Chang's principal research interests lie in normative ethics, metaethics, action theory and moral psychology. Her work focuses on practical conflict, the nature of reasons and values and their relations, and rational agency. She is known for arguing that the normative and evaluative realm, like space and time, is not structured as is commonly assumed. In particular, she is known for arguing that two items which are neither better nor worse than one another and yet not equally good may nevertheless be comparable: they may be 'on a par'. If correct, her view has wide-ranging implications for axiology, normative theory, decision theory, economic choice theory, and rationality. Her work also develops a view of rational agency, 'hybrid voluntarism', according to which rational agents are not merely discoverers of reasons but creators of them through the activity of commitment. She has also written on value pluralism and social choice. She has given various public lectures on decision-making, love, and commitment.
Chang is the author of Making Comparisons Count and the editor of the first volume on the topic of incommensurability of values in the Anglo-American world, Incommensurability, Incomparability, and Practical Reason, and has authored articles and book chapters.
Ruth Chang is also widely known for her work on 'hard choices' and decision-making, and her research has been the subject of radio, newspaper, and magazine articles.
Selected works
Incommensurability, Incomparability, and Practical Reason, editor (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1997) ISBN978-0674447561
"Voluntarist Reasons and the Sources of Normativity", in Sobel and Wall, eds., Reasons for Action (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2009), pp.243–71.
"Commitments, Reasons, and the Will", in Shafer-Landau, ed., Oxford Studies in Metaethics, vol. 8 (2013), pp.74–113.
"Hard Choices", Journal of the American Philosophical Association 3 (2017), pp.1–21. doi:10.1017/apa.2017.7
"Do We Have Normative Powers?", Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 94 (2020), pp.275–300. doi:10.1093/arisup/akaa012
The Routledge Handbook of Practical Reason, co-editor with Kurt Sylvan (London: Routledge, 2021). doi:10.4324/9780429266768
"How to Avoid the Repugnant Conclusion", in McMahan et al., eds., Ethics and Existence: The Legacy of Derek Parfit (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2022), pp.389–429. doi:10.1093/oso/9780192894250.003.0015
"Three Dogmas of Normativity", Journal of Applied Philosophy 40 (2023), pp.173–204. doi:10.1111/japp.12626
Conversations in Philosophy, Law, and Politics, co-editor with Amia Srinivasan (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2024). ISBN978-0198864523
Research Handbook on Legal Argumentation, co-editor with Luís Duarte d'Almeida, Lilian Bermejo-Luque, Euan MacDonald, and Fabio Shecaira (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2025). doi:10.4337/9781803925431
12Hsieh, Nien-hê. "Incommensurable Values". Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Stanford. Archived from the original on 17 January 2013. Retrieved 16 January 2013.
↑Schroeder, Mark. "Value Theory". Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Stanford. Archived from the original on 17 January 2013. Retrieved 16 January 2013.