Lloydia Salisb. ex Rchb. 1830 not Delile 1844 (Poaceae)
Nectarobothrium Ledeb.
Cronyxium Raf.
Hemierium Raf.
Hornungia Bernh. [1840], illegitimate homonym not Rchb. [1837] (Brassicaceae)
Reggeria Raf.
Bulbillaria Zucc.
Plecostigma Turcz.
Boissiera Haens. ex Willk. [1846], illegitimate homonym not Hochst. ex Steud. [1840] (syn of Bromus in Poaceae) nor Hochst. ex Griseb. [1852] (Poaceae)
The genus is named after the English naturalist Sir Thomas Gage (1781–1820). They were originally described as species of Ornithogalum, which, together with the usual yellow colour of the flowers, explains the English name yellow star-of-Bethlehem for the common European species, Gagea lutea.
Morphology
Gagea Lutea bulbous parts
The genus contains geophytes that use bulbous parts to survive unfavorable conditions and quickly reproduce during favorable conditions. Gagea species have persistent tepals, and are generally smaller in size than other closely related genera in the Liliaceae family.
The genus has varied leaf morphology. However, it is common for them to have basal leaves, some of which are cauline.
Gagea use two separate reproductive systems, insect pollination and asexualbulbil reproduction. There are two patterns of bulbil reproduction. In a more "continuous" mode, the plant "turns on" the ability to make bulbils, and continues to do so, only needing 2–10 millimeters cubed of total plant volume to begin vegetative reproduction. Once it reaches 100–300mm3 (0.0061–0.0183cuin) of volume, in some species, like G.lutea, the plant stops bulbil reproduction to begin expending energy towards a flowering phenophase. In some species, like G.spathacea, the plant never stops bulbil reproduction, and has no ability to reproduce sexually (through flowering).
It is common for Gagea species begin flowering early into spring. Many Gagea are spring ephemerals, and need to complete their flowering cycles before tree cover re-emerges. By mid-spring to summer, these species will store themselves in bulbous parts underground in anticipation of the next flowering period.
Speciation/Adaptations
Gagea lutea fruit
During their flowering periods, species show different environmental adaptations based on their habitats. G.sect. Platayspermum Boiss live in more arid regions, where it is common for insects to feed upon any exposed fruits or seeds from flowering plants. Therefore, the sect. uses large, tough sepals to ward off insects attempting to consume its fruit when it is in its developing phase. Other sects, such as G.lutea, commonly emerge immediately after snowmelt. Unlike in more arid regions, these species will have greener sepals after the flower is fully open.
Polyploidy and hybridization, in the case of Gagea, have large impacts on its ability to undergo speciation, as evident in European species of the genus. Previous studies have shown that these two processes can significantly contribute to the process of speciation, while retaining fertility within a population. Gagea, therefore, has the ability to contain unique species such as G.spathacea, being a nonaploid that causes the plant to be limited in post-zygotic reproduction. The species has spread across Central Europe, the Caucasus, Sweden, Denmark, the Netherlands, and Belgium with little to no genetic differences due to its use of clonal reproduction. However, through polyploidy and hybridization events, it still retains the ability to undergo evolution.
Heimer, V., Carnicero, P., Carrizo García, C., Hilpold, A., Dolenc Koce, J., Leal, J. L., Li, M., Varotto, C., Schönswetter, P., & Frajman, B. (2025). Hybridization and Polyploidy Shaped the Evolutionary History of a Complex of Cryptic Species in European Woodrushes (Luzula sect. Luzula). Systematic Biology. https://doi.org/10.1093/sysbio/syaf065
M. Zarrei, Wilkin, P., Ingrouille, M. J., & Chase, M. W. (2011). A revised infrageneric classification for Gagea Salisb (Tulipeae; Liliaceae): insights from DNA sequence and morphological data. Phytotaxa, 15(1), 44–56. https://doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.15.1.6
Peterson, A., Levichev, I. G., & Peterson, J. (2008). Systematics of Gagea and Lloydia (Liliaceae) and infrageneric classification of Gagea based on molecular and morphological data. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 46(2), 446–465. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2007.11.016
Pfeiffer, T., Klahr, A., Peterson, A., Levichev, I. G., & Schnittler, M. (2012). No sex at all? Extremely low genetic diversity in Gagea spathacea (Liliaceae) across Europe. Flora - Morphology, Distribution, Functional Ecology of Plants, 207(5), 372–378. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.flora.2012.03.002
Qiu, J., Lin, M., & Tan, D. (2023). Taxonomic implications of leaf morphology and epidermal anatomy for 14 species of Gagea (Liliaceae) from Xinjiang, China. Botanical Studies, 64(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40529-023-00405-9
Schnittler, M., Nursafina, A., Peterson, A., Peterson, J., Barnick, C., & Klahr, A. (2017). Studies of life history of Gagea graeca (Liliaceae) based on morphological and molecular methods. Botanical Studies, 58(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40529-017-0194-6
Schnittler, M., Peterson, A., Peterson, J., Beisenova, S., Bersimbaev, R. I., & Pfeiffer, T. (2013). Minor differences with big consequences: Reproductive patterns in the genus Gagea (Liliaceae). Flora - Morphology, Distribution, Functional Ecology of Plants, 208(10-12), 591–598. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.flora.2013.09.002
Schnittler, M., Pfeiffer, T., Harter, D., & Hamann, A. (2009). Bulbils contra seeds: reproductive investment in two species of Gagea (Liliaceae). Plant Systematics and Evolution, 279(1-4), 29–40. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00606-008-0143-7
Sunmonu, N., & Kudo, G. (2015). Warm temperature conditions restrict the sexual reproduction and vegetative growth of the spring ephemeral Gagea lutea (Liliaceae). Plant Ecology, 216(10), 1419–1431. https://eprints.lib.hokudai.ac.jp/repo/huscap/all/63014/
Tison, J.-M., Peterson, A., Dörte Harpke, & Peruzzi, L. (2012). Reticulate evolution of the critical Mediterranean Gagea sect. Didymobulbos (Liliaceae) and its taxonomic implications. Plant Systematics and Evolution, 299(2), 413–438. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00606-012-0731-4
.JPG){kind=small}
