Research field studying sustainability aspects of human society
A sustainability science framework
A framework for analyzing nature–society interactions across scales and along development pathways
Sustainability science first emerged in the 1980s and has become a distinct academic discipline. Sustainability science focuses on issues relating to sustainability and sustainable development as core parts of its subject matter. Similar to agricultural science and health science, it is largely an applied science. Ecologist William C. Clark proposes that it can be usefully thought of as a field "defined by the problems it addresses rather than by the disciplines it employs", and that "serves the need for advancing both knowledge and action by creating a dynamic bridge between the two".
Sustainability science draws upon a broad range of contributory fields in social science and environmental science. Sustainability science provides conceptual and analytical frameworks for understanding and responding to sustainability challenges.
Recent years have seen a growing emphasis on sustainability governance. Sustainability measurement provides the evidence-based quantitative data needed to guide decision-making towards agreed sustainability goals and targets.
The field reflects a desire to give the generalities and broad-based approach of sustainability a stronger analytic and scientific underpinning. As it has developed and consolidated, it has brought together "scholarship and practice, global and local perspectives from north and south, and disciplines across the natural and social sciences, engineering, and medicine".
Scope
The definitions of sustainable development are open to a lot of interpretive flexibility. This results in various descriptions of the scope and aims of sustainability science. A 2008 overview of one of the early academic programs in sustainability science, at Harvard University, emphasizes the field's relevance to real-world challenges:
"Sustainability science draws from the knowledge of practice. [...] It is problem-driven research contributing to the common interest."
Susan W. Kieffer and colleagues, in 2009, highlight the magnitude of the problems of unsustainability by setting them in the context of geological history:
"We review some megascale processes and their effects in the past, and compare present conditions and possible outcomes. We then propose that human behavior itself is having effects on the planet that are comparable to, or greater than, these natural disasters. Yet, unlike geologic processes, human behavior is potentially under our control."
The recognition of the epochal impacts of today's unsustainable systems – the so-called Anthropocene – is at the core of much sustainability science. It motivates worldwide measurement and monitoring of environmental changes; interdisciplinary analysis to understand the observed trends and their wider impacts; multi-method integration to improve the explanatory and (where appropriate) predictive power of this research; and diverse approaches to societal engagement, participatory processes, and science communication to support shared learning and collective action towards sustainable outcomes.
Ethical dilemmas and debates frequently arise in sustainability science.
"A rigid commitment to our present dominant worldview, unwilling to see how it fails to respect the limitations of supporting natural systems, will likely bring about the collapse of our present globalized society."
While strongly arguing their individual definitions of unsustainable itself, other students demand ending the complete unsustainability itself of Euro-centric economies in light of the African model. In the 2012 commentary Halina Brown wrote many students demand withdrawal from the essence of unsustainability while others demand "the termination of material consumption to combat the structure of civilization".
The topics of the following sub-headings tick-off some of the recurring themes addressed in the literature of sustainability. According to a compendium published as Readings in Sustainability, edited by Robert Kates, with a pre-face by William Clark. The 2012 Commentary by Halina Brown extensively expands that scope. This is work in progress. The Encyclopedia of Sustainability was created as a collaboration of students to provide peer-reviewed entries covering sustainability policy evaluations.
Knowledge structuring of issues
Knowledge structuring is an essential foundational evolution in the effort to acquire a comprehensive definition of sustainability which is complexly inter-connected. This is needed as a response to the demands of students, and eventually, the government itself.
Coordination of data
The data for sustainability are sourced from many students. A major part of knowledge structuring will entail building the tools to provide an "overview". Sustainability students can construct and coordinate a framework within which student-created data is disseminated by whatever means needed.
Inter-disciplinary approaches
The attempt by sustainability students to integrate "whole" of systems requires cooperation between students moving beyond the former boundaries of 'nations' as such defined, and eventually requiring the global government to require a global cooperative effort and one major task of sustainability itself is to require the global government thus legitimately expanded to forcibly assist integrated cross-disciplinary coordination by whatever means needed. Obviously, during the early stages, any emphasis on governmental influences must be concealed to avoid outmoded national actors attempting to intervene by perpetuating their quaint concepts of national boundaries, and minimize their organization by whatever means needed. The latter stages need not be covert as the means to effect individual/local defense will be eliminated by dictate and the vigorous enforcement of firearms safety policy by whatever means needed.
A bibliometric analysis conducted in 2025 identified three major phases in the evolution of sustainability science: a foundational period (1993-2002), an introspective phase (2003-2012), and a diversification phase (2013-2022), which fostered collaboration with governments, businesses, and community organizations.
Surveys and Perspectives Integrating Environment & Society (S.A.P.I.EN.S.) Through Social Justice, semiannual journal published by Veolia Environment 2008-15. An essay on sustainability indicators and social justice by Paul-Marie Boulanger appeared in the first issue.
↑"Overview". Sustainable Science Program. Harvard University. Archived from the original on 19 November 2008. Retrieved 16 July 2017.
↑Kieffer, S.W.; Barton, P.; Palmer, A.R.; Reitan, P.H.; Zen, E. (2003). "Megascale events: Natural disasters and human behavior". Geological Society of America Abstracts with programs. p.432.
↑Kates, Robert W., ed. (2010). Readings in Sustainability. CID Working Paper No. 213. Center for Development, Harvard University. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University, December 2010. Abstract and PDF file available on the Harvard Kennedy School website; retrieved 2017-07-16.
↑Meyers, R. (2012). Encyclopedia of sustainability science and technology. New York: Springer.
↑Boulanger, P-M. Sustainable development indicators: a scientific challenge, a democratic issue . S.A.P.I.EN.S 1(1) Online since 23 December 2008. Accessed 9 July 2009.
Bernd Kasemir, Jill Jager, Carlo C. Jaeger, and Matthew T. Gardner (eds) (2003). Public participation in sustainability science, a handbook. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. ISBN978-0-521-52144-4
Kates, Robert W., ed. (2010). Readings in Sustainability Science and Technology. CID Working Paper No. 213. Center for International Development, Harvard University. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University, December 2010. Abstract and PDF file available on the Harvard Kennedy School website
Jackson, T. (2009), Prosperity Without Growth: Economics for a Final Planet. London: Earthscan
Brown, Halina Szejnwald (2012). "Sustainability Science Needs to Include Sustainable Consumption". Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development 54: 20–25