Removable singularity

A graph of a parabola with a removable singularity at x = 2

In complex analysis, a removable singularity of a holomorphic function is a point at which the function is undefined, but it is possible to redefine the function at that point in such a way that the resulting function is regular in a neighbourhood of that point.

For instance, the (unnormalized) sinc function, as defined by

sinc(z)=sin⁡zz

has a singularity at ⁠z=0⁠. This singularity can be removed by defining ⁠sinc(0):=1⁠, which is the limit of sinc as ⁠z⁠ tends to ⁠0⁠. The resulting function is holomorphic. In this case the problem was caused by sinc being given an indeterminate form. Taking a power series expansion for ⁠sin⁡(z)z⁠ around the singular point shows that

sinc(z)=1z(∑k=0∞(−1)kz2k+1(2k+1)!)=∑k=0∞(−1)kz2k(2k+1)!=1−z23!+z45!−z67!+⋯.

Formally, if U⊂ℂ is an open subset of the complex plane ⁠ℂ⁠, a∈U a point of ⁠U⁠, and f:U∖{a}→ℂ is a holomorphic function, then a is called a removable singularity for f if there exists a holomorphic function g:U→ℂ which coincides with f on ⁠U∖{a}⁠. We say f is holomorphically extendable over U if such a g exists.

Riemann's theorem

Riemann's theorem on removable singularities is as follows:

Theorem— Let D⊂ℂ be an open subset of the complex plane, a∈D a point of D and f a holomorphic function defined on the set ⁠D∖{a}⁠. The following are equivalent:

  1. f is holomorphically extendable over ⁠a⁠.
  2. f is continuously extendable over ⁠a⁠.
  3. There exists a neighborhood of a on which f is bounded.
  4. ⁠limz→a(z−a)f(z)=0⁠.

The implications 1 ⇒ 2 ⇒ 3 ⇒ 4 are trivial. To prove 4 ⇒ 1, we first recall that the holomorphy of a function at a is equivalent to it being analytic at a (proof), i.e. having a power series representation. Define

h(z)={(z−a)2f(z)z≠a,0z=a.

Clearly, ⁠h⁠ is holomorphic on ⁠D∖{a}⁠, and there exists

h′(a)=limz→a(z−a)2f(z)−0z−a=limz→a(z−a)f(z)=0

by 4, hence ⁠h⁠ is holomorphic on ⁠D⁠ and has a Taylor series about ⁠a⁠:

h(z)=c0+c1(z−a)+c2(z−a)2+c3(z−a)3+….

We have ⁠c0=h(a)=0⁠ and ⁠c1=h′(a)=0⁠; therefore

h(z)=c2(z−a)2+c3(z−a)3+….

Hence, where ⁠z≠a⁠, we have:

f(z)=h(z)(z−a)2=c2+c3(z−a)+….

However,

g(z)=c2+c3(z−a)+⋯.

is holomorphic on ⁠D⁠, thus an extension of ⁠f⁠.

Other kinds of singularities

Unlike functions of a real variable, holomorphic functions are sufficiently rigid that their isolated singularities can be completely classified. A holomorphic function's singularity is either not really a singularity at all, i.e. a removable singularity, or one of the following two types:

  1. In light of Riemann's theorem, given a non-removable singularity, one might ask whether there exists a natural number m such that ⁠limz→a(z−a)m+1f(z)=0⁠. If so, a is called a pole of f and the smallest such m is the order of ⁠a⁠. So removable singularities are precisely the poles of order ⁠0⁠. A meromorphic function blows up uniformly near its other poles.
  2. If an isolated singularity a of f is neither removable nor a pole, it is called an essential singularity. The Great Picard Theorem shows that such an f maps every punctured open neighborhood U∖{a} to the entire complex plane, with the possible exception of at most one point.

See also