| This page contains material that is considered humorous. Such material is not meant to be taken seriously. |
Bad Jokes and Other Non Deleted Nonsense is the stuff that doesn't get to be at WP:BJAODN because it was not deleted.
From Bracket:
Parentheses may be nested (generally with one set (such as this) inside another set). This is not commonly used in formal writing (though sometimes other brackets [especially square brackets] will be used for one or more inner set of parentheses [in other words, secondary {or even tertiary} phrases can be found within the main parenthetical sentence]).
This comment here led to being "blocked indefinitely from editing for using IPs to evade topic ban" and a SPI investigation. The intent was to be a humorous response to preceding IP comments, nothing more. - 71.40.3.92 (talk) 03:35, 10 August 2014 (UTC)
Extremely long edit war over the title of a section of the 2019 April Fools' Page. It's not going to be documented here, considering the fact that there is a page with a size of 15,992 bytes that already documents the entire thing. Also, 15,992 bytes is simply too large for a single entry on this page.
From Talk:Ensō
Are there any references for this article?
"Can you hear me Wikipedians? Can you hear me? Yes, it seems I'm getting through *static static* Yes, the Enso is merely the result of me placing my coffee mug on the paper table before I died! Apparently some fool thought that was somehow poignant. Anyways, it's just me trying to tell you all that the Enso is nothing more than a coffee stain! Yes, fear not!"
This is what I would at like if I were a vandal "you all suck die die die die die"
I do not appreciate your vandalism on removing my idol from the wikipedia page 1889. The following revision was removed, although accured and should be kept: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=1889&diff=891540689&oldid=891528716 Next time you dare to remove this you will be reported to the owner of wikipedia. Hes my dad.
Menacingly, Sven R. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 188.1.242.78 (talk) 08:04, 9 April 2019 (UTC)
No vote.,11cookeaw1 (11cookeaw1) 15:40, 27 February 2020 (UTC)
1+3=3
...think about it
there is an article I believe is a hoax (Animaniacs)!
First of all, Big Cocks: great. Lots of Wikipedians are gonna love to see Big Cocks, and want to hear more about Big Cocks. And everyone is gonna love "angry cock energy". I can't speak for everyone, but I know that when I see Big Cocks, I'm immediately interested. Earwig's tool gives a low score of 39.8%, and basically all of that is sourced quotations from the NYT article. I'm a little disappointed in there not being a picture of Big Cocks, although it might be difficult to come up with a freely licensed photo of Big Cocks. Another thing that seemed weird to me is that the whole article is under the "Early Life" section. Huh? I sure hope Big Cocks weren't part of her early life! It could do with a bit more breaking out into sections. There could also be some more cool stuff in the infobox (like what type of art she does, what she's best known for -- there's so much more to her, even though we might only be there for Big Cocks). But I love this article, I love this hook, I love Big Cocks, and I definitely look forward to seeing Big Cocks on the main page.
[editor's note: hummus is a type of food.]
WARNING: ACTIVE ARBITRATION REMEDIES
The contentious topics procedure applies to this article. Parts of this article relate to the Arab–Israeli conflict, which is a contentious topic.
The result was no consensus. Yakka foob mog. Grug pubbawup zink wattoom gazork. Chumble spuzz. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 15:13, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
Delete. No Pussy Galore, no Biggus Dickus--User:Amirak, can you explain this oversight? Drmies (talk) 03:34, 29 June 2022 (UTC)
And Bbb said "What about Breakfast at Tiffany's?"
And I said "I think I remember that film
As I recall, I think we both kinda liked it."
And Bbb said, "Well, that's the one thing we've got."
(And indeffed the user as WP:NOTHERE.) Levivich[block] 02:12, 12 July 2022 (UTC) (non-admin closure)
I feel i'm indebted to wikieditors. i've used wikipedia so much for the last few years, i might as well start editing.

{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. ... discospinster talk 02:08, 14 April 2015 (UTC)A pile of Pontefract cakes |
A Scientologist and a Wikipedian walk into a bar.
The Scientologist says "Boy, what a day. I thought my wife and I were in ARC but her Affinity and gains are downstat now and she's going PTS and can't cognite the Tech. I reported it to the AO so she can get some Ethics in. She's a real Roller Coaster case, though, with a Rock Slam needle during a Sec Check. Totally 1.1. Hope she doesn't get sent to the RPF."
And the Wikipedian says "I hear you. Today my wife had to report an IP account for WP:CIVIL in an AfD, and I had to notify the WP:BLP noticeboard when a single purpose account improperly tagged a stub. He's a real Meatpuppet, maybe even a Sockpuppet, so I may have to file a Checkuser with an Admin. I have some history on my own block log, though, so this may have to go to RfC first."
And the bartender said to them both incredulously, "you guys have wives?"
This page should not be speedily deleted because... (your reason here) --Asad78690 (talk) 07:36, 12 July 2022 (UTC)


The internet is composed almost entirely of eggshells armed with hammers.
course
foot injury

Reproduce by:
Expected results:
Actual results:






You appear to be trying to close an RfC. Would you like some help? Yes, please. Alexa, close this RfC. I'm sorry Dave, I can't do that. Close the RfC, HAL! Pardon me for breathing, which I never do anyway so I don't know why I bother to say it. Here's another one of those depressing RfCs that will take one ten millionth of my brain to close but I just don't see how I can work up the energy to do that. This RfC is flawed and imperfect! Error! Error! Sterilize! Sterilize!
What's all this, then? This close had gotten extremely silly! Stop it at once!
There is clear consensus to use both Clippy and Clippit in the article. The history of how both names came to pass should be covered. This RfC went off in a variety of directions, but the initial question was (paraphrasing) "Should we standardize on one of the two names and use that exclusively?" and to that the answer is clearly, "No".
When I started reading this, I was afraid for a moment that this was about renaming the article. And to that, I say, Warning! Warning! Danger Will Robinson!
An admin, an IP, and a sockpuppet walk into a bar... Randy Kryn (talk) 23:57, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
13:51 26 December 2024 Consarn (talk|contribs) (undid revision 1265386368 by WOOPYCUSHIE (talk) ignoring the fact that exposure to tony fox's mouthnoises caused multiple people to die and get dead, permanently banning him from voice acting work, please find a source first)
| This user has been blocked because a TimeChecker investigation has shown that they have [are going to] abusively used [use] time travel in order to operate one or more user accounts (WP:CLOCKPUPPETS). Information concerning this block has been retroactively removed from the timestream; therefore the Chronosight Team must be consulted before this block can be removed.
Administrators undoing Chronosight blocks without permission from a Chronosighter risk causing a temporal paradox, and will immediately have their administrator rights removed and be pruned as an emergency measure. Issued under the authority of Time Variance Authority Ordinance 802,701 |
83.240.169.14 (talk) 18:39, 18 August 2025 (UTC)
Jack
[editor's note: this page is far too large to be included in full here. click the link and enjoy!]
Between the text
And the citation
Between the report
And the sanction
Falls the Shadow
Between the edit
And the revert
Between the discussion
And the block
Falls the Shadow
Between the request
And the comment
Between the desire
And the admin powers
Between the creation
And the deletion
Falls the Shadow
For Thine is
the Edit is
For Thine is the
hmmm? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 168.251.194.18 (talk) 22:07, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
just thinking. I have gotten more than once the comment, why have you got happy feet toy on your PC. And I think that I am not the only victim of ignorant people (which in turn thought I am retarded as I have not seen a kids film). is there any reference or something funny to put in this article about that? --Squidonius (talk) 12:23, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
Wouldn't the pig latin version of this word, Eumonoultramicroscopicsilicovolcanoconiosispnay be longer? --Luke Farrelly-Spain (talk) 17:59, 20 September 2008 (UTC)
Description: Former courthouse in Decatur, Georgia, where I almost was mugged.
NJWine, we are the choosers of Orville's fate! Plays, poems, tributes, please join me!
Be thy son of Adam or daughter of Eve
God bestowed upon us the power t'grieve
For dearest furry friends flow tears of brine
And inspiration to create artwork most divine:
The helicopter feline
Struck by a car whilst chasing a rat
Orville's owner vowed to create "half machine, half cat"
Disembowled, stuffed, preserved in formaldehyde
Technology made him one sweet flying ride
(And saved on cremation costs as an aside.)
Alas, Orvillecat may not be a lasting tale
Despite fifty citations in the Daily Mail
Translated to myriad languages without fail
(Not to mention eight separate versions in Braille.)
But if we write poems and plays and musical themes,
And perhaps some lolcats and Ceiling Cat cross-memes
Orville, he may, he may yet live on
And we'll google him for centuries a yonder and anon,
And future wikipedians will wonder
Just what drugs we were on.
I dont know if it is true, but i bet it could really happen. Farming vocals (talk) 16:03, 14 May 2017 (UTC)
There where no cars in Jesus's day, so he can't drive, lol 79.112.106.1 (talk) 20:01, 9 June 2011 (UTC)
Objection, irrelevant! 67.70.57.28 (talk) 21:00, 16 October 2014 (UTC)