A version of Jefimenko's equations with a point-likeelectric charge as the source is known as the Heaviside–Feynman formula or Jefimenko–Feynman formula.
Here, is the vacuum permittivity, is the distance between the source point and the observation point , and is the unit vector pointing from the source toward the observer.
Because electromagnetic disturbances propagate at the speed of light, the fields observed at a point at time are determined by the state of the sources at an earlier retarded time, . The square brackets indicate that the enclosed quantities are evaluated at retarded time:
By performing the differentiations with respect to the observer's coordinates and time , the potentials are eliminated in favor of the direct functional dependence on the sources and . The fields have an implicit dependence on the position through , which must be taken into account in the differentiation.
This equation was published in 1962 by Wolfgang Panofsky and Melba Phillips in the second edition of the textbook Classical Electricity and Magnetism and is sometimes known as the Panofsky–Phillips equation. Panofsky and Phillips also published in this textbook the same expression as Jefimenko for the magnetic field (equation 14-34).
The three terms in the equation represent different physical contributions to the electric field. The first term is related to the position of the source charges at the retarded time, and corresponds to Coulomb's law evaluated at the retarded time. The second term is related to the velocity of the source charges at the retarded time. It provides a correction to the retarded Coulomb field by compensating retardation effects when the currents are constant in time (). This term vanishes in stationary regime when both and . The third term is produced by the acceleration of the source charges, and is referred to as the acceleration field or as the radiation field.
Distinction between near field and radiated field
The terms of the Panofsky–Phillips equations can be separated into two categories: The "near field" terms have a dependence, and are significant only in the immediate vicinity of the sources. The "far field" terms have a dependence. Due to their slower decrease with distance, they dominate as one moves away from the sources (see near field and far field).
In green are the near fields (decaying as 1/r²).
In red are the radiated fields (decaying as 1/r).
In the far-field region, near fields can be neglected and the expressions of the emitted fields reduce to:
Propagation of radiated fields in space
One therefore has , with E and B related by:
The Panofsky–Phillips equation allows one to directly distinguish between near fields and radiated fields for the electric field—something that is not apparent in Jefimenko’s formulation. In Jefimenko's electric field equation, both the second and third terms appear to contribute to the far field because they scale with . However, this is illusory; the longitudinal component of the third term cancels the dependence of the second term, leaving only the transverse components to propagate as radiation. Despite this complication, Jefimenko’s electric field equation is more compact and sometimes easier to use for calculations. One of the exceptions is the case of electric dipole radiation.
Heaviside–Feynman formula
Explanation of the variables relevant for the Heaviside–Feynman formula.
The Heaviside–Feynman formula, also known as the Jefimenko–Feynman formula, can be seen as the point-likeelectric charge version of Jefimenko's equations. It can be non-trivially deduced from them using Dirac functions, or using the Liénard-Wiechert potentials. The formula provides a natural generalization of the Coulomb's law for cases where the source charge is moving:
Here, is the electric charge, is a unit vector pointing from the observer to the charge and is the distance between observer and charge. Both of these quantities are evaluated at the retarded time.
Illustration of the retarded charge position for a particle moving in one spatial dimension: the observer sees the particle where it was, not where it is.
The first term in the formula for represents the Coulomb's law for the static electric field. The second term is the time derivative of the first Coulombic term multiplied by which is the propagation time of the electric field. Heuristically, this can be regarded as nature "attempting" to forecast what the present field would be by linear extrapolation to the present time. The last term, proportional to the second derivative of the vector , is sensitive to charge motion perpendicular to the line of sight. It can be shown that the electric field generated by this term is proportional to , where is the transverse acceleration in the retarded time. As it decreases only as with distance compared to the standard Coulombic behavior, this term is responsible for the long-range electromagnetic radiation caused by the accelerating charge.
The Heaviside–Feynman formula allows, for example, the derivation of the Larmor formula for overall radiation power of the accelerating charge.
Interpretations
Maxwell's equations are often interpreted as suggesting that spatially varying electric and magnetic fields induce one another, resulting in propagating electromagnetic waves. However, Oleg D. Jefimenko has argued that Maxwell's equations do not demonstrate a direct causal relationship between the fields as they are evaluated at the same instant in time.
Unlike in Maxwell equations, where both sides of the equality occur simultaneously, the fields on the left side of Jefimenko's equations are explicitly "caused" by the state of the sources at an earlier time. Under this interpretation, the electric and magnetic fields are not causing each other; instead, they are both effects of the same underlying cause: time-dependent electric charge and current distributions.
12Oleg D. Jefimenko, Electricity and Magnetism: An Introduction to the Theory of Electric and Magnetic Fields, Appleton-Century-Crofts (New-York - 1966). 2nd ed.: Electret Scientific (Star City - 1989), ISBN978-0-917406-08-9.
12345Griffiths, David J. (1999). Introduction To Electrodynamics (3rded.). Prentice Hall. pp.427–438. ISBN81-7758-293-3.
↑David J. Griffiths, Mark A. Heald, Time-dependent generalizations of the Biot–Savart and Coulomb laws, American Journal of Physics 59 (2) (1991), 111-117.
↑Introduction to Electrodynamics (3rd Edition), D. J. Griffiths, Pearson Education, Dorling Kindersley, 2007, ISBN81-7758-293-3.
1234Wolfgang K. H. Panofsky, Melba Phillips, Classical Electricity And Magnetism, Addison-Wesley (2nd. ed - 1962), Section 14.3. The electric field is written in a slightly different - but completely equivalent - form. Reprint: Dover Publications (2005), ISBN978-0-486-43924-2.
↑Kirk T. McDonald, The relation between expressions for time-dependent electromagnetic fields given by Jefimenko and by Panofsky and Phillips, American Journal of Physics 65 (11) (1997), 1074-1076.