diffhistSerbian Progressive Party05:28+219Opostylovtalkcontribs(returning the ideology and position removed without an explanation. all these are covered in detail in prose below now, so no need to give sources in the infobox; "big tent" implies a left-wing current)
diffhistThe Wall Street Journal02:35−4,430Bill Williamstalkcontribs(WP:BOLD and WP:NOTNEWS. Every single source, but one, that is cited for this "controversy" is from the day or two after it occurred. Reliable sources do not emphasize this as an actual controversy, simply a mistake in journalism, which WSJ has made many times, as have all other major news organizations. This belongs in the charlie kirk article, where it is located, but not here.)Tag: Visual edit