Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alin Suciu

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) DavidLeighEllis (talk) 02:31, 7 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Alin Suciu

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No independent sources attest notability or indicate this individual may pass WP:PROF. What we have right now is the following: directory entry, directory entry, page that doesn't even mention the subject, likewise, search result. That simply isn't enough. - Biruitorul ^Talk 01:27, 31 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. — JJMC89 (T·C) 05:35, 31 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Romania-related deletion discussions. — JJMC89 (T·C) 05:35, 31 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep. Appears to be a distinguished gnostic scholar [1]. Cites are generally very low in theology (and Coptic theology a fortiori) Xxanthippe (talk) 05:49, 31 January 2016 (UTC).[reply]
weak Keep. I would bemore confident about it, except that all of his publications seem to be very minor. DGG ( talk ) 03:59, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep per Xxanthippe. FreeKnowledgeCreator (talk) 20:54, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Passes WP:Prof for reasons very clearly expressed above. Moreover, this is one of a series of Romanian language WP:PRODs which points out a systemic bias. A lot of serious Romanian scholarship is not translated into English. So they are underrepresented in various search engines. in fact, the change in lettering and names creates a GIGO conundrum for searchers, even though they may be diligent and seemingly thorough. Finally, this motion fails because of WP:Before. 7&6=thirteen (☎) 02:15, 7 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.