Perfect group

In mathematics, specifically in group theory, a group is said to be perfect if it equals its own commutator subgroup (i.e., has trivial abelianization); equivalently, if the group has no non-trivial abelian quotients.

Examples

The smallest (non-trivial) perfect group is the alternating group . More generally, any non-abelian simple group is perfect since the commutator subgroup is a normal subgroup with abelian quotient. However, a perfect group need not be simple; for example, the special linear group over the field with 5 elements, SL(2,5) (or the binary icosahedral group, which is isomorphic to it) is perfect but not simple: it has a non-trivial center containing

.

The direct product of any two simple non-abelian groups is perfect but not simple; the commutator of two elements is

.

Since commutators in each simple group form a generating set, pairs of commutators form a generating set of the direct product.

The fundamental group of is a perfect group of order 120.

More generally, a quasisimple group (a perfect central extension of a simple group) that is a non-trivial extension (and therefore not a simple group itself) is perfect but not simple; this includes all the insoluble non-simple finite special linear groups as extensions of the projective special linear group (indeed, is an extension of , which is isomorphic to A5). Similarly, the special linear group over the real and complex numbers is perfect, but the general linear group is never perfect (except when trivial or over , where it equals the special linear group), as the determinant gives a non-trivial abelianization and indeed the commutator subgroup is .

A non-trivial perfect group, however, is necessarily not solvable; and 4 divides its order (if finite), moreover, if 8 does not divide the order, then 3 does.

Any quotient of a perfect group is perfect. A non-trivial finite perfect group that is not simple must then be an extension of at least one smaller simple non-abelian group. But it can be the extension of more than one simple group. In fact, the direct product of perfect groups is also perfect.

Every perfect group determines another perfect group (its universal central extension) together with a surjection whose kernel is in the center of , such that is universal with this property. The kernel of is called the Schur multiplier of because it was first studied by Issai Schur in 1904; it is isomorphic to the homology group .

In the plus construction of algebraic K-theory, if we consider the group for a commutative ring , then the subgroup of elementary matrices forms a perfect subgroup.

Ore's conjecture

As the commutator subgroup is generated by commutators, a perfect group may contain elements that are products of commutators but not themselves commutators. Øystein Ore showed in 1951 that the alternating groups on five or more elements contained only commutators, and conjectured that this was so for all the finite non-abelian simple groups. Ore's conjecture was finally proven in 2008. The proof relies on the classification theorem.

Grün's lemma

A basic fact about perfect groups is Grün's lemma, due to Otto Grün. It states that the quotient of a perfect group by its center is centerless (has trivial center).

Proof: If is a perfect group, let and denote the first two terms of the upper central series of (i.e., is the center of , and is the center of ). If and are subgroups of , denote the commutator of and by and note that and , and consequently

By the three subgroups lemma (or equivalently, by the Hall-Witt identity), it follows that

Therefore , and thus the center of the quotient group is the trivial group.

As a consequence, all higher centers (that is, higher terms in the upper central series) of a perfect group equal the center.

Group homology

In terms of group homology, a perfect group is precisely one whose first homology group vanishes: . Indeed, the first homology group of a group is exactly the abelianization of the group, and perfect groups are by definition those with trivial abelianization. An advantage of this definition is that it admits strengthening:

Superperfect groups

A superperfect group is one whose first two homology groups vanish:

.

A finite perfect group is superperfect if and only if it is its own universal central extension (UCE), as the second homology group of a perfect group parametrizes central extensions.

A notable example is this: if is the fundamental group of a homology sphere, then is superperfect. The smallest finite, non-trivial superperfect group is the binary icosahedral group (the fundamental group of the Poincaré homology sphere).

The alternating group is perfect but not superperfect: it has a non-trivial central extension, the binary icosahedral group, which is superperfect (and is in fact its UCE). In fact, for , the alternating group is perfect but not superperfect, with for .

More generally, the projective special linear groups are simple (hence perfect) except for and , but not superperfect, with the special linear groups as central extensions. This family includes the binary icosahedral group as UCE of .

Acyclic groups

An acyclic group is one for which all (reduced) homology groups vanish: for . (This is equivalent to all homology groups other than vanishing.) Equivalently, its classifying space is an acyclic space.

Every acyclic group is superperfect, but the converse is not true: the binary icosahedral group is superperfect, but not acyclic.

Quasi-perfect group

In algebraic K-theory, a group is said to be quasi-perfect if its commutator subgroup is perfect; formally, a quasi-perfect group satisfies (the commutator of the commutator subgroup is the commutator subgroup), while a perfect group is one such that (the commutator subgroup is the whole group).

References

Citations

  1. ↑ Milnor (2006).
  2. ↑ Tobias Kildetoft (7 July 2015), answer to "Is a non-trivial finite perfect group of order 4n?". Mathematics StackExchange. Accessed 7 July 2015.
  3. ↑ Liebeck, Martin; O'Brien, E.A.; Shalev, Aner; Tiep, Pham Huu (2010). "The Ore conjecture" (PDF). Journal of the European Mathematical Society . 12 (4): 939–1008. doi:10.4171/JEMS/220.
  4. ↑ Grün (1935), p. 3, theorem 4.
  5. ↑ Berrick & Hillman (2003).
  6. ↑ Karoubi (1973), pp. 301–411.
  7. ↑ Inassaridze (1995), p. 76.

Sources