You'll love this one. Its not a copyvio and its survived VfD once or twice. Its a complete mess, its 164KB long, and theres no way I can take it up. The job is basically tidying up this collection of dumped references, quotes, and the occasional make-sense paragraph. Whoever takes this on, good luck. Hedley 22:47, 4 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- Article is quite long, 64 KB not 164 KB. But it does contain interesting information though.
- peresonally i dont see any problem with this article. it's perfectly readable though admittedly oversize. have read many wikipedia articles and frankly this one is the most informative one i have read here. *Dhar*
- The references in this article don't have enough context to be useful. They need to be turned into footnotes that give full citations, or at least that use intelligible abbreviations. The talk page also contains a gratuitous amount of information. It should probably be moved to one or more subpages, and someone needs to check whether or not any of it still needs processing of some kind. -- Beland 06:29, 7 August 2005 (UTC)
- I started splitting up the article into various parts, but this still needs a lot of work. I will keep working on this, but it is going to be fairly slow. kaal 05:50, 10 August 2005 (UTC)
- Added to User:BaronLarf/Desk to try and get some movement here Stewart Adcock 09:31, 26 September 2005 (UTC)
- Removed from my desk; not my area of expertise. Refined my Cleanup Taskforce listing to show this, as well. --BaronLarf 14:48, 30 September 2005 (UTC)
- Ok - I'll have a stab at this and see what develops, I think the plan must be to go for a rewrite sub page and see if we can get help from some of the editors who made this mess! Andreww 11:05, 13 October 2005 (UTC)
- I will work on this simultaneously with other editors--Vyzasatya 07:59, 16 October 2005 (UTC)
- Considering the fact how this article was (5-6 months back). It has undergone a major surgery and relatively easier to read now. But the content and information in various sections is not well balanced. This is the main anchoring article for the rest of the many Kamobja related articles. I would like to make few suggestions for improvements
- condense information in some sections and expand some sections to bring balance to article. In short we need a bird eye view.
- Logical arrangement of sections so that a section smoothely flows into the next one.
- --Vyzasatya 16:48, 18 February 2006 (UTC)
Closing, looks OK IMHO. RJFJR 13:18, 23 March 2007 (UTC)