Wikipedia:WikiProject Computer science/Collaboration of the Week/History

Computer Science

Nominated February 7; needs 6 votes by February 21 (minimum 3 votes per week)

Support:

1. Gflores ^Talk 22:39, 7 February 2006 (UTC)
2. Allan McInnes (talk) 23:26, 7 February 2006 (UTC)
3. Mgreenbe 23:56, 7 February 2006 (UTC)
4. — Dzonatas 00:23, 8 February 2006 (UTC)
5. —Ruud 00:50, 8 February 2006 (UTC)
6. -- ^Evanx(tag?) 08:19, 12 February 2006 (UTC)

Comments:

• Now that [a consensus over the definition has been established], work can begin to improve this article. An overview of the fields (instead of a list) can be done on each CS field, similar to Math. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gflores (talk • contribs)
• In contrast of content easily based on centric academia, a broaded range of information about CS is needed. If this article is to be featured or even accredited someday, its needs to be a wealth of knowledge about CS to any audience. This article can serve to incubate sections that can become full length articles, indeed. Add a section-stub. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dzonatas (talk • contribs)

Programming language

Nominated June 04; needs 3 votes by June 11 (minimum 3 votes per week)

Support:

1. Ideogram 22:03, 4 June 2006 (UTC)]
2. ZeWrestler ^Talk 19:07, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
3. Jaxad0127 21:44, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
4. CG 14:35, 25 June 2006 (UTC)

Comments:

• A fundamental concept in computer science of interest to a wide audience. One of the first articles anyone new to computer science should read; let's put our best foot forward.

It's official, now lets get to work. Ideogram 23:20, 5 June 2006 (UTC)

Computer Security

Nominated 2 August; needs 3 votes by 9 August

Support:

1. J Morgan^(talk) 23:32, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
2. Raanoo 04:37, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
3. ZeWrestler ^Talk 13:11, 9 August 2006 (UTC)

Comments:

• This is a large but confusing article whose content is central to computer science and will only become more so in the future. I would like to see it become a clearer, more friendly article with subarticles instead of just a huge collection of links. --J Morgan^(talk) 23:32, 2 August 2006 (UTC)