Sarmizegetusa Regia

Sarmizegetusa Regia
Dacian capital, Sarmisegetusa, Sarmizegethusa, Sarmisegethusa, Sarmisegethuza, Sarmageze, Sarmategte, Sermizegetusa, Zarmizegethusa, Zarmizegethousa, Zarmizegetusa, Zermizegethouse
Ruins of Dacian temples
Sarmizegetusa Regia is located in Romania
Sarmizegetusa Regia
Location within Romania
45°37′19″N 23°18′33″E / 45.6219°N 23.3093°E / 45.6219; 23.3093
LocationGrădiștea de Munte, Hunedoara County, Romania
History
Abandoned2nd century AD
Event(s)Trajan's Dacian Wars, Battle of Sarmizegetusa
Site notes
Elevation1,030 m (3,380 ft)
Archaeologists
ConditionPartially reconstructed
Reference no.HD-I-s-A-03190
Part ofDacian Fortresses of the Orăștie Mountains
CriteriaCultural: (ii), (iii), (iv)
Reference906
Inscription1999 (23rd Session)

Sarmizegetusa Regia (also known as Sarmisegetusa, Sarmisegethusa, Sarmisegethuza; Ancient Greek: Ζαρμιζεγεθούσα, romanized: Zarmizegethoúsa) was the capital and the most important military, religious and political centre of the Dacians before the wars with the Roman Empire. Built on top of a 1200 m high mountain, the fortress, consisting of six citadels, was the core of a strategic and defensive system in the Orăștie Mountains (in present-day Romania). The archaeological site of Sarmizegetusa Regia is located in the village of Grădiștea de Munte in Hunedoara County.

Sarmizegetusa Regia should not be confused with Ulpia Traiana Sarmizegetusa, the Roman capital of Dacia built by Roman Emperor Trajan some 40 km away, which was not the Dacian capital. Sarmizegetusa Ulpia was discovered earlier, was known already in the early 1900s, and was initially mistaken for the Dacian capital, a confusion which led to incorrect conclusions being made regarding the military history and organization of the Dacians.

Name

Variants

Zarmizegethusa Regia on Dacia's map from a medieval book made after Ptolemy's Geographia (ca. 140 AD).

Historical records show considerable variation in the spelling of the name of the Dacian capital:

Etymology

The pronunciation in the Dacian language is not known for certain, nor is the meaning of the word. Several hypotheses have been advanced to explain the origin of the name Sarmizegetusa. The most important of these ascribe the following possible meanings to the city's name:

Layout

Map of the site

Sarmizegetusa Regia contained a citadel, the largest of the Dacian fortifications, and residential areas with dwellings and workshops as well as a sacred zone.

The archaeological inventory found at the site demonstrates that Dacian society had a relatively high standard of living.

The citadel wall was 3 m thick and about 4 – 5 m high at the time of its completion. Because the wall, which encloses an area of about 3 ha, is built to follow the edges of the height, the citadel has a more unusual configuration, that of a hexagon with unequal sides. Nearby, to the west, there is an extensive civil settlement covering an area of 3 km, where many dwellings, workshops, warehouses, barns, and water reservoirs can be observed. 100 meters to the east, right at the citadel gate on the same cardinal point, are the sanctuaries, which have varied shapes and sizes. The sanctuaries were located on a terrace, which had been connected to the aforementioned gate by a paved road. It is not known whether there were seven or eight quadrilateral sanctuaries, as they were destroyed by the Romans during hostilities and it cannot be determined whether it was a single large sanctuary or two smaller ones built very close together. There are only two circular sanctuaries.

History

Pre-Roman era

Towards the end of his reign, Burebista transferred the Geto-Dacian capital from Argedava to Sarmizegetusa. Serving as the Dacian capital for at least one and a half centuries, Sarmizegethusa reached its zenith under King Decebal. Archaeological findings suggest that the Dacian god Zalmoxis and his chief priest had an important role in Dacian society at this time. They have also shed new light on the political, economic and scientific development of the Dacians and their successful assimilation of technical and scientific knowledge from the Greek and Romans.

The site has yielded two especially notable finds:

Roman Dacia and Moesia Inferior.

The smithies north of the sanctuary also provide evidence of the Dacians' skill in metalworking: findings include tools such as metre-long tongs, hammers and anvils which were used to make some 400 metallic artefacts — scythes, sickles, hoes, rakes, picks, pruning hooks, knives, plowshares, and carpenters' tools — as well as weapons such as daggers, curved Dacian scimitars, spearpoints, and shields.

The capital of Dacia reached its peak under Decebalus, the Dacian king defeated by the Roman Empire during the reign of Emperor Trajan.

The defensive system

The Dacian capital’s defensive system includes six Dacian fortresses — Sarmizegetusa, Costești-Blidaru, Piatra Roșie, Costești-Cetățuie, Căpâlna and Bănița. All six have been named UNESCO World heritage sites.

Roman era

After the defeat of the Dacians, the conquerors established a military garrison there and began to tear down the citadel. Sarmizegetusa's walls were partly dismantled at the end of the First Dacian War in AD 102, when Dacia was invaded by the Emperor Trajan of the Roman Empire and rebuilt as Roman fortifications. The latter were subsequently destroyed, possibly by the Dacians, and then rebuilt again following the successful siege of the site in AD 105–6.

Later, the Romans built a new capital, Colonia Ulpia Traiana Augusta Dacica Sarmizegetusa, at a distance of 40 km from Sarmizegetusa Regia. Emperor Hadrian wanted the new capital built by Trajan to be perceived as a successor to the Dacian one, which is why he added the name Sarmizegetusa to it. Today, the village of Sarmizegetusa, Hunedoara is located on the site of Ulpia Traiana Sarmizegetusa.

Present

In 2011, employees of a company destroyed a part of the Dacian site to build a 3,000-square-meter parking lot, putting the citadel wall in danger of collapse over a length of approximately 30 meters. The construction of the parking lot was paid for by the Hunedoara County Council, intended for tourists visiting the site, and was done without the approval or supervision of archaeologists.

Because of archaeological poaching and vandalism, the site is currently under 24/7 surveillance.

See also

Notes

  1. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Dana, Dan; Nemeti, Sorin (2014-01-09). "Ptolémée et la toponymie de la Dacie (II-V)". Classica et Christiana. p. 18. Retrieved 2014-03-30.
  2. ↑ "National Register of Historic Monuments in Romania, Hunedoara County" (PDF). www.inmi.ro. Archived from the original (PDF) on 27 February 2012. Retrieved 18 October 2012.
  3. ↑ Schmitz (2005) 3
  4. ↑ Ptolemy's maps of northern Europe: a reconstruction of the prototypes, Gudmund Schütte, H. Hagerup, 1917
  5. ↑ Russu 1944, pp. 376–399.
  6. ↑ Russu, Ioan I. (1959). "ch. 5". Limba traco-dacilor [The Thracian-Dacian Language] (2nd revised edition, Bucharest, 1967 ed.). Bucharest.
  7. ↑ Daicoviciu, Constantin; Daicoviciu, Hadrian (1966). Ulpia Traiana. p. 10.
  8. ↑ Mărghitan, Liviu (1981). Civilizația geto-dacilor [The Geto-Dacian Civilization]. p. 19.
  9. ↑ Van Den Gheyn 1885, p. 176.
  10. ↑ Grumeza 2009, p. 87.
  11. ↑ Tomaschek 1883, p. 410.
  12. ↑ Rosetti, Al. (1930). Resturi de limbă scito-sarmată [Remnants of Scytho-Sarmatian Language]. Iași.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link)
  13. ↑ Pârvan, Vasile (1982). "V". Getica, o protoistorie a Daciei [Getica, a Protohistory of Dacia] (2nd ed.). Bucharest.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link)
  14. ↑ Tomaschek, W. (1894). "Die alten Thraker" [The Ancient Thracians]. Sitzungsberichte der Wiener Akademie der Wissenschaften, Phil.-hist. Klasse.
  15. ↑ Detschew, Dimiter (1952). Charakteristik der thrakischen Sprache [Characteristics of the Thracian Language]. Berlin and Sofia.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link)
  16. ↑ Oltean, I. A.; Fonte, J. (2019-11-27). "Microtopographies of Dacian upland settlement strategies and community aggregation trends in the Orăştie Mountains, Romania". In Cowley, Dave C.; Fernández-Götz, Manuel; Romankiewicz, Tanja; Wendling, Holger (eds.). Rural Settlement. Relating buildings, landscape, and people in the European Iron Age. Sidestone Press. ISBN 978-90-8890-818-7.
  17. 1 2 Ruggles 2005, p. 370.
  18. ↑ MacKendrick 1975, pp. 60–61.
  19. ↑ MacKendrick 1975, p. 48.
  20. ↑ Goodman & Sherwood 2002, p. 227.
  21. ↑ Matyszak 2009, p. 222.
  22. 1 2 MacKendrick 1975, p. 65.
  23. 1 2 MacKendrick 1975, p. 66.
  24. ↑ Oltean, I. A.; Hanson, W. S. (2017). "Conquest strategy and political discourse: new evidence for the conquest of Dacia from LiDAR analysis at Sarmizegetusa Regia". Journal of Roman Archaeology. 30: 429–446. doi:10.1017/S1047759400074195. ISSN 1047-7594. S2CID 158784696.
  25. ↑ "Cu buldozerele în Sarmizegetusa (With the Bulldozers in Sarmizegetusa)". România Liberă. July 11, 2011. Archived from the original on January 15, 2021. Retrieved 2024-01-01.
  26. ↑ Vitalie Bârcă (2020). "Accomplishments and failures in the management of fortress Sarmizegetusa Regia, a UNESCO World Heritage Monument". Journal of Ancient History and Archaeology. 6 (4): 115–150. doi:10.14795/j.v6i4.464. Retrieved 5 December 2025.

References

Plans, surveys

3D reconstructions

Virtual Tour