As in other countries with a parliamentary system of government, the IAS is part of India's permanent bureaucracy and an inseparable part of the Government of India's executive branch. It is expected to remain politically neutral and provide administrative continuity across ruling parties or coalitions. Official commissions and researchers have documented frequent political interference in practice, particularly through transfers.
Upon confirmation of service, an IAS officer serves a probationary period as a sub-divisional magistrate in the state government. After completing this probation, the officer moves into an administrative role in a district as a district magistrate and collector, a role that lasts several years. After this tenure, an officer may be promoted to head a whole state administrative division as a divisional commissioner, or director/commissioner of a department.
About 180 officers are recruited each year, mainly through the Civil Services Examination (CSE); on 01 January 2025, 5,577 officers were in service against a sanctioned strength of 6,877. Debates about the service centre on political interference, accountability and corruption, and on whether a generalist service suits specialised modern governance, a concern that led to limited lateral entry in 2018, which was later cancelled following pressure from opposition parties over lack of reservations. The government maintains that it has not abandoned lateral entry.
During the East India Company period, the civil services were classified into three–covenanted, uncovenanted and special civil services. The covenanted civil service, or the Honourable East India Company's Civil Service (HEICCS), as it was called, largely comprised civil servants in senior government posts. The uncovenanted civil service was introduced solely to facilitate Indians' entry into the lower rung of the administration. The special service comprised specialised departments, such as the Indian Forest Service, the Imperial Police and the Indian Political Department, whose ranks were drawn from either the covenanted civil service or the Indian Army. The Imperial Police included many Indian Army officers, although after 1893 an annual exam was used to select its officers. In 1858 the HEICCS was replaced by the Indian Civil Service (ICS), which became the highest civil service in India between 1858 and 1947. The last appointments to the ICS were made in 1942.
There is no alternative to this administrative system... The Union will go, you will not have a united India if you do not have good All-India Service which has the independence to speak out its mind, which has [the] sense of security that you will standby[sic] your work... If you do not adopt this course, then do not follow the present Constitution. Substitute something else... these people are the instrument. Remove them and I see nothing but a picture of chaos all over the country.
There are three ways to join the IAS. One can enter the IAS by passing the Civil Services Examination, conducted by the Union Public Service Commission (UPSC). Officers recruited this way are called direct recruits or regular recruits (RR). Some officers are also recruited from the state civil services, and, in rare cases, selected from non-state civil services. The ratio between direct recruits and promotees is fixed at 2:1. All officers, regardless of the mode of entry, are appointed by the President of India.
Only about 180 candidates out of over 1million applicants who apply through CSE are successful, a success rate of less than 0.02percent.
Unlike candidates appointed to other civil services, a successful IAS candidate is rendered ineligible to retake the CSE. From 1951 to 1978, an IAS/IFS candidate had to submit two additional papers along with three optional papers (instead of just the three optional papers like for other civil services) to be eligible. The two additional papers were postgraduate-level submissions, compared with the graduate-level optional papers, and this distinction gave IAS and IFS officers a higher status. The two postgraduate-level submissions were later removed, but this has not changed the perceived higher status of the IAS and IFS. After selection, successful candidates undergo training at the Lal Bahadur Shastri National Academy of Administration in Mussoorie, Uttarakhand.
State cadres
Current cadre allocation policy
The central government announced a new cadre allocation policy for the All India Services in August 2017, claiming it would ensure national integration of the bureaucracy and an all-India character for the services. The Department of Personnel and Training was to divide the existing twenty-sixcadres into fivezones. Under the new policy, a candidate first selects their zones of preference, in descending order, then indicates a cadre preference from each preferred zone. The candidate then indicates their second cadre preference for each preferred zone. The zone and cadre preferences remain in the same order, and no change is permitted. Officers remain in their allocated cadre or are deputed to the Government of India.
Until 2008, there was no formal system that permitted the selection of a state cadre preferred by the candidate. If the candidate was not placed in a vacancy in their home state, they would be allocated to other states, which were selected from a roster in alphabetic order, starting from 'A', 'H', 'M' or 'T', depending on the year. For example, if in a particular year the roster begins from 'A', then the first candidate on the roster will go to the Andhra Pradesh state cadre, the next one to Bihar, and then to Chhattisgarh, Gujarat and so on in alphabetical order. The next year the roster starts from 'H', for either Haryana or Himachal Pradesh (the two states alternate roster years). This system, practiced since the mid-1980s, ensured that officers from different states were placed all over India.[citation needed]
The system of permanent state cadres resulted in wide disparities of professional exposure for officers when comparing those from developed versus less developed states. Changes in state cadres were only permitted on grounds of marriage to an All India Services officer of another state cadre or under other exceptional circumstances. The officers were allowed to go to their home state cadre on deputation for a limited period after which they would be required to return to their allocated cadre.
From 2008, IAS officers were assigned to state cadres at the beginning of their service. There was one cadre for each Indian state, except for twojoint cadres: Assam–Meghalaya and Arunachal Pradesh–Goa–Mizoram–Union Territories (AGMUT). The "insider-outsider ratio" (ratio of officers who were posted to their home states to those from other states) was maintained at 1:2, with one-third of the direct recruits being 'insiders' from the same state. The rest were posted as outsiders according to the state allocation roster in states other than their home states, as indicated by their preference.
Responsibilities of an IAS officer
The Prime Minister with IAS officers of 2017 batch in New Delhi
The typical functions performed by an IAS officer are:
To collect land revenue and function as court officials in matters of land revenue (for the revenue courts), to maintain law and order, to implement union and state government policies at the grass-roots level when posted to field positions i.e. as Sub-divisional magistrate, Additional District Magistrate, District magistrate and Divisional commissioner, and to act as an agent of the government in the field, i.e. to act as an intermediary between the public and the government.
To implement government policies, to execute government decisions, to oversee the day-to-day administration and serve as the head of the department, to coordinate with other departments/agencies, to represent the department when posted as Director/Commissioner of a Directorate/Commissionerate/Department.
To handle the administration and daily proceedings of the government, including the formulation and implementation of policy in consultation with the minister-in-charge of a specific ministry or department.
To contribute to policy formulation, and to make a final decision in certain matters, with the agreement of the minister concerned or the council of ministers (depending upon the weight of the matter), when posted at the higher level in the Government of India as a joint secretary, additional secretary, special secretary or secretary equivalent, secretary and Cabinet Secretary, and in state governments as secretary, principal secretary, additional chief secretary or special chief secretary and chief secretary.
Career progression
At the start of their careers, IAS officers receive district training with their home cadres, followed by their first posting. Their initial role is assistant collector cum sub-divisional magistrate, and they are placed in charge of a district sub-division. As assistant collector cum sub-divisional magistrate, they are entrusted with land revenue administration, maintaining law and order, and general administration and development work in the sub-district.
After completing probation, they take an executive role in a district as a district collector cum district magistrate, which lasts several years. After this tenure as a district magistrate, district collector, or deputy commissioner, they can be posted to various positions in the state government. These positions include secretary or principal secretary in different departments, director of a department, divisional commissioner, or chairman of a government corporation. The specific positions depend on the officer's seniority, experience, and performance. The highest positions that an IAS officer can attain include chief secretary of a state or cabinet secretary of the country.[citation needed]
In 2015, it was announced that a new designation of assistant secretary at the Central Secretariat had been created to enable new IAS officers to be posted to Delhi for a three-month assignment as part of their training regime. Previously, they were permitted to go on deputation only after nine years of service in their home cadre and assignment to the Central Secretariat. It was observed that these deputations lacked experience in central functions, prompting this change in their training. As part of the new system, IAS assistant secretaries are supposed to work on projects—a new policy in their respective areas—and present them to their respective ministries; of all projects, 36 are selected to be presented before all secretaries of the Government of India; consequently, 16 are selected to be before the Cabinet Secretary, and a final eight are selected for presentation before the Prime Minister.
↑Purchasing power parities (PPP) dollars for comparison.
↑IAS officers of the designations additional chief secretary and special chief secretary draw same pay as the chief secretary of the state but not same protocol.
12345678Alternate designations and nomenclature can differs from state to state.
↑Alternate designations – District collector, district officer, deputy commissioner.
↑Alternate designations – Chief development officer, district development officer, project director of DRDA, DUDA, IRDP etc., additional district collector, joint collector, additional deputy commissioner, CEO of zila parishad.
IAS officers can also be deputed to private organisations for a fixed tenure under Rule 6(2)(ii) of the Indian Administrative Service (Cadre) Rules, 1954.
Performance appraisal and accountability
The performance of IAS officers is assessed through an annual performance appraisal report under the All India Services (Performance Appraisal Report) Rules, 2007, which is reviewed before promotion or posting. Under rule 16(3), of the All India Services (Death-cum-Retirement Benefits) Rules, 1958, the government may retire an officer in public interest after 30 years of qualifying service, or at the age of 50. As officers enjoy strong constitutional protection against dismissal, critics argue that the service lacks effective consequences for poor performance. In 2020, the government launched Mission Karmyogi, a new capacity-building and performance evaluation programme for civil servants.
Criticisms of the country's bureaucracy have persisted over time, with detractors highlighting its cumbersome nature, slow decision-making processes, inefficiency, and instances of corruption. These deficiencies have become so widely acknowledged that the Indian bureaucracy often becomes the subject of relentless satirical portrayals in popular culture.
Research and assessment
Researchers broadly agree that the service has high entry standards with uneven performance in office. Lant Pritchett described India as a "flailing state", in which a capable elite at the top fails to control implementation further down. Devesh Kapur argues that the Indian state performs well on large, time-bound tasks such as elections but poorly on routine service delivery, and that it is understaffed for its population rather than oversized. The Second Administrative Reforms Commission (2008) recommended fixed tenures and opening senior posts to competition, including from outside the service. Economists such as Gurcharan Das link the scope for rent-seeking to the wide discretion officers exercised over licences, land, and permits, especially before the 1991 reforms.
Major concerns and reforms
Shortage of officers
In March 2026, the government informed the Lok Sabha that 1,300 of the 6,877 sanctioned IAS posts, about 19%, were vacant on 01 January 2025. The government has stated that the annual recruitment of IAS officers will not increase, to avoid affecting the career progression of existing officers and the overall structure of the service.
Lateral entry
Media personalities, some retired IAS officers and a few academics have argued in favour of lateral entry into the IAS to inject fresh blood into the service. They argue that it would help refresh the bureaucracy, offer competitiveness and bring in alternate perspectives. A counter-argument has been put forward that a lateral entry process could be manipulated due to corruption and cronyism. It is further argued that lateral entry would not lead to improvements in managerial performance or accountability, and while it may create synergy between the government and big businesses, it could also compromise the integrity of government. It has also been argued that it could weaken the bureaucracy instead. The union government has frequently ruled out lateral entry into the IAS.
Political influence
The IAS is hamstrung by political interference, outdated personnel procedures, and a mixed record on policy implementation, and it is in need of urgent reform. The Indian government should reshape recruitment and promotion processes, improve performance-based assessment of individual officers, and adopt safeguards that promote accountability while protecting bureaucrats from political meddling.
Several think tanks and media outlets have argued that the IAS is hamstrung by political influence within the service. It has been reported that many local political leaders have been seen to have interfered with IAS officers. Politicians have also exerted pressure on IAS officers by repeatedly transferring them, suspending them, beating them, and, in some extreme cases, killing them.
In 2012, Ashok Khemka, an IAS officer posted in Haryana, was reportedly transferred by the state Government under then Chief Minister Bhupinder Singh Hooda and faced a chargesheet, after preventing a land deal that involved Robert Vadra, husband of Congress leader Priyanka Gandhi and son-in-law of then Congress president Sonia Gandhi. Khemka, who retired in 2025, has been transferred over 50 times after exposing corruption in each department he was assigned to work.
In July 2013, Durga Shakti Nagpal, an IAS officer and bureaucrat from Uttar Pradesh, known for swift action against illegal sand mining, was suspended by Samajwadi Party leader and then Chief Minister Akhilesh Yadav, after she demolished a wall of an under-construction mosque in Jewar, as the construction was not cleared by the State Government. While Samajwadi Party leaders like Narendra Bhati and Azam Khan supported the decision to suspend her, the suspension order was met with protests and criticized by several social media users on Facebook and Twitter, including former IPS officer Kiran Bedi. Leaders from BSP and BJP, especially Nitin Gadkari, criticized the action. Nagpal's suspension was eventually revoked in September 2013 and was appointed as Joint Magistrate of Kanpur (Rural) the following month.
Several academic papers have shown IAS to be a significant contributor to crony capitalism in India. In 2015, it was reported by the Government of India that a hundred IAS officers had come under scrutiny by the Central Bureau of Investigation for alleged corruption. In 2017 Government records showed that 379 IAS officers had deliberately failed to submit details of their immovable assets (IPR). Since 2007, a number of chief secretaries and a principal secretary have been arrested in cases of graft or money laundering. IAS officers have been found amassing disproportionate assets and wealth varying from ₹200 crore (equivalent to ₹257croreorUS$27million in 2026), to ₹800 crore (equivalent to ₹10billionorUS$110million in 2026). In 2016 it was reported that the Government would provide the means to prosecute corrupt IAS officers, with the Ministry of Personnel, Public Grievances and Pensions agreeing to receive requests from private citizens seeking punitive measures against IAS officers even without supporting documentation.
In 2017 it was reported by the Department of Personnel and Training, part of the Ministry of Personnel, Public Grievances and Pensions, that, since 2014, one IAS officer was prematurely retired from service, ten IAS officers had been deemed to have resigned, five had their pensions cut, and a further eight IAS officers suffered a cut in remuneration.
During year 2020–21, 581 corruption charges were filed against IAS officers. Further, a total of 753 complaints were received against the IAS officers in 2019-20 and 643 in 2018–19.
Former IAS officer and RBI governorD. Subbarao said 25% IAS officers are corrupt, incompetent or inefficient; middle 50% started well but have become complacent and only 25% are truly delivering, while discussing his book with the media platforms.
Abandonment of service
In June 2015, The Telegraph reported that twelve IAS officers had gone missing, and had not reported to either the union or the state government for their allocated cadre. It was believed that they were working in foreign countries for companies such as Microsoft for more lucrative pay. The Asian Age later reported that the services of three of the twelve officers were likely to be terminated due to "prolonged absence from service".
Misuse of reservation
Several IAS officers have been accused of misuse of reservation by means of submitting fraudulent documents and certificates, especially for disability or caste. This has led to their dismissal or suspension, even jail time for fraud. This has denied fair opportunities to deserving candidates who are truly poor and meritorious.
In July 2024, Abhishek Singh, a former IAS officer of 2011 batch was investigated over the veracity of his disability certificate. He had claimed the LD category reservation which includes conditions such as cerebral palsy, leprosy-cured, dwarfism, acid attack victims and muscular dystrophy.
In August 2024, Ravi Kumar Sihag, an IAS officer from Madhya Pradesh was investigated for falsifying his documents to avail the EWS reservation meant for economically backward applicants. Sihag has been accused of transferring multiple acres of land to a relative to avail the EWS quota defrauding the selection committee.
In September 2024, Puja Khedkar, an IAS officer of Maharashtra cadre from the 2023 batch, was dismissed and investigated, after she was found to have submitted fraudulent caste and disability documents and certificates. The Union Public Service Commission filed a case against her, canceled her candidature, and stated that Khedkar was guilty of acting in contravention of the provisions of the Civil Services Examination-2022 Rules, and that Khedkar allegedly demanded special privileges such as a separate office, house, car, and staff, which she was not entitled to as a probationary officer. In May 2025, Khedkar was granted anticipatory bail by the Supreme Court, on the conditions that she co-operate with the law enforcement on the investigation.
Ashok Khemka, an IITian turned IAS officer of the batch of 1991, former Additional Chief Secretary in the Government of Haryana, who stood unshakably against corruption that the government transferred him over 66 times in his 34 years of service. He is one of the few IAS officers who carried integrity and faced one of highest number of transfers in their career.
12Schiavo-Campo, Salvatore; Tommaso, de Giulio; Mukherjee, Amitabha (1999). Government Employment and Pay: A Global and Regional Perspective. Washington D. C.: World Bank. p.23. OCLC913715804.
↑Saxena, Vaishali (2003). Bureaucracy on Wheels: Trauma of Transfers in the Indian Administrative Service. Jaipur: Aalekh Publishers. ISBN978-81-87359-21-0. OCLC191202280.
↑Srivastava, Ritesh K.(The Observer) (5 March 2012). "Empowering the EC". Zee News. Archived from the original on 19 December 2014. Retrieved 19 December 2014.
Saxena, Vaishali (2003). Bureaucracy on Wheels: Trauma of Transfers in the Indian Administrative Service. Jaipur: Aalekh Publishers. ISBN978-81-87359-21-0. OCLC191202280.
Schiavo-Campo, Salvatore; Tommaso, de Giulio; Mukherjee, Amitabha (1999). Government Employment and Pay: A Global and Regional Perspective. Washington D. C.: World Bank. OCLC913715804.
India portal 
_at_Rashtrapati_Bhavan,_in_New_Delhi_on_August_25,_2022.jpg)
