — or specialized accounting software — and summarized in a variety of formats.
An earnings recast is the act of amending and re-releasing a previously released earnings statement, with specified intent.
Investors need to understand the ability of the company to generate profit. This, together with its rate of profit growth, relative to the amount of capital deployed and various other financial ratios, forms an important part of their analysis of the value of the company. Analysts may modify ("recast") the financial statements by adjusting the underlying assumptions to aid in this computation. For example, operating leases (treated like a rental transaction) may be recast as capital leases (indicating ownership), adding assets and liabilities to the balance sheet. This affects the financial statement ratios.
Recasting is also known as normalizing accounts.
Financial analysts typically have finance and accounting education at the undergraduate or graduate level. Persons may earn the Chartered Financial Analyst (CFA) designation through a series of challenging examinations. Upon completion of the three-part exam, CFAs are considered experts in areas like fundamentals of investing, the valuation of assets, portfolio management, and wealth planning.
In November 2023, research conducted by Patronus AI, an artificial intelligence startup company, compared performance of GPT-4, GPT-4-Turbo, Claude 2, and LLaMA-2 on two versions of a 150-question test about information in financial statements (e.g., Form 10-K, Form 10-Q, Form 8-K, earnings reports, earnings call transcripts) submitted by public companies to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. One version of the test required the generative AI models to use a retrieval system to find the specific SEC filing to answer the questions; the other gave the models the specific SEC filing to answer the question (i.e., in a long context window). On the retrieval system version, GPT-4-Turbo and LLaMA-2 both failed to produce correct answers to 81% of the questions, while on the long context window version, GPT-4-Turbo and Claude-2 failed to produce correct answers to 21% and 24% of the questions, respectively.