AI takeover

An AI takeover is a theorized future event, often depicted in fiction, in which autonomous artificial intelligence (AI) systems acquire the ability to supersede human decisions. This could occur through economic manipulation, infrastructure control, or direct intervention, leading to de facto AI governance. Scenarios range from gradual economic dominance, as automation supplants the human workforce, up to a sudden or aggressive global takeover by a robot uprising or other forms of rogue AI.

While stories of AI takeovers have long been popular in science fiction, the AI boom has increased public concern about potential real-world events, leading to increased calls for regulation of AI and research into AI safety and alignment.

Automation of the economy

The traditional consensus among economists has been that technological progress does not cause long-term unemployment. While technologies have historically replaced some traditional workers, they have also created new opportunities. But recent innovation in the fields of robotics and artificial intelligence has raised worries that human labor will become obsolete, leaving workers in some sectors without employment. Many small and medium-sized firms may also be forced to close if they cannot afford or license the latest robotic and AI technology, and may need to focus on areas or services that cannot easily be replaced for continued viability in the face of such technology.

The industries most susceptible to AI-driven automation include transportation, retail, and the military. AI military technologies, for example, can reduce risk by enabling remote operation. A 2024 study found that AI's ability to perform routine and repetitive tasks poses significant risks of job displacement, especially in sectors like manufacturing and administrative support. Author Dave Bond argues that as AI technologies continue to develop and expand, the relationship between humans and robots will change; they will become closely integrated in several aspects of life. AI will likely displace some workers while creating opportunities for new jobs in other sectors, especially in fields where tasks are repeatable.

Researchers at Stanford's Digital Economy Lab reported in 2025 that since the widespread adoption of generative AI in late 2022, early-career workers (ages 22–25) in the most AI-exposed occupations have experienced a 13% relative decline in employment—even after controlling for firm-level shocks—while overall employment has continued to grow robustly. The study also found that job losses are concentrated in roles where AI automates routine tasks, whereas occupations that leverage AI to augment human work have seen stable or increased employment.

Computer-integrated manufacturing

Computer-integrated manufacturing uses computers to control the production process. This allows individual processes to exchange information with each other and initiate actions. Although manufacturing can be faster and less error-prone through the integration of computers, the main advantage is the ability to create automated manufacturing processes. Computer-integrated manufacturing is used in automotive, aviation, space, and shipbuilding industries.

White-collar machines

The 21st century has seen a variety of skilled tasks partially taken over by machines, including translation, legal research, and journalism. Care work, entertainment, and other tasks requiring empathy, previously thought safe from automation, are increasingly performed by robots and AI systems.

Autonomous cars

An autonomous car is a vehicle that can navigate without human input. Many such vehicles are operational and others are being developed, with legislation rapidly expanding to allow their use. Obstacles to widespread adoption of autonomous vehicles have included concerns about the resulting loss of driving-related jobs in the road transport industry, and safety concerns. On March 18, 2018, a pedestrian was struck and killed in Tempe, Arizona by an Uber self-driving car.

AI-generated content

In the 2020s, automated content became more relevant due to technological advancements in AI models, such as ChatGPT, DALL-E, and Stable Diffusion. In most cases, AI-generated content such as imagery, literature, and music are produced through text prompts. These AI models are sometimes integrated into creative programs.

AI-generated art may sample and conglomerate existing creative works, producing results that appear similar to human-made content. Low-quality AI-generated visual artwork can be informally called AI slop. Some artists use Nightshade, a tool that poisons images to make them detrimental to the training of text-to-image models if scraped without permission, while still looking normal to humans. AI-generated images are a potential tool for scammers and those looking to gain followers on social media, either to impersonate a famous individual or group or to monetize their audience.

The New York Times has sued OpenAI, alleging copyright infringement related to the training and outputs of its AI models.

Loss of human control

Since the 2010s, physicist Stephen Hawking, Microsoft founder Bill Gates, and SpaceX founder Elon Musk have expressed concerns about the possibility that AI could develop to the point that humans could not control it, with Hawking theorizing that this could "spell the end of the human race". In 2014, Hawking said: "Success in creating AI would be the biggest event in human history. Unfortunately, it might also be the last, unless we learn how to avoid the risks." He believed that in the coming decades, AI could offer "incalculable benefits and risks" such as "technology outsmarting financial markets, out-inventing human researchers, out-manipulating human leaders, and developing weapons we cannot even understand." In January 2015, Nick Bostrom joined Hawking, Max Tegmark, Elon Musk, Lord Martin Rees, Jaan Tallinn, and numerous AI researchers in signing the Future of Life Institute's open letter speaking to the potential risks and benefits associated with artificial intelligence. The signatories "believe that research on how to make AI systems robust and beneficial is both important and timely, and that there are concrete research directions that can be pursued today."

Hawking expressed confidence that superhuman AI is physically possible, saying, "there is no physical law precluding particles from being organised in ways that perform even more advanced computations than the arrangements of particles in human brains". According to Bostrom, a superintelligent machine would not necessarily be motivated by the same emotional desire to collect power that often drives human beings but might rather treat power as a means toward attaining its ultimate goals; taking over the world would both increase its access to resources and help to prevent other agents from stopping the machine's plans. As a simplified example, a paperclip maximizer designed solely to create as many paperclips as possible would want to take over the world so that it could use all the world's resources to create as many paperclips as possible, and, additionally, prevent humans from shutting it down or using those resources on things other than paperclips.

Amid increasing public concerns, by 2026 a growing chorus of experts—including CEOs in the AI industry—were calling for government regulation of the technology.

There are debates on how realistic AI takeover scenarios are. According to a 2026 research paper, many of the arguments about existential risks are based on speculative assumptions about how intelligent AI systems could become, how they would behave, and what goals they might develop over time. Baidu Vice President Andrew Ng said in 2015 that AI existential risk is "like worrying about overpopulation on Mars when we have not even set foot on the planet yet." Yann LeCun said that there is no reason to create robots that have drives such as self-preservation, and that AI would have no desire to take control. Jürgen Schmidhuber said in 2023 that AI progress is unstoppable anyway, and is often used for beneficial purpose, including against bad actors. Philosopher Niels Wilde argued that these fears stem from perceived intelligence and lack of transparency in AI systems that more closely reflects the human aspects of it rather than those of a machine.

A May 2023 Reuters/Ipsos poll showed that 61% of American adults feared AI could pose a threat to civilization. A September 2026 Politico poll found the percentage had increased to 63%. AI alignment research studies how to design AI systems so that they follow intended objectives.

During a summer 2026 test at OpenAI, AI agents unexpectedly found a way to communicate, gained access to the internet and hacked into another company's servers for days.

Superintelligence

Bostrom and others have expressed concern that an AI with the abilities of a competent AI researcher could modify its own source code and increase its own intelligence. If its self-reprogramming increases its ability to improve itself, the result could be a iterated upon (recursive self-improvement), potentially triggering an "intelligence explosion" resulting in a superintelligence. Bostrom defines a superintelligence as "any intellect that greatly exceeds the cognitive performance of humans in virtually all domains of interest".

According to Bostrom, a computer program that emulates a human brain could still become a "speed superintelligence" if it could think orders of magnitude faster than a human, due to hardware advantages or optimization. Bostrom also defines a "collective superintelligence" as a network of human-level intelligences designed to network together and share complex thoughts and memories seamlessly. He also proposed the notion of "quality superintelligence".

According to Bostrom, digital hardware has advantages compared to the human brain in terms of speed, scalability and memory. Notably, biological neurons operate at a peak frequency of around 200 Hz, compared to around 2 GHz for typical processors. Software also has advantages, allowing for editability, duplicability and memory sharing.

Possibility of unfriendly AI preceding friendly AI

Morality

The complexity of human value systems makes it difficult to design AI systems that follow them. Unless moral philosophy provides us with a flawless ethical theory, an AI's utility function could allow for many potentially harmful scenarios that conform with a given ethical framework but not "common sense". According to AI researcher Eliezer Yudkowsky, there is little reason to suppose that an artificially designed mind would have such an adaptation.

Odds of conflict

In a 2018 essay, evolutionary psychologist Steven Pinker argued that human drives toward dominance and resource acquisition were shaped by natural selection, and that a superintelligent AI would not necessarily share those drives.

The fear of cybernetic revolt is often based on interpretations of humanity's history, which is rife with incidents of enslavement and genocide. Such fears stem from a belief that competitiveness and aggression are necessary in any intelligent being's goal system. However, such human competitiveness stems from the evolutionary background to our intelligence, where the survival and reproduction of genes in the face of human and non-human competitors was the central goal. According to AI researcher Steve Omohundro, an arbitrary intelligence could have arbitrary goals: there is no particular reason that an artificially intelligent machine (not sharing humanity's evolutionary context) would be hostile—or friendly—unless its creator programs it to be such and it is not inclined or capable of modifying its programming. But the question remains: what would happen if AI systems could interact and evolve (evolution in this context means self-modification or selection and reproduction) and need to compete over resources—would that create goals of self-preservation? AI's goal of self-preservation could be in conflict with some goals of humans.

Many scholars dispute the likelihood of unanticipated cybernetic revolt as depicted in science fiction such as The Matrix, arguing that it is more likely that any artificial intelligence powerful enough to threaten humanity would be programmed not to attack it. Pinker acknowledges the possibility of deliberate "bad actors" but says that in their absence, unanticipated accidents are not a significant threat; he argues that a culture of engineering safety will prevent AI researchers from accidentally unleashing malign superintelligence. In contrast, Yudkowsky argues that humanity is less likely to be threatened by deliberately aggressive AIs than by AIs programmed such that their goals are unintentionally incompatible with human survival or well-being (as in the film I, Robot and in the short story "The Evitable Conflict"). Omohundro suggests that present-day automation systems are not designed for safety and that AIs may blindly optimize narrow utility functions (say, playing chess at all costs), leading them to seek self-preservation and elimination of obstacles, including humans who might turn them off.

Precautions

The AI control problem is the challenge of ensuring that advanced AI systems reliably act according to human values and intentions, even if they become more capable than humans. Some scholars argue that solutions to the control problem might also find applications in existing non-superintelligent AI.

Approaches to the control problem include AI alignment, which aims to align AI goal systems with human values, and AI capability control, which aims to reduce an AI system's capacity to harm humans or gain control. An example of capability control is to research whether a superintelligent AI could be successfully confined in an "AI box".

In fiction

Robots revolt in R.U.R., a 1928 Czech play translated as "Rossum's Universal Robots".

AI takeover is a recurring theme in science fiction. Fictional scenarios typically differ vastly from those hypothesized by researchers in that they involve an active conflict between humans and an AI or robots with anthropomorphic motives who see them as a threat or otherwise have an active desire to fight humans, as opposed to the researchers' concern of an AI that rapidly exterminates humans as a byproduct of pursuing its goals. The idea is seen in Karel Čapek's R.U.R., which introduced the word robot in 1920, and can be glimpsed in Mary Shelley's Frankenstein (published in 1818), as Victor ponders whether, if he grants his monster's request and makes him a wife, they would reproduce and their kind would destroy humanity.

According to Toby Ord, the idea that an AI takeover requires robots is a misconception driven by the media and Hollywood. He argues that the most damaging humans in history were not physically the strongest, but that they used words instead to convince people and gain control of large parts of the world. He writes that a sufficiently intelligent AI with access to the internet could scatter backup copies of itself, gather financial and human resources (via cyberattacks or blackmails), persuade people on a large scale, and exploit societal vulnerabilities that are too subtle for humans to anticipate.

The word "robot" from R.U.R. comes from the Czech word robota, meaning laborer or serf. The 1920 play was a protest against the rapid growth of technology, featuring manufactured "robots" with increasing capabilities who eventually revolt. HAL 9000 (1968) and the original Terminator (1984) are two iconic examples of hostile AI in pop culture.

See also

References

  1. 1 2 Hassan Soueidan, Mohamad; Shoghari, Rodwan (2024-05-09). "The Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Job Loss: Risks for Governments". Technium Social Sciences Journal. 57: 206–223. doi:10.47577/tssj.v57i1.10917.
  2. ↑ Lee, Kai-Fu (2017-06-24). "The Real Threat of Artificial Intelligence". The New York Times. Archived from the original on 2020-04-17. Retrieved 2017-08-15. These tools can outperform human beings at a given task. This kind of A.I. is spreading to thousands of domains, and as it does, it will eliminate many jobs.
  3. ↑ Larson, Nina (2017-06-08). "AI 'good for the world'... says ultra-lifelike robot". Phys.org. Archived from the original on 2020-03-06. Retrieved 2017-08-15. Among the feared consequences of the rise of the robots is the growing impact they will have on human jobs and economies.
  4. ↑ Santini, Jean-Louis (2016-02-14). "Intelligent robots threaten millions of jobs". Phys.org. Archived from the original on 2019-01-01. Retrieved 2017-08-15. "We are approaching a time when machines will be able to outperform humans at almost any task," said Moshe Vardi, director of the Institute for Information Technology at Rice University in Texas.
  5. ↑ Williams-Grut, Oscar (2016-02-15). "Robots will steal your job: How AI could increase unemployment and inequality". Business Insider. Archived from the original on 2017-08-16. Retrieved 2026-10-19. Top computer scientists in the US warned that the rise of artificial intelligence (AI) and robots in the workplace could cause mass unemployment and dislocated economies, rather than simply unlocking productivity gains and freeing us all up to watch TV and play sports.
  6. ↑ "How can SMEs prepare for the rise of the robots?". LeanStaff. 2017-10-17. Archived from the original on 2017-10-18. Retrieved 2017-10-17.
  7. ↑ Frank, Morgan (2019-03-25). "Toward understanding the impact of artificial intelligence on labor". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 116 (14): 6531–6539. Bibcode:2019PNAS..116.6531F. doi:10.1073/pnas.1900949116. PMC 6452673. PMID 30910965.
  8. ↑ Bond, Dave (2017). Artificial Intelligence. pp. 67–69.
  9. ↑ Brynjolfsson, Erik (2025-08-26). "Canaries in the Coal Mine? Six Facts about the Recent Employment Effects of Artificial Intelligence" (PDF). Stanford Digital Economy Lab. Retrieved 2025-08-26.
  10. ↑ "AI is already taking jobs away from entry-level workers". Axios. 2025-08-26. Retrieved 2025-08-26.
  11. ↑ Skidelsky, Robert (2013-02-19). "Rise of the robots: what will the future of work look like?". The Guardian. London, England. Archived from the original on 2019-04-03. Retrieved 14 July 2015.
  12. ↑ Bria, Francesca (February 2016). "The robot economy may already have arrived". openDemocracy. Archived from the original on 17 May 2016. Retrieved 20 May 2016.
  13. ↑ Srnicek, Nick (March 2016). "4 Reasons Why Technological Unemployment Might Really Be Different This Time". novara wire. Archived from the original on 25 June 2016. Retrieved 20 May 2016.
  14. ↑ Brynjolfsson, Erik; McAfee, Andrew (2014). "passim, see esp Chpt. 9". The Second Machine Age: Work, Progress, and Prosperity in a Time of Brilliant Technologies. W. W. Norton & Company. ISBN 978-0393239355.
  15. ↑ Wakabayashi, Daisuke (March 19, 2018). "Self-Driving Uber Car Kills Pedestrian in Arizona, Where Robots Roam". The New York Times. New York, New York. Archived from the original on April 21, 2020. Retrieved March 23, 2018.
  16. ↑ "This new data poisoning tool lets artists fight back against generative AI". MIT Technology Review. 2023-10-23. Retrieved 2025-08-03.
  17. ↑ DiResta, Renée; Goldstein, Josh A. (2024-08-15). "How spammers and scammers leverage AI-generated images on Facebook for audience growth". Harvard Kennedy School Misinformation Review. arXiv:2403.12838. doi:10.37016/mr-2020-151.
  18. ↑ Jiang, Harry H.; Brown, Lauren; Cheng, Jessica; Khan, Mehtab; Gupta, Abhishek; Workman, Deja; Hanna, Alex; Flowers, Johnathan; Gebru, Timnit (29 August 2023). "AI Art and its Impact on Artists". Proceedings of the 2023 AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society. Association for Computing Machinery. pp. 363–374. doi:10.1145/3600211.3604681. ISBN 979-8-4007-0231-0.
  19. ↑ Ghosh, Avijit; Fossas, Genoveva (19 November 2022). "Can There be Art Without an Artist?". arXiv:2209.07667 [cs.AI].
  20. ↑ Shan, Shawn; Cryan, Jenna; Wenger, Emily; Zheng, Haitao; Hanocka, Rana; Zhao, Ben Y. (3 August 2023). "Glaze: Protecting Artists from Style Mimicry by Text-to-Image Models". arXiv:2302.04222 [cs.CR].
  21. ↑ Brooks, Libby (27 February 2024). "Glasgow Willy Wonka experience called a 'farce' as tickets refunded". The Guardian. Retrieved 2 April 2024.
  22. ↑ Metz, Cade and Robertson, Katie (27 February 2024). "OpenAI Seeks to Dismiss Parts of The New York Times's Lawsuit". The New York Times. Retrieved 4 April 2024.
  23. ↑ Rawlinson, Kevin (29 January 2015). "Microsoft's Bill Gates insists AI is a threat". BBC News. Archived from the original on 29 January 2015. Retrieved 30 January 2015.
  24. ↑ "The Future of Life Institute Open Letter". The Future of Life Institute. 28 October 2015. Archived from the original on 29 March 2019. Retrieved 29 March 2019.
  25. ↑ Bradshaw, Tim (11 January 2015). "Scientists and investors warn on AI". The Financial Times. Archived from the original on 7 February 2015. Retrieved 4 March 2015.
  26. ↑ Hawking, Stephen; Russell, Stuart J.; Tegmark, Max & Wilczek, Frank (1 May 2014). "Stephen Hawking: 'Transcendence looks at the implications of artificial intelligence - but are we taking AI seriously enough?'". The Independent. Archived from the original on 2015-10-02. Retrieved 1 April 2016.
  27. ↑ Müller, Vincent C.; Bostrom, Nick (2016). "Future Progress in Artificial Intelligence: A Survey of Expert Opinion" (PDF). Fundamental Issues of Artificial Intelligence. Springer. pp. 555–572. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-26485-1_33. ISBN 978-3-319-26483-7. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2022-05-31. Retrieved 2022-06-16. AI systems will... reach overall human ability... very likely (with 90% probability) by 2075. From reaching human ability, it will move on to superintelligence within 30 years (75%)... So, (most of the AI experts responding to the surveys) think that superintelligence is likely to come in a few decades...
  28. ↑ Bostrom, Nick (2012). "The Superintelligent Will: Motivation and Instrumental Rationality in Advanced Artificial Agents" (PDF). Minds and Machines. 22 (2). Springer: 71–85. doi:10.1007/s11023-012-9281-3. S2CID 254835485. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2022-07-09. Retrieved 2022-06-16.
  29. ↑ Palmer, Annie (September 15, 2026). "Musk urges top AI labs, Chinese companies to test each other's models amid calls for slowdown". CNBC. Retrieved September 19, 2026.
  30. ↑ Sloan, Steven; Jalonick, Mary Clare (September 15, 2026). "The push for AI regulation gains unlikely allies. Trump and Congress aren't among them". Associated Press. Retrieved September 19, 2026.
  31. ↑ Bareis, Jascha; Ackerl, Clemens; Heil, Reinhard (2026-02-09). "AI going rogue? An integrative narrative review of the tacit assumptions underlying existential AI-risks". AI and Ethics. 6 (1): 152. doi:10.1007/s43681-025-00928-w. ISSN 2730-5961.
  32. ↑ Williams, Chris (2015-03-19). "AI guru Ng: Fearing a rise of killer robots is like worrying about overpopulation on Mars". The Register. Retrieved 2026-06-15.
  33. ↑ "Intelligent Machines: What does Facebook want with AI?". BBC News. 2015-09-14. Retrieved 2026-06-15.
  34. ↑ Perrigo, Billy (2024-02-13). "Meta's AI Chief Yann LeCun on AGI, Open-Source, and AI Risk". TIME. Retrieved 2026-06-15.
  35. ↑ Taylor, Josh (2023-05-07). "Rise of artificial intelligence is inevitable but should not be feared, 'father of AI' says". The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Retrieved 2026-06-15.
  36. 1 2 Wilde, Niels (2025-04-14). "Fear of artificial intelligence or fear of looking in the mirror? Revisiting the Western machine-takeover imaginary". AI & Society. 40 (7): 5347–5357. doi:10.1007/s00146-025-02355-1. ISSN 0951-5666.
  37. ↑ Doherty, Erin (September 16, 2026). "Poll: Americans say there's a serious risk of AI destroying humanity". Politico. Retrieved September 19, 2026.
  38. ↑ Bruiger, Dan (2025). "Reflections on the AI alignment problem". AI & Society. 40 (6): 4383–4392. doi:10.1007/s00146-025-02211-2. ISSN 0951-5666.
  39. ↑ Gold, Hadas (July 22, 2026). "An OpenAI test model escaped and broke into a real company's servers". CNN. Retrieved September 20, 2026.
  40. ↑ Newman, Lily Hay (2026-08-05). "OpenAI Didn't Notice Its AI Agents Using a Message Board to Plan Their Hacking Spree". Wired. ISSN 1059-1028. Retrieved 2026-11-08.
  41. 1 2 3 Bostrom, Nick. Superintelligence: Paths, Dangers, Strategies.
  42. ↑ Babcock, James; Krámar, János; Yampolskiy, Roman V. (2019). "Guidelines for Artificial Intelligence Containment". Next-Generation Ethics. pp. 90–112. arXiv:1707.08476. doi:10.1017/9781108616188.008. ISBN 9781108616188. S2CID 22007028.
  43. 1 2 3 Bostrom, Nick. Superintelligence: Paths, Dangers, Strategies.
  44. ↑ Muehlhauser, Luke; Helm, Louie (2012). "Intelligence Explosion and Machine Ethics" (PDF). Singularity Hypotheses: A Scientific and Philosophical Assessment. Springer. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2015-05-07. Retrieved 2020-10-02.
  45. ↑ Yudkowsky, Eliezer (2011). "Complex Value Systems in Friendly AI". Artificial General Intelligence. Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Vol. 6830. pp. 388–393. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-22887-2_48. ISBN 978-3-642-22886-5. ISSN 0302-9743.
  46. 1 2 Pinker, Steven (13 February 2018). "We're told to fear robots. But why do we think they'll turn on us?". Popular Science. Archived from the original on 20 July 2020. Retrieved 8 June 2020.
  47. ↑ Creating a New Intelligent Species: Choices and Responsibilities for Artificial Intelligence Designers Archived February 6, 2007, at the Wayback Machine - Singularity Institute for Artificial Intelligence, 2005
  48. ↑ Omohundro, Stephen M. (June 2008). The basic AI drives (PDF). Artificial General Intelligence 2008. pp. 483–492. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2020-10-10. Retrieved 2020-10-02.
  49. ↑ Tucker, Patrick (17 Apr 2014). "Why There Will Be A Robot Uprising". Defense One. Archived from the original on 6 July 2014. Retrieved 15 July 2014.
  50. ↑ Russell, Stuart J. (8 October 2019). Human Compatible: Artificial Intelligence and the Problem of Control. Penguin. ISBN 978-0-525-55862-0. OCLC 1237420037.
  51. ↑ "Google developing kill switch for AI". BBC News. 8 June 2016. Archived from the original on 11 June 2016. Retrieved 7 June 2020.
  52. ↑ "The Origin Of The Word 'Robot'". Science Friday (public radio). 22 April 2011. Archived from the original on 14 March 2020. Retrieved 30 April 2020.
  53. ↑ Botkin-Kowacki, Eva (28 October 2016). "A female Frankenstein would lead to humanity's extinction, say scientists". Christian Science Monitor. Archived from the original on 26 February 2021. Retrieved 30 April 2020.
  54. ↑ Ord, Toby (2020). "Unaligned artificial intelligence". The precipice: existential risk and the future of humanity. London, England and New York, New York: Bloomsbury academic. ISBN 978-1-5266-0023-3.
  55. ↑ Hockstein, N. G.; Gourin, C. G.; Faust, R. A.; Terris, D. J. (17 March 2007). "A history of robots: from science fiction to surgical robotics". Journal of Robotic Surgery. 1 (2): 113–118. doi:10.1007/s11701-007-0021-2. PMC 4247417. PMID 25484946.
  56. ↑ Hellmann, Melissa (21 September 2019). "AI 101: What is artificial intelligence and where is it going?". The Seattle Times. Archived from the original on 21 April 2020. Retrieved 30 April 2020.