Shaka era

Today
(at UTC+00)
Thursday, 29 October 2026
HinduRohiṇi・Varīyas
Solar: 12 Kārtika, 1948 SE
Lunisolar: Caturthī, Kṛishna pakṣa of Āśvina, 2083 VE
Rāudra・5127 KY・1,872,877
Other calendars
AkanKuruyaw
Armenian11 Trē 1476
AztecAtlcahualo 7, 7 Xōchitl
Babylonian16 Tashritu, 2337 SE
Balinese pawukonMenga, Pasah, Laba, Wage, Paniron, Wraspati of Watugunung, Brahma, Urungan, Suka
Bengali13 Kartik, BS 1433
ChineseYang Fire Rat・Legs Mansion
Fire Horse Year, Month 9, Day 20
(Shuangjiang, 9 days until Lidong)
Common Era29 October 2026 CE
Coptic19 Paopi, AM 1743
Egyptian16 Phamenoth, 2775 NE
Ethiopian19 Ṭeqemt, 2019 Amätä Məhrät
French RepublicanDécade I, Septidi de Brumaire de l'Année 235 de la République
Gregorian29 October, AD 2026
Hebrew18 Cheshvan, AM 5787
IcelandicFimmtudagur, 6 Gormánuður 2026
Islamic17 Jumada al-awwal, AH 1448
(using tabular method)
ISO week date2026-W44-4
Japanese19 Nagatsuki, Reiwa 8
(Sōkō, 9 days until Rittō)
Julian16 October, AD 2026 (AM 7535)
Julian day2461343
Korean19 Gaedal, 4359 DE
Maya13.0.14.1.0
13 Zac, 7 Ahau
Romanante diem XVII Kalendas Novembres, MMDCCLXXIX AUC
Solar Hijri7 Aban, SH 1405
Tibetan19 tha skar, me pho rta
2153 or 1772 or 1000

[refresh]
Coin of Western Satrap ruler Damasena. The minting date, here 153 (100-50-3 in Brahmi script numerals) of the Saka era, therefore 231 CE, clearly appears behind the head of the king.

The Shaka era (IAST: Śaka, Śāka) also known as Shali Vahana (S.V) is a historical Hindu calendar era. It is referred as the Shalivahana Era or Śālivāhana. The Shaka era uses expired, elapsed, or complete years, where a year must have elapsed before it can be counted. This is similar to the Western method of determining a person's age, whose first year must have been completed before that person reaches one year old. The epoch (its year zero) of which corresponds to 78 CE. The era has been widely used in different regions of the Indian subcontinent as well as in Southeast Asia.

History

Mohar of Gorkhali king Prithvi Narayan Shah dated Shaka era 1685 (AD 1763)

The origin of the Shaka era is highly controversial.: 182–184  There are two Shaka era systems in scholarly use, one is called Old Shaka Era, whose epoch is uncertain, probably sometime in the 1st millennium BCE because ancient Buddhist and Jaina inscriptions and texts use it, but this is a subject of dispute among scholars. The uncounted first year of the era is numbered as year zero.

By comparing eclipses mentioned in inscriptions, Vedveer Arya (researcher of Indian history and MA in Sanskrit) has argued that the Old Shaka Era began with the beginning of the reign of the first Shaka king and that it began in 582 BC.

The other is called Shaka Era of 78 CE, or simply Shaka Era, a system that is common in epigraphic evidence from southern India. A parallel northern India system is the Vikrama Era, which is used by the Vikrami calendar linked to Vikramaditya.: 181–183 

The beginning of the Shaka era is now widely equated to the ascension of Indo-Scythian king Chashtana in 78 CE. His inscriptions, dated to the years 11 and 52, have been found at Andhau in Kutch region. These years are interpreted as Shaka years 11 (89 CE) and 52 (130 CE).A previously more common view was that the beginning of the Shaka era corresponds to the ascension of Kanishka I in 78 CE.: 182–184  However, the latest research by Henry Falk indicated that Kanishka ascended the throne in 127 CE. Moreover, Kanishka was not a Shaka, but a Kushana ruler. Other historical candidates have included rulers such as Vima Kadphises, Vonones, and Nahapana.

According to historian Dineshchandra Sircar, the historically inaccurate notion of "Shalivahana era" appears to be based on the victory of the Satavahana ruler Gautamiputra Satakarni over some Shaka (Western Kshatrapa) kings. Sircar also suggested that the association of the northern king Vikramaditya with Vikrama era might have led the southern scholars to fabricate a similar legend.grandson of legendary emperor Vikramaditya defeated the Shakas in 78 CE, and the Shaka era marks the day of this conquest. This legend has been mentioned in the writings of Brahmagupta (7th century CE), Al-Biruni (973–1048 CE), and others. However it is an obvious fabrication.: 182–184  Over time, the word "Shaka" became generic, and came to be mean "an era"; the era thus came to be known as "Shalivahana Shaka".

Usage

The earliest known users of the era are the Western Satraps, the Shaka (Indo-Scythian) rulers of Ujjain. From the reign of Rudrasimha I (178–197), they recorded the date of minting of their coins in the Shaka era, usually written on the obverse behind the king's head in Brahmi numerals.

The use of the calendar era survived into the Gupta period and became part of Hindu tradition following the decline of Buddhism in the Indian subcontinent. It was in widespread use by the 6th to 7th centuries, e.g. in the works of Varāhamihira and Brahmagupta, and by the 7th century also appears in epigraphy in Hindu Southeast Asia.[citation needed]

The calendar era remained in use in India and Southeast Asia throughout the medieval period, the main alternative era in traditional Hindu timekeeping being the Vikram Samvat era (56 BC). It was used by Javanese courts until 1633, when it was replaced by Anno Javanico, a hybrid Javanese-Islamic system. It continues to be used in the Balinese saka calendar. It was adopted as the era of the Indian national calendar (also known as "Śaka calendar") in 1957.[citation needed]

The Shaka epoch is the vernal equinox of the year AD 78. The year of the official Shaka Calendar is tied to the Gregorian date of 22 March every year, except in Gregorian leap years when it starts on 21 March. The Lunisolar Shalivaahana Saka continues to be used widely in Southern and Western India for many religious and some secular purposes such as sowing and agriculture. [citation needed]

See also

References

  1. 1 2 3 4 Richard Salomon (1998). Indian Epigraphy: A Guide to the Study of Inscriptions in Sanskrit, Prakrit, and the other Indo-Aryan Languages. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-535666-3.
  2. 1 2 Government of India (1955). "Report of the Calendar Reform Committee". New Delhi: Council of Scientific and Industrial Research. pp. 255–256.
  3. ↑ Arya, Vedveer (30 September 2016). "The Epoch of Śaka Era: A critical study". IndiaFacts. Comparison with the NASA list of eclipses that the author refers to shows that all BC dates in this article are out by one year (possibly due to the author misreading dates given in astronomical year numbering in the list), with 582 BC being given as 583 BC and so on.
  4. ↑ Adalbert J. Gail; Gerd J. R. Mevissen; Richard Salomon, eds. (2006). Script and Image: Papers on Art and Epigraphy. Motilal Banarsidass. p. 193. ISBN 9788120829442.
  5. ↑ Shailendra Bhandare (2006). "Numismatics and History: The Maurya-Gupta interlude in the Gangetic Plains". In Patrick Olivelle (ed.). Between the Empires : Society in India 300 BCE to 400 CE: Society in India 300 BCE to 400 CE. Oxford University Press. p. 69. ISBN 9780199775071.
  6. ↑ Ladislav Stančo (2012). Greek Gods in the East. Karolinum Press. p. 18. ISBN 9788024620459.
  7. 1 2 Krishna Chandra Sagar (1992). Foreign Influence on Ancient India. Northern Book Centre. pp. 135–136. ISBN 9788172110284.
  8. ↑ kamlesh kapur (2010). History of Ancient India. Sterling Publishers Pvt Ltd. p. 321. ISBN 978-81-207-5212-2.
  9. ↑ RajendraSingh Kushwaha (2003). Glimpses of Bhartiya History. Ocean books. p. 184. ISBN 9788188322404.
  10. ↑ D. C. Sircar (1965). Indian Epigraphy. Motilal Banarsidass. pp. 262–266. ISBN 9788120811669.
  11. ↑ P. V. Jagadisa Ayyar (1982). South Indian Shrines: Illustrated. Asian Educational Services. pp. 80–81. ISBN 978-81-206-0151-2.
  12. ↑ Rapson, "A Catalogue of Indian coins in the British Museum. Andhras etc." p. CCVIII
  13. ↑ Ricklefs, Merle Calvin (1993). A history of modern Indonesia since c. 1300 (2nd ed.). Stanford University Press and Macmillans. pp. 5 and 46. ISBN 9780804721950.