Griffiths inequality

In statistical mechanics, the Griffiths inequality, sometimes also called Griffiths–Kelly–Sherman inequality or GKS inequality, named after Robert B. Griffiths, is a correlation inequality for ferromagnetic spin systems. Informally, it says that in ferromagnetic spin systems, if the 'a-priori distribution' of the spin is invariant under spin flipping, the correlation of any monomial of the spins is non-negative; and the two point correlation of two monomial of the spins is non-negative.

The inequality was proved by Griffiths for Ising ferromagnets with two-body interactions, then generalised by Kelly and Sherman to interactions involving an arbitrary number of spins, and then by Griffiths to systems with arbitrary spins. A more general formulation was given by Ginibre, and is now called the Ginibre inequality.

Definitions

Let σ={σj}j∈Λ be a configuration of (continuous or discrete) spins on a lattice Λ. If A⊂Λ is a list of lattice sites, possibly with duplicates, let σA=∏j∈Aσj be the product of the spins in A.

Assign an a-priori measure dμ(σ) on the spins; let H be an energy functional of the form

H(σ)=−∑AJAσA ,

where the sum is over lists of sites A, and let

Z=∫dμ(σ)e−H(σ)

be the partition function. As usual,

⟨f⟩=1Z∫dμ(σ)f(σ)e−H(σ)

stands for the ensemble average.

The system is called ferromagnetic if, for any list of sites A, JA≥0. The system is called invariant under spin flipping if, for any j in Λ, the measure μ is preserved under the sign flipping map σ→τ, where

τk={σk,k≠j,−σk,k=j.

Statement of inequalities

First Griffiths inequality

In a ferromagnetic spin system which is invariant under spin flipping,

⟨σA⟩≥0

for any list of spins A.

Second Griffiths inequality

In a ferromagnetic spin system which is invariant under spin flipping,

⟨σAσB⟩≥⟨σA⟩⟨σB⟩

for any lists of spins A and B.

The first inequality is a special case of the second one, corresponding to B = ∅.

Proof

Observe that the partition function is non-negative by definition.

Proof of first inequality: Expand

e−H(σ)=∏B∑k≥0JBkσBkk!=∑{kC}C∏BJBkBσBkBkB! ,

then

Z⟨σA⟩=∫dμ(σ)σAe−H(σ)=∑{kC}C∏BJBkBkB!∫dμ(σ)σAσBkB=∑{kC}C∏BJBkBkB!∫dμ(σ)∏j∈ΛσjnA(j)+kBnB(j) ,

where nA(j) stands for the number of times that j appears in A. Now, by invariance under spin flipping,

∫dμ(σ)∏jσjn(j)=0

if at least one n(j) is odd, and the same expression is obviously non-negative for even values of n. Therefore, Z⟨σA⟩≥0, hence also ⟨σA⟩≥0.

Proof of second inequality. For the second Griffiths inequality, double the random variable, i.e. consider a second copy of the spin, σ′, with the same distribution of σ. Then

⟨σAσB⟩−⟨σA⟩⟨σB⟩=⟨⟨σA(σB−σ'B)⟩⟩ .

Introduce the new variables

σj=τj+τj′ ,σ'j=τj−τj′ .

The doubled system ⟨⟨⋅⟩⟩ is ferromagnetic in τ,τ′ because −H(σ)−H(σ′) is a polynomial in τ,τ′ with positive coefficients

∑AJA(σA+σ'A)=∑AJA∑X⊂A[1+(−1)|X|]τA∖Xτ'X

Besides the measure on τ,τ′ is invariant under spin flipping because dμ(σ)dμ(σ′) is. Finally the monomials σA, σB−σ'B are polynomials in τ,τ′ with positive coefficients

σA=∑X⊂AτA∖Xτ'X ,σB−σ'B=∑X⊂B[1−(−1)|X|]τB∖Xτ'X .

The first Griffiths inequality applied to ⟨⟨σA(σB−σ'B)⟩⟩ gives the result.

More details are in and.

Extension: Ginibre inequality

The Ginibre inequality is an extension, found by Jean Ginibre, of the Griffiths inequality.

Formulation

Let (Γ, μ) be a probability space. For functions f, h on Γ, denote

⟨f⟩h=∫f(x)e−h(x)dμ(x)/∫e−h(x)dμ(x).

Let A be a set of real functions on Γ such that. for every f1,f2,...,fn in A, and for any choice of signs ±,

∬dμ(x)dμ(y)∏j=1n(fj(x)±fj(y))≥0.

Then, for any f,g,−h in the convex cone generated by A,

⟨fg⟩h−⟨f⟩h⟨g⟩h≥0.

Proof

Let

Zh=∫e−h(x)dμ(x).

Then

Zh2(⟨fg⟩h−⟨f⟩h⟨g⟩h)=∬dμ(x)dμ(y)f(x)(g(x)−g(y))e−h(x)−h(y)=∑k=0∞∬dμ(x)dμ(y)f(x)(g(x)−g(y))(−h(x)−h(y))kk!.

Now the inequality follows from the assumption and from the identity

f(x)=12(f(x)+f(y))+12(f(x)−f(y)).

Examples

Applications

This is because increasing the volume is the same as switching on new couplings JB for a certain subset B. By the second Griffiths inequality
∂∂JB⟨σA⟩=⟨σAσB⟩−⟨σA⟩⟨σB⟩≥0
Hence ⟨σA⟩ is monotonically increasing with the volume; then it converges since it is bounded by 1.
This property can be shown in a hierarchical approximation, that differs from the full model by the absence of some interactions: arguing as above with the second Griffiths inequality, the results carries over the full model.
⟨𝐬i⋅𝐬j⟩J,2β≤⟨σiσj⟩J,β
Hence the critical β of the XY model cannot be smaller than the double of the critical β of the Ising model
βcXY≥2βcIs ;
in dimension D = 2 and coupling J = 1, this gives
βcXY≥ln⁡(1+2)≈0.88 .

References

  1. ↑ Griffiths, R.B. (1967). "Correlations in Ising Ferromagnets. I". J. Math. Phys. 8 (3): 478–483. Bibcode:1967JMP.....8..478G. doi:10.1063/1.1705219.
  2. ↑ Kelly, D.J.; Sherman, S. (1968). "General Griffiths' inequalities on correlations in Ising ferromagnets". J. Math. Phys. 9 (3): 466–484. Bibcode:1968JMP.....9..466K. doi:10.1063/1.1664600.
  3. ↑ Griffiths, R.B. (1969). "Rigorous Results for Ising Ferromagnets of Arbitrary Spin". J. Math. Phys. 10 (9): 1559–1565. Bibcode:1969JMP....10.1559G. doi:10.1063/1.1665005.
  4. 1 2 3 Ginibre, J. (1970). "General formulation of Griffiths' inequalities". Comm. Math. Phys. 16 (4): 310–328. Bibcode:1970CMaPh..16..310G. doi:10.1007/BF01646537. S2CID 120649586.
  5. ↑ Glimm, J.; Jaffe, A. (1987). Quantum Physics. A functional integral point of view. New York: Springer-Verlag. ISBN 0-387-96476-2.
  6. ↑ Friedli, S.; Velenik, Y. (2017). Statistical Mechanics of Lattice Systems: a Concrete Mathematical Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 9781107184824.
  7. ↑ Dyson, F.J. (1969). "Existence of a phase-transition in a one-dimensional Ising ferromagnet". Comm. Math. Phys. 12 (2): 91–107. Bibcode:1969CMaPh..12...91D. doi:10.1007/BF01645907. S2CID 122117175.
  8. ↑ Aizenman, M.; Simon, B. (1980). "A comparison of plane rotor and Ising models". Phys. Lett. A. 76 (3–4): 281–282. Bibcode:1980PhLA...76..281A. doi:10.1016/0375-9601(80)90493-4.
  9. ↑ Fröhlich, J.; Park, Y.M. (1978). "Correlation inequalities and the thermodynamic limit for classical and quantum continuous systems". Comm. Math. Phys. 59 (3): 235–266. Bibcode:1978CMaPh..59..235F. doi:10.1007/BF01611505. S2CID 119758048.
  10. ↑ Griffiths, R.B. (1972). "Rigorous results and theorems". In C. Domb and M.S.Green (ed.). Phase Transitions and Critical Phenomena. Vol. 1. New York: Academic Press. p. 7.