Merike Talve | |
|---|---|
| Born | Merike Liz Talve January 31, 1957 Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada |
| Died | November 27, 1997 (aged 40) Vancouver, British Columbia |
| Education | University of British Columbia, Emily Carr College of Art and Design |
| Known for | Critical writing |
| Notable work | "Vestiges of the Avant-Garde in Installation", Luminous Sites: Ten Video Installations(1986). |
| Movement | Feminist art, Installation art, Media art |
| Spouse | Jonathan Gary Fisher |
Merike Talve (January 31, 1957 – November 27, 1997) was a Canadian curator, artist and independent writer who lived and worked in Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. Her body of work was centred on Contemporary Artists exhibiting in Vancouver in the 1980s. Her writing contributed to the documentation of Vancouver art exhibition related activities during this time period. She was known for her writing and curatorial activities related to contemporary art, including installation art, time-based media art, and the feminist art movement.
Merike Talve was born in Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada on January 31, 1957. She was a performer and a Rhythmic Gymnastics instructor in Richmond in 1976. Talve studied at Emily Carr College of Art and Design, where she earned a diploma in two-dimensional art. She earned a Bachelor of Arts degree in Art history from the University of British Columbia in 1981.
In the early 1980s, Talve worked for the Vanguard magazine and the Surrey Art Gallery in British Columbia, Canada. She was appointed as the curator to the Contemporary Art Gallery in Vancouver, British Columbia in 1987. Her curatorial activities at the Contemporary Art Gallery and Surrey Art Gallery included organizing exhibitions of the work of Canadian artists, such as Stan Douglas, Katherine Knight and Laura Vickerson,: 24 Kent Tate, Martin Honsich as well as writing critical reviews for exhibitions with artists, such as Paul Wong, Sara Diamond, Kim Tomczak, Vera Frenkel, among others.
Talve's body of work included essays and critical reviews, such as "Absense [sic] of Body Presence of Voice," from Voice Over (1985); Television Interference (1984); and Wallflower Order (1983). For the exhibition Luminous Sites: Ten Video Installations.(1986), In "Some Are Weather-Wise; Some Otherwise: Criticism and Vancouver," from the book Anthology: A Project of the Or Gallery (1991) William Wood examines "the question of who writes about what" in art criticism. Wood's cited Talve's critical review "Joey Morgan: Fugue" in Parachute magazine. In his essay, he discussed "genres of criticism." Wood described Talve's approach (in part) by stating that, "Talve settles into straight exposition, delaying any inflection of her description till the end. Her judgment at that point is a studied ambivalence, a trait shared by a good number of Morgan's reviewers." Talve's "Vestiges of the Avant-Garde in Installation", provided a conceptual and historical framework for this exhibition. Eugeni Bonet referred to Talve's essay "Vestiges of the Avant-Garde in Installation" in "La instalación como hipermedio (una aproximación)" from his book Escritos de vista y oído' (2016). In this essay, Bonet's cited in part Talve's views as follows,
Sin embargo, esta circunstancia posmoderna del arte de la instalacion no esta renida, en opion de merike talve, con el hecho de que pueda simultaneamente ser considerado como la unica de las formas contemporaneas de arte qu soporta directamente el peso de la vanguardia, tanto por recrear una interrelacion entre el arte y la realidad cotidiana – a traves de los elementos y cosas que extrae del prosaico entorno, como porque, muy a menudo, comporta un compromiso critico y etico caracteristico de las antagonias vanguardistas. [Talve, 1986]
However, this postmodern circumstance of installation art is not affected, in Merike Talve's opinion, with the fact that it can simultaneously be considered the only contemporary art form that directly supports the weight of the avant-garde, both for recreating an interrelation between art and everyday reality – through the elements and things that it extracts from the prosaic environment, such as because, very often, it involves a critical and ethical commitment characteristic of avant-garde antagonisms. [Talve, 1986] [sic]
Her work was published in Canadian art magazines, including the Vanguard magazine, ISSUE magazine, Video Guide, C Magazine, Parachute magazine, and the Parallelogramme. Her critical reviews included exhibitions that were presented at the Western Front Gallery Surrey Art Gallery, Or Gallery, UBC Fine Arts Gallery, Simon Fraser University Co-op Gallery, Emily Carr College of Art and Design Charles H. Scott Gallery, Non Commercial Gallery, Main Exit Gallery, Video Inn and Coburg Gallery in Vancouver.
Talve was married to Jonathan Gary Fisher. Her parents, Harri Talve and Marie (Õunpuu) Talve, met and married in Vancouver. Both her parents were born in Estonia. Harri, at the age of 13, relocated to Denmark due to displacement because of the war. Marie's family had relocated to Sweden. Harri immigrated to Canada in 1950 at age 20 and Marie in the early 1950s. The couple married and settled in Richmond. Merike Talve died in Vancouver on November 27, 1997.
Vestiges of the historical avant-garde are found in the shifting forms and delinquent nature of installation. Certain qualities earmarked by the avant-garde, such as newness, confrontation, and in insistence on creating a relationship between art and the outside world, are generally shared by installation's precursors, and in some ways by installations in its present form. Installations may unwittingly be the only one of contemporary art's forms to directly bear the burden of the avant-garde.
Sin embargo, esta circunstancia posmoderna del arte de la instalacion no esta renida, en opion de merike talve, con el hecho de que pueda simultaneamente ser considerado como la unica de las formas contemporaneas de arte qu soporta directamente el peso de la vanguardia, tanto por recrear una interrelacion entre el arte y la realidad cotidiana – a traves de los elementos y cosas que extrae del prosaico entorno, como porque, muy a menudo, comporta un compromiso critico y etico caracteristico de las antagonias vanguardistas. Aunque, como consecuencia de todo ello – del peso de la vanguaradia transormado en peso de la historia – , [la instalacion] tambien se situa a uno paso de ser neutralizada por esta [nuestra] sociedad: una condicion familiar y temida por el movimiento vanguardist en sus ultimos anos. [Talve, 1986] However, this postmodern circumstance of installation art is not affected, in Merike Talve's opinion, with the fact that it can simultaneously be considered the only contemporary art form that directly supports the weight of the avant-garde, both for recreating an interrelation between art and everyday reality – through the elements and things that it extracts from the prosaic environment, such as because, very often, it involves a critical and ethical commitment characteristic of avant-garde antagonisms. Although, as a consequence of all this – from the weight of vanguaradia transformed into the weight of history -, [the facility] is also one step away from being neutralized by this [our] society: a family condition and feared by the avant-garde movement in his last years. [Talve, 1986] [sic]
{{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)Tate's show is about power, mainly the misuse and misunderstanding of power... It's about the power of power, no matter what the cost.
Whatever the Voice Over catalogue may have to say about it – and after trudging through both Pakasaar's essay and Merike Talve's "Absense [sic] of Body Presence of Voice" several times I'm still not entirely clear what that might be – Voice Over lets us know that women artists are still angry.
The Stalker at the Contemporary Art Gallery: humour, ecology, multi-nationalism, and beautiful 3-D work all in one spot.
Curator Merike Talve writes that Honisch "accepts his enigmatic visions for what they are, offers them up to the world for scrutiny and delights in the fact that they will never be fully intelligible, not even to himself."
Marion Barling's videotape manages to capture the 'collaborative strength' of this group and a spirit which "...slices below the aging skin of formal anti-content Modernist tradition to a feminist art with different and urgent values."
To expand the question of who writes about what, it is worthwhile to look at the genres of criticism, starting with the short review, usually penned by the occasional critic-an off-duty journalist or a curator, an intrigued artist or writer. In this particular case, Merike Talve's review of Morgan's Fugue in Parachute is appropriate, as is Roy Arden's Vanguard review of Ken Lum's Youth Portraits. These are exemplary reviews in the terms of the typologies already described. Talve uses almost a thousand words of description prior to maybe three hundred of discussion, while Arden's ration would be precisely the reverse. Admittedly, Morgan's Fugue, involving two specific sites, one real-time and one reconstructed duration, and much administrative delay, calls for explanation in a big way, yet Talve settles into straight exposition, delaying any inflection of her description till the end. Her judgement at that point is a studied ambivalence, a trait shared by a good number of Morgan's reviewer's.
Alan Storey's Draw (cf. Merike Talve's review of the Vancouver installation, Vanguard, February 1985) is brilliant compression of the bureaucratization of art, the bureaucratization even of expressiveness itself.