The Tonasa Formation is a geological formation that is located in Sulawesi, Indonesia. It is one of most widespread carbonate rock formation and also one of the most beautiful karst topography in South Sulawesi. It cover several regencies such as Maros, Pangkep, Barru, and Jeneponto. Based on the sediment and foraminifera remains (Discoaster, Sphenolithus, etc.), most researchers regard Tonasa Formation as a shallow ocean habitat that come from late Eocene to Miocene age rock. The presence of echinoids, coralline, and alveolonids fossils also support this idea.
Regarding fossils, the formation mainly known for its collection of marine fish fossils. Most of the fossils discoveries were made in Maros district specifically Patanuang Asu Village. As mentioned before, the biota found here are mostly shallow coral reel resident. L. F. de Beaufort, who was among the first to studied the fossils extensively during 1920s, reported various taxa both from extant and extinct genera. Some of them yield numerous specimens (more than 50) and preserved beautifully. Unfortunately, many of them are poorly studied and haven't restudied hence still having outdated taxa name.
| Genus | Species | Material | Notes | Images |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Balistes | B. sp. | Almost complete body fossils measuring 2 cm long. | Dorsal spine taking almost 1/4 of body length and seems to have a rounded caudal fin | |
| Brouweria | B. robusta | Partial head and body fossils | Genus of elopid that are said to have large body size. | |
| B. striata | ||||
| Caranx | C. baltruschi | Partial rear body fossils | Two species of carangid that have well developed lateral plates. | |
| C. femeri | ||||
| Chelmon | C. fossilis | Partial anterior part of the body including skull | Seems to have a lower body profile that living species. The original description wrote the genus as "Chelmos" | |
| Clupea | C. brouweri | Numerous specimens; 55 specimens are known that preserved most of the body except the head | The fish average length is 15 cm and seems to lived in large number not unlike modern species | |
| Cybium | C. intermedium | Several specimens that preserved the head up to first dorsal fin partially | The fish is said to be an intermediate form between "Cybium" (Scomberomorus) and Scomber hence the intermedium name | |
| Holocentrus | H. sp. | Single specimen that is preserved poorly only showing opercular bones, spine, some scales, and anal spine | The third anal spine is very long even compared to modern species while the opercular spines are wide; the original paper wrote the genus as "Holocentrum" | |
| Lutjanus | L. sp. | Single specimen consist of rear portion of the fish that preserved the caudal fin beautifully | Beaufort said that the fish have more fin rays than most species he compared except Lutjanus sebae | |
| Marosichthys | M. huismani | Single specimen consist the head and some of its dorsal fin spines | Reexamination suggest that this species closest extant relatives come from Naso genera | |
| Mastygocercus | M. vermiformis | Single specimen consist of the rear portion of the fish | The fossil show that Mastygocercus have a whip-like tail that devoid of caudal fin rays | |
| Protohimantura | P. vorstmani | Single specimen consist of anterior part of the fish | Originally described as Trygon vorstmani | |
| Sphyraena | S. crassidens | Several specimens are known from Tonasa Formation and also Java | It have proportionally large eyes compared to other species | |
There are several specimens that Beaufort did not give specific genera or species: