- 2026 Turkey tornado outbreak (history · last edit · rewrite) from {{{https://sanliurfa.gov.tr/03052026-tarihli-basin-aciklamasi-202610}}}. WXchaser (Say what?) 16:57, 19 October 2026 (UTC)
- Oppose There isn't a copyright problem as far as I know. This info was taken from ESWD which already includes this source in their reports. ⚡ StormL00ver ⚡ 17:08, 19 October 2026 (UTC)
- @Mesocyclonic93 @Hjalpingers @ELLEWEATHERRRR @Tetradisulfate @Lightbulb Noob ⚡ StormL00ver ⚡ 17:12, 19 October 2026 (UTC)
- @Loaf5979 ⚡ StormL00ver ⚡ 17:15, 19 October 2026 (UTC)
- Wayback Machine link Mesocyclonic93 (t)(c) 17:22, 19 October 2026 (UTC)
- I'm confused, what exactly is copyrighted? Lightbulb Noob (talk) 17:36, 19 October 2026 (UTC)
- I don't know. That is why I am suprised. ⚡ StormL00ver ⚡ 17:38, 19 October 2026 (UTC)
- ESWD has this source in their May 3rd reports so there should be no Copyright issues. ⚡ StormL00ver ⚡ 17:39, 19 October 2026 (UTC)
- I looked at the archived version of it, according to google translate it is talking about flooding or something, and does not even mention tornadoes anywhere. Mesocyclonic93 (t)(c) 17:41, 19 October 2026 (UTC)
- So how could this even result in copyright??? This is just oppening false discussions. ⚡ StormL00ver ⚡ 17:42, 19 October 2026 (UTC)
- This article is about May 3rd Turkey Tornado Outbreak. There isn't even mentioning of floods in this article. ⚡ StormL00ver ⚡ 17:42, 19 October 2026 (UTC)
- Did the text get CnP'd or something? I'm not seeing much of an issue, we could just cite the press release wherever the issues are tetradisulfate 17:44, 19 October 2026 (UTC)
- I looked back into the article and saw no Copy right issue. Possibly false alarm? ⚡ StormL00ver ⚡ 17:46, 19 October 2026 (UTC)
- I looked at the entire page and saw nowhere this could have been an issue, the closest thing I could find were the injury counts but even then it cites a BBC article tetradisulfate 17:50, 19 October 2026 (UTC)
- So, Now What are we going to do exactly? ⚡ StormL00ver ⚡ 17:51, 19 October 2026 (UTC)
- I have no idea. I see no problem here, and if there was an issue with the page history the nominator should have used Template:Copyvio-revdel. Unless the nominator can provide any more details, I think this is a false positive tetradisulfate 18:01, 19 October 2026 (UTC)
- @WXchaser care to elaborate? Lightbulb Noob (talk) 18:22, 19 October 2026 (UTC)
- So, What are we going to do? Is this a false alarm and should we restore the page? ⚡ StormL00ver ⚡ 17:50, 19 October 2026 (UTC)
- @Hjalpingers use four tildes (~~~~) to sign your name on pages where it doesn't do it automatically. It also automatically shows the date. Mesocyclonic93 (t)(c) 18:00, 19 October 2026 (UTC)
- @Lightbulb Noob@Tetradisulfate@Mesocyclonic93 So what are we going to do now? ⚡ StormL00ver ⚡ 18:02, 19 October 2026 (UTC)
- Wait for an administrator to figure something out, I don't know how long that takes tetradisulfate 18:05, 19 October 2026 (UTC)
- So we are going to wait because of a false alarm? Just great -_- ⚡ StormL00ver ⚡ 18:08, 19 October 2026 (UTC)
No vio found, claim cannot be validated. Tag removed from article. Hjalpingers and Guninvalid note that you shouldn't be removing the copyvio tag. Tenshi! (Talk page) 13:15, 20 October 2026 (UTC)
\_ i think yes | you know my name by now 8:53 that timezone that day
- idk why I got pinged here
The hjalp guy idk what day atp 8:40pm eet+2 I think idk (please do not ask how i edited ts)
Hjalpman 18:04, 19 October 2026 (UTC)
- @Hjalpingers What? Also, I just saw it was a 97% CopyVio, and tagged it mb if it caused confusion. WXchaser (Say what?) 18:43, 19 October 2026 (UTC)
