Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2007 July 14

Image:Piusgutenberg.jpg (delete|talk|history|logs) - uploaded by Savidan (notify | contribs).

• Unnecessary non-free image showing a Pontiff examining a book, to illustrate the information that he visited the U.S.. It doesn't seem to add any noteworthy information that isn't already conveyed with text. Abu badali ^(talk) 00:18, 14 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Incorrect nomination. This is a picture of Pacelli while cardinal secretary of state to Pope Pius XI, not a picture from during his pontificate. This is one of the few available images from Pacelli's important trip to the U.S. There is obviously no free equivalent of him examining the Gutenberg bible, or even visiting the famous institution that houses it. His visits to so-called Catholic artifacts are an important part of his trip, and how he interacted with them is something that cannot be communicated in the article text. Savidan 05:56, 14 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Savidan, you seem to misunderstand our policy on non-free content. Replaceability is just one of the 10 criteria. And anyway, an irrepĺaceable image is not one for which there's no equal image under a free license. If an image can be replaced by a completely different one but with the same encyclopedic value, then it's considered replaceable. Even more, if a non-free image can be replaced by a piece of freely licensed text with the same encyclopedic value, then it's still replaceable.

We don't need a free image of Cardinal Pacelli "examining the Gutenberg bible" to replace this one. As this image is only being used to illustrate a discussion about this Cardinal's visit to the U.S., it can be replaced by free text. Indeed, it already is. There's no encyclopedic information in this image that isn't already conveyed with text in the article. --Abu badali ^(talk) 22:21, 14 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Weak delete. Fails NFCC #8. – Quadell ^{(talk) (random)} 01:42, 18 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Piusxiiloggia.jpg (delete|talk|history|logs) - uploaded by Savidan (notify | contribs).

• Unnecessary non-free image showing a Pontif blessing some people. I'm not sure what it it used for (there's no rationale). Abu badali ^(talk) 00:34, 14 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

There was a rationale, and I have augmented it. I don't ask you to take my word for it that this is an iconic image of Pius XII which is undoubtedly tied to the legacy of his papacy. Jose Sanchez, in Pius XII and the Holocaust calls this image, along with Image:Piusxiib.jpg, one of "the two ubiquitous photographs of Pius" which "seemed to capture the papacy at an eternal moment" (p. 1).

• Delete Not really iconic at all. Bleh999 08:43, 14 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

As I said, such determinations should be a question of literature, not personal opinions. Savidan 14:54, 14 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

An iconic image is one the received awards, created some controversy, was influential in some way... i.e., the image itself was commented about in a lot of places, and not simply used in a lot of places. --Abu badali ^(talk) 22:24, 14 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete, violates NFCC #8 – Quadell ^{(talk) (random)} 01:42, 18 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Piusxiiwwi.jpg (delete|talk|history|logs) - uploaded by Savidan (notify | contribs).

• Unnecessary non-free image showing a Pontif handing some packages to some people. It doesn't seem to add any noteworthy information that isn't already conveyed with text. Abu badali ^(talk) 00:37, 14 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Incorrect nomination. The picture is of Pacelli before he was elected pope. It is the only known photo of him during WWI. This picture conveys a lot of information that is impossible to convey is plaintext. The awkwardness or at-ease-ness of Pacelli while handing out packages to WWI prisoners, the role of his religious costume, the people standing behind him, etc. ... these are impossible to write, these can only be shown through this one-of-a-kind historical image. Savidan 05:53, 14 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Not really iconic at all. Bleh999 08:43, 14 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, violates NFCC #8 – Quadell ^{(talk) (random)} 01:42, 18 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:CarolKaye.jpg (delete|talk|history|logs) - uploaded by Bzuk (notify | contribs).

• Image license claims to be a screenshot of public-domain software. However, the image actually appears to be the one here: [4], and there is no indication that the photo is GFDL or public-domain, nor that it even is a software screenshot. The site's general terms of use [5] forbids commercial use and derivative works, making the image unfree. This being the case, the image is of a living person, and so could not be used under fair-use as it is replaceable. — Seraphimblade ^{Talk to me} 00:52, 14 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Pacelli.jpg (delete|talk|history|logs) - uploaded by Jtdirl (notify | contribs).

• Unnecessary non-free image showing a Pontif lying in state, doens't seem to add any noteworthy information that can't be conveyed with text. Abu badali ^(talk) 01:52, 14 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The uploader deleted the image himself, after leaving a (not very educated) message on my talk page. --Abu badali ^(talk) 22:30, 14 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Rihgggbtour.jpg (delete|talk|history|logs) - uploaded by SeanJones101 (notify | contribs).

• Tagged as a CD cover, but it doesn't look like one. It's used in an article about a tour. Is this merely decorative? Is the source (Marketing of SPR / Def Jam Records) sufficient? – Quadell ^{(talk) (random)} 03:00, 14 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:RWDSU_anthony_weiner.jpg (delete|talk|history|logs) - uploaded by Cornellrockey (notify | contribs).

• This image shows a politician being endorced by Union members. I don't think it shows anything essential that text could not convey. – Quadell ^{(talk) (random)} 03:16, 14 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. Simply on the basis of aesthetics, and also, it does not appear to be in violation of any of the policies relating to images. MrPrada 20:06, 16 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:RTBgroup.jpg (delete|talk|history|logs) - uploaded by Jcmurphy (notify | contribs).

• Photo of existing band, used decoratively I would say – Quadell ^{(talk) (random)} 03:20, 14 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Rainbowrail.jpg (delete|talk|history|logs) - uploaded by Andyhi18 (notify | contribs).

• I can't really tell what's going on here, but I think this non-free image is being used decoratively. – Quadell ^{(talk) (random)} 03:25, 14 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:SOfRome_EU_PS2ad.jpg (delete|talk|history|logs) - uploaded by 0836whimper (notify | contribs).

• Ad poster, used decoratively – Quadell ^{(talk) (random)} 03:58, 14 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:SFFFposter05.jpg (delete|talk|history|logs) - uploaded by Downsjn (notify | contribs).

• Non-free festival poster, used decoratively in gallery without comment – Quadell ^{(talk) (random)} 04:02, 14 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:2006draft.jpg (delete|talk|history|logs) - uploaded by Downsjn (notify | contribs).

• Non-free festival poster, used decoratively in gallery without comment – Quadell ^{(talk) (random)} 04:02, 14 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:SFFFposter04.jpg (delete|talk|history|logs) - uploaded by Downsjn (notify | contribs).

• Non-free festival poster, used decoratively in gallery without comment – Quadell ^{(talk) (random)} 04:03, 14 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:SFFFposter03.jpg (delete|talk|history|logs) - uploaded by Downsjn (notify | contribs).

• Non-free festival poster, used decoratively in gallery without comment – Quadell ^{(talk) (random)} 04:03, 14 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:SFFFposter02.jpg (delete|talk|history|logs) - uploaded by Downsjn (notify | contribs).

• Non-free festival poster, used decoratively in gallery without comment – Quadell ^{(talk) (random)} 04:03, 14 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Peace_map.gif (delete|talk|history|logs) - uploaded by Iron2000 (notify | contribs).

• Replaceable, low quality, not English – Quadell ^{(talk) (random)} 04:19, 14 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:StockDayAd.jpg (delete|talk|history|logs) - uploaded by Habsfannova (notify | contribs).

• this doesn't show anything that can't be written in the article, invalid fair use Bleh999 06:06, 14 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep, it is the screenshot of an "attack ad" alleging that a federal candidate "doesn't support rape victims", the ad was specifically designed to trigger gut reactions to its colouring, wording, use of bold font and similar "scare tactics" - something that simply saying "there were ads on television" doesn't really capture. Sherurcij ^{(Speaker for the Dead)} 18:43, 14 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. In theory, Sherurcij's arguments make sense. But this ad is just text, plus a rather neutral photo. – Quadell ^{(talk) (random)} 01:45, 18 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. Ability to assess the form and impactfulness of the design adds to the reader's understanding. Jheald 22:24, 18 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted. Jheald would have a point if the article in fact had mentioned the form and design and whatnot. howcheng {chat} 17:19, 19 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• I'm sorry, but I think this image is important to fully show how the Canadian Liberals made a campaign issue out of Day's past comments in the 2000 election, which is not understood so fully just from text. The attack ads that this illustration encapsulates are the story here, in an election where "few if any" other important issues were raised. Note also the legal fair use case here (which does influence Wikipedia's policy balance, though it is only part of the story) is particularly strong here, because of the minimal market value of the work now and the recognised specific public value of informing debate on political affairs. For all these reasons, this should be reopened. Furthermore, it was premature to make this one of the first tickets on this page to be closed, when it was still the subject of active discussion. Jheald 18:10, 19 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Reopened by request. Per my earlier closing comments, I say delete. This is a typical political attack ad, not unlike the hundred million others aired during election season, so I don't see how this really imparts any information that isn't already conveyed in the article. Furthermore, the text in the ad (which is barely readable in the image) could be quoted in the article if in fact there is an intention to highlight the tactics his opponents used. howcheng {chat} 23:28, 19 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Putin-beslan-school-hostage-crisis.jpg (delete|talk|history|logs) - uploaded by Aivazovsky (notify | contribs).

• You don't need an image of Vladimar Putin in this article, it shows nothing beyond identification of the subject Bleh999 06:14, 14 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep, one of a number of nominations by Bleh999 showcasing his attempts to delete a large number of fair use images related to international terrorism, though improper rationale and flawed reasoning. This is not just "an image of Putin" as he claims, it is an image of Putin on state-controlled television (so no commercial loss) addressing the nation after 300 people were killed in the most notable terrorist attack in Asia in the past decade. (Beslan school hostagetaking). Sherurcij ^{(Speaker for the Dead)} 18:41, 14 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • I suggest you tone down your personal attacks and review the policy WP:NPA, I nominate images to review or dispute their fair use, and not just terrorism related articles, and I don't care for your baseless accusations. Maybe you should read the wikipedia fair use policy WP:NFC, this image fails #1 #2 #3 #8 , no free equivalent for a living subject. why do we need a photograph of Vladimir Putin behind the state flag, it doesn't add anything that any image of Vladimir Putin would. Russian media certainly do have commercial interests and we respect them as we do CNN, NBC or Fox news. Bleh999 04:50, 15 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • We already have a selection of free images of Vladimir Putin on http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Vladimir_Putin Bleh999 09:04, 15 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, utterly replaceable. – Quadell ^{(talk) (random)} 01:58, 18 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'd argue that a "random image of Putin" is not a suitable replacement for Putin on national television addressing the nation after a massive terrorist attack. Sherurcij ^{(Speaker for the Dead)} 05:42, 18 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep per above comment of SherurcijTaprobanus 14:30, 18 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Retechtag.jpg (delete|talk|history|logs) - uploaded by Retech (notify | contribs).

• deleted article about a non notable art form, therefore the image is not needed — -- lucasbfr ^talk 10:45, 14 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Retechchair1.jpg (delete|talk|history|logs) - uploaded by Retech (notify | contribs).

• deleted article about a non notable art form, therefore the image is not needed — -- lucasbfr ^talk 10:45, 14 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Retechtable1.jpg (delete|talk|history|logs) - uploaded by Retech (notify | contribs).

• deleted article about a non notable art form, therefore the image is not needed — -- lucasbfr ^talk 10:45, 14 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Retechlamp1.jpg (delete|talk|history|logs) - uploaded by Retech (notify | contribs).

• deleted article about a non notable art form, therefore the image is not needed — -- lucasbfr ^talk 10:45, 14 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Andre_Dallaire.jpg (delete|talk|history|logs) - uploaded by Sherurcij (notify | contribs).

• Fair use & permission only for a living subject Bleh999 11:23, 14 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep, the copyright holder has agreed that our use of the image is perfect "fair use", who are you to argue with them? It is the only known image of the man, and perfectly fits all criteria of fair use. Sherurcij ^{(Speaker for the Dead)} 18:25, 14 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. It may legally be fair use, but it fails NFCC #1, doesn't it? – Quadell ^{(talk) (random)} 01:58, 18 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The copyright holder to the image agrees that it satisfies Fair Use, that's a strong argument in favour of it fitting Fair Use. Sherurcij ^{(Speaker for the Dead)} 05:45, 18 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It does satisfy "fair use law", legally, in the U.S. It does not satisfy our non-free content criteria. – Quadell ^{(talk) (random)} 12:18, 18 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Amish-paradise.jpg (delete|talk|history|logs) - uploaded by Sherurcij (notify | contribs).

• Not needed fair use images Bleh999 11:25, 14 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep, since the subject of the article is a parody, the visual scenes clarify the setting and tone that is parodying the original. Sherurcij ^{(Speaker for the Dead)} 18:24, 14 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. It shows things words alone could not, and is used in a section about the video. – Quadell ^{(talk) (random)} 01:58, 18 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. As it stands right now, none of the scenes depicted are discussed in the article text. Recommend replacement with something that is described, such as the part where the barn falls down on Weird Al (especially as that one is specifically mentioned as being a Buster Keaton homage). howcheng {chat} 19:41, 18 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Ahmad_Ghany.jpg (delete|talk|history|logs) - uploaded by Sherurcij (notify | contribs).

• Unfree image solely used for identification of a living subject. Bleh999 11:30, 14 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• can be deleted, the only one of Bleh999's nominations which makes sense, this image if not replaceable today, will likely be replaceable in the future once court-ordered publication bans of trial proceedings is lifted. Sherurcij ^{(Speaker for the Dead)} 18:37, 14 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Assem_Hammoud.jpg (delete|talk|history|logs) - uploaded by Sherurcij (notify | contribs).

• non free image solely used for identification of living subject Bleh999 11:32, 14 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep, it's a Lebanese Federal Police mugshot of a convicted terrorist, perfectly fits the criteria of fair use since it is of low resolution and represents zero possibility of financial loss to the booking officer who took the photo. Sherurcij ^{(Speaker for the Dead)} 18:29, 14 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Why do we need 2 fair use images of the same subject in the same article used solely for identification of a living subject? Bleh999

• Keep one of the two images of him. He is certainly not available for photographs, so the subject is non-replaceable. But two images are not needed. – Quadell ^{(talk) (random)} 02:00, 18 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Kzz.jpg (delete|talk|history|logs) - uploaded by Sasazumo (notify | contribs).

• Listed source for file is inaccurate, also photo appears to be a professional copyrighted photo, and no fair use rationale is attached. Also believe GFDL licensing was added to make it appear the photo met Wiki-standards — Ebyabe 14:44, 14 July 2007 (UTC).[reply]

Image:Seie0879r.jpg (delete|talk|history|logs) - uploaded by DanMS (notify | contribs).

• Orphan, not needed. I originally uploaded this image to illustrate the article Submarine Escape Immersion Equipment, but then I found a couple of better ones. This one is no longer needed. ●DanMS • Talk 15:25, 14 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Lance.SAG.jpg (delete|talk|history|logs) - uploaded by Gayingr (notify | contribs).

• Source and fair use rationale not listed, untagged warning being removed to circumvent this. — Ebyabe 16:52, 14 July 2007 (UTC).[reply]

Image:Black_bulbul.JPG (delete|talk|history|logs) - uploaded by Prasadshikhare (notify | contribs).

• Orphaned, Low quality, Absent uploader Nv8200p talk 18:46, 14 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:BlackPS3Bright.png (delete|talk|history|logs) - uploaded by Ex-Nintendo Employee (notify | contribs).

• Orphaned, Absent uploader, Redundant with Image:PS3 at CEATEC 2006 (vertical).jpg on Commons. Nv8200p talk 18:49, 14 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Videmus_Omnia_2.JPG (delete|talk|history|logs) - uploaded by Videmus Omnia (notify | contribs).

• Uploader-requested deletion. Videmus Omnia ^Talk 18:50, 14 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Blackbox-lg.png (delete|talk|history|logs) - uploaded by Msalciccia (notify | contribs).

• Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, Source link dead. Nv8200p talk 18:51, 14 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Foo_Fighters_13.JPG (delete|talk|history|logs) - uploaded by CaptainMoho (notify | contribs).

• CV - Image is a copyrighted photo taken from FooFighters.com and falsely tagged GFDL. — ChrisB 18:58, 14 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• I added the copyright violation notice to this page. ●DanMS • Talk 22:21, 14 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Foo_Figters_Page2.jpg (delete|talk|history|logs) - uploaded by CaptainMoho (notify | contribs).

• CV - Image is a copyrighted photo taken from FooFighters.com and falsely tagged GFDL. — ChrisB 19:04, 14 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• I added the copyright violation notice to this page. ●DanMS • Talk 22:22, 14 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Blake_telling_him_self!!!=shes_cute!.jpg (delete|talk|history|logs) - uploaded by Blakelewis ishott (notify | contribs).

• Orphaned, Copyright violation, Absent uploader Nv8200p talk 19:10, 14 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:BlastText.png (delete|talk|history|logs) - uploaded by Vidicom (notify | contribs).

• Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, Absent uploader, User's only upload. Nv8200p talk 19:18, 14 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Blender3D_GlassSuzannes.jpg (delete|talk|history|logs) - uploaded by 1983 (notify | contribs).

• Orphan, No encyclopedic context. -Nv8200p talk 19:23, 14 July 2007 (UTC) Nv8200p talk 19:23, 14 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Blimp.jpg (delete|talk|history|logs) - uploaded by Roffo (notify | contribs).

• Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, Au, User's only upload. Nv8200p talk 19:26, 14 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Blind_Bake_2007_dt.jpg (delete|talk|history|logs) - uploaded by Eatfood (notify | contribs).

• Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Nv8200p talk 19:27, 14 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Blingeee.jpg (delete|talk|history|logs) - uploaded by Youngfresh99 (notify | contribs).

• Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, User's only upload Nv8200p talk 19:27, 14 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Image:UC-smile.jpg (delete|talk|history|logs) - uploaded by [[User talk:#Image:Image:UC-smile.jpg listed for deletion|]] ([ notify] | contribs).

• Orphaned, unencyclopaedic, seems to illustrate nothing. — Exploding Boy 20:02, 14 July 2007 (UTC).[reply]

Image:Block_Fort_Map.jpg (delete|talk|history|logs) - uploaded by Wxy (notify | contribs).

• Orphaned, Copyright violation Nv8200p talk 20:20, 14 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Block_of_12_units_in_Queen_St_in_Goodna.jpg (delete|talk|history|logs) - uploaded by Goodstone (notify | contribs).

• Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Nv8200p talk 20:21, 14 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Block_of_16_townhouses_in_Alice_St_at_Goodna.jpg (delete|talk|history|logs) - uploaded by Goodstone (notify | contribs).

• Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Nv8200p talk 20:21, 14 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Blogit.PNG (delete|talk|history|logs) - uploaded by Jjoseph (notify | contribs).

• Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, Absent uploader Nv8200p talk 20:23, 14 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Blooming.jpg (delete|talk|history|logs) - uploaded by Radvanyi (notify | contribs).

• Orphaned, Absent uploader, User's only upload Nv8200p talk 20:26, 14 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Blue_and_White_Porcelain_Joseon_Jar.jpg (delete|talk|history|logs) - uploaded by MVCOL (notify | contribs).

• Orphaned, Absent uploader, Watermarked Nv8200p talk 20:28, 14 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Blue-trucks.jpg (delete|talk|history|logs) - uploaded by Workcycles (notify | contribs).

• Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, Absent uploader Nv8200p talk 20:31, 14 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Blueballs.gif (delete|talk|history|logs) - uploaded by Floaterfluss (notify | contribs).

• Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, Possible Copyright violation Nv8200p talk 20:32, 14 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Blueheeler_squirt.jpg (delete|talk|history|logs) - uploaded by Jmootz20 (notify | contribs).

• Orphaned, Absent uploader Nv8200p talk 20:33, 14 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Bluepav.jpg (delete|talk|history|logs) - uploaded by Jjhaldane (notify | contribs).

• Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, Absent uploader Nv8200p talk 20:34, 14 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Bluered_normal.jpg (delete|talk|history|logs) - uploaded by Keusta (notify | contribs).

• Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, Absent uploader Nv8200p talk 20:35, 14 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Blueribbon3-1-.gif (delete|talk|history|logs) - uploaded by Xlalaine (notify | contribs).

• Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, Absent uploader Nv8200p talk 20:35, 14 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Bluestembistro.jpg (delete|talk|history|logs) - uploaded by Carpzor (notify | contribs).

• Orphaned, Low quality, Unencyclopedic Nv8200p talk 20:36, 14 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Blugrassryman1.jpg (delete|talk|history|logs) - uploaded by Soad fan000000000 (notify | contribs).

• Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Nv8200p talk 20:37, 14 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:PaulCoxBlue.jpg (delete|talk|history|logs) - uploaded by Stonkin (notify | contribs).

• Orphaned SchuminWeb (Talk) 20:39, 14 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Slowdownbabysweden.jpeg (delete|talk|history|logs) - uploaded by Wneedham02 (notify | contribs).

• The uploader states that the image, which has an XtinaWeb.org watermark, was self-made, is in the public domain, and is the cover of the Swedish single. Seems quite unlikely. — 17Drew 20:44, 14 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Bmhs.jpg (delete|talk|history|logs) - uploaded by Adaml212 (notify | contribs).

• Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, Absent uploader Nv8200p talk 20:48, 14 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. unless a location for this image can be found. WikipedianProlific^(Talk) 19:42, 15 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Bmorant2006.jpg (delete|talk|history|logs) - uploaded by Crcar2 (notify | contribs).

• Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, Absent uploader Nv8200p talk 20:49, 14 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Ohmother.JPG (delete|talk|history|logs) - uploaded by Wneedham02 (notify | contribs).

• Somehow, I doubt that a self-made image will be used as the cover for a single that doesn't even appear to exist. — 17Drew 20:54, 14 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Board_Logo.PNG (delete|talk|history|logs) - uploaded by BOARD UK (notify | contribs).

• Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, Absent uploader Nv8200p talk 21:01, 14 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Board300x300.jpg (delete|talk|history|logs) - uploaded by Supercooldude280 (notify | contribs).

• Orphaned, Copyright violation, Absent uploader Nv8200p talk 21:01, 14 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Bobbejaan_schoepen_en_louis_baret_in_pub_with_no_beer.jpg (delete|talk|history|logs) - uploaded by Peeper (notify | contribs).

• Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, Absent uploader Nv8200p talk 21:16, 14 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Bobbi_Bacha_Peeking_out_of_Lucas_Office_at_Blue_Moon_Investigations.jpg (delete|talk|history|logs) - uploaded by Bluemoonpi (notify | contribs).

• Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Nv8200p talk 21:18, 14 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Bodhananda_Swamikal.jpg (delete|talk|history|logs) - uploaded by Aaroamal (notify | contribs).

• Orphaned, Not sure why it was uploaded. Nv8200p talk 21:25, 14 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Kindly leave it alone, the associated article is being completed for uploading shortly.Aaroamal 10:10, 15 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Bodyandsoul.png (delete|talk|history|logs) - uploaded by Addmclean (notify | contribs).

• Low quality, Copyright violation - copyrighted image fails WP:NFCC#8. Nv8200p talk 21:30, 14 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Bodyaxes.jpg (delete|talk|history|logs) - uploaded by Junglefowl (notify | contribs).

• Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, Absent uploader Nv8200p talk 21:31, 14 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Boisetrees2.jpg (delete|talk|history|logs) - uploaded by Cutlerite (notify | contribs).

• Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, Absent uploader Nv8200p talk 21:34, 14 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• This image is a duplicate of Image:Boisetrees.jpg and could be safely deleted. ●DanMS • Talk 22:54, 14 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:9deenerofence.jpg (delete|talk|history|logs) - uploaded by Radioheadhst (notify | contribs).

• Image is claimed to be famous, but this claim is not sourced. Anyway the image is used to illustrate a discussion about the event depicted, the never mentions the image's notability. Also, source information is incomplete. Abu badali ^(talk) 21:36, 14 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:BolsaMexicanaDeValores.jpg (delete|talk|history|logs) - uploaded by Jsramos (notify | contribs).

• Orphaned, Absent uploader, User's only upload. Nv8200p talk 21:39, 14 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Boltonboi_transparent.gif (delete|talk|history|logs) - uploaded by Boltonboi69 (notify | contribs).

• Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, Absent uploader Nv8200p talk 21:40, 14 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:BombardierDSC_0236.jpg (delete|talk|history|logs) - uploaded by YellowstoneGal (notify | contribs).

• Orphaned, Absent uploader, Conflicting summary and license Nv8200p talk 21:41, 14 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Bon_Sejour_Crescent_Panache_Sorceress.jpg (delete|talk|history|logs) - uploaded by Panachehh (notify | contribs).

• Orphaned, Absent uploader, No evidence uploader has authority to release under the GFDL. Nv8200p talk 21:42, 14 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:BondageAngelLarge.JPG (delete|talk|history|logs) - uploaded by DollieLlama (notify | contribs).

• Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, Absent uploader Nv8200p talk 21:43, 14 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Added attribution and license on page for image (Photo by my husband, ThornDaddy. Used with permission. Uploaded under Creative Commons Share and Share Alike license.) As for "Unencyclopedic" .,...I uploaded this to use on my user page. Does a user page have to be encyclopedic? I feel this is an image that represents me, as a wikipedia user, well. DollieLlama 06:42, 16 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Bondet.jpg (delete|talk|history|logs) - uploaded by Tomhamilton14 (notify | contribs).

• Orphaned, Low quality, Unencyclopedic Nv8200p talk 21:44, 14 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Flagpres.jpg (delete|talk|history|logs) - uploaded by Radioheadhst (notify | contribs).

• Taggeds as a "scan of a newspaper page or article used to illustrate the article or issue in question", but it's just a copyrghted picture being used to illustrate the event depicted on the image. No information on the copyright holder. Abu badali ^(talk) 21:49, 14 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Bonny.jpg (delete|talk|history|logs) - uploaded by Idiot american (notify | contribs).

• Orphaned, Ue, Watermark Nv8200p talk 21:55, 14 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Bonus_pickles.jpg (delete|talk|history|logs) - uploaded by Jlangston (notify | contribs).

• Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, Absent uploader Nv8200p talk 21:56, 14 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Currentlogo.gif (delete|talk|history|logs) - uploaded by Monka HQ (notify | contribs).

• Orphaned vanity image, apparently used on the speedied page Monka Studios. - ∅ (∅), 22:14, 14 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Currentlogo.png (delete|talk|history|logs) - uploaded by Monka HQ (notify | contribs).

• Orphaned vanity image, apparently used on the speedied page Monka Studios. - ∅ (∅), 22:14, 14 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Logo2.png (delete|talk|history|logs) - uploaded by Monka HQ (notify | contribs).

• Orphaned vanity image, apparently used on the speedied page Monka Studios. - ∅ (∅), 22:14, 14 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Logo3.png (delete|talk|history|logs) - uploaded by Monka HQ (notify | contribs).

• Orphaned vanity image, apparently used on the speedied page Monka Studios. - ∅ (∅), 22:14, 14 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:FingerChux.JPG (delete|talk|history|logs) - uploaded by BrownsFanForLife (notify | contribs).

• Description says "Copyright: None" but the image is tagged with {{Copyrighted}}. —Remember the dot ^(talk) 23:02, 14 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I overlooked that; the mistake has now been corrected BrownsFanForLife 23:05, 14 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:TAL_poster.jpg (delete|talk|history|logs) - uploaded by Stavros1 (notify | contribs).

• Pretty, but non-free and used decoratively – Quadell ^{(talk) (random)} 23:28, 14 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:TR_Great_White_FleetSails.JPG (delete|talk|history|logs) - uploaded by SimonATL (notify | contribs).

• This is a nice painting (from 1977) of the Great White Fleet, used to identify the Great White Fleet. I think this violates our criteria – Quadell ^{(talk) (random)} 23:35, 14 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Unless explained I see no reason for deletion? The isn't orhpaned and is relevant to the article it is in. So unless its copyright I see no reasoning. WikipedianProlific^(Talk) 19:40, 15 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Let me explain. It is relevant and used, as you say. But our first non-free content criterion requires that an image be non-replaceable in order for us to use it. Anyone could create a painting of this historical event and freely license it, so we can't use a non-free painting to illustrate the event. – Quadell ^{(talk) (random)} 03:01, 17 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]