Faujdar

Mir Jafar was the Mughal Faujdar of Orissa until the year 1747.

Faujdar was an office of the Mughal Empire that combined military, judicial and land revenue functions. The term "faujdar" has pre-Mughal origins. During those times, the term referred to a military officer but did not refer to a specific rank. With the administrative reforms of Mughal emperor Akbar, this rank was systemised. It constituted an independent administrative unit and its territorial limits varied from place to place and from time to time.

A faujdari (district) comprised a number of thanas (military outposts). At each of these, a number of sowars (soldiers) were stationed under a thanadar (chief). Each faujdari carried with it a fixed number of sawars, and it was up to the faujdar to station soldiers in the various thanas under him.

In addition, in some faujdaris, there were a number of thanas described as حضورِی, huzuri or حضورِی مشروطِی, huzuri mashruti. In these thanas, the thanadars were appointed directly by the central government via royal orders or at the recommendations of the Nizam or Diwan of the province. Such thanadars were, to a considerable degree, independent officers, who could receive orders directly from the central government. They were probably placed under the overall supervision of the faujdar and were expected to cooperate with him in maintaining law and order. They were created to ensure an efficient check on ambitious faujdars.

In an emergency, the faujdar of a charge could be called upon to enforce imperial regulations.

They were appointed by virtue of a royal order and the appointment bore the seal of the Bakshi ul Mulki. They received orders directly from the Emperor and submitted petitions directly to the court. Transfer was a well established practice.

Duties

Generally, a faujdar's military and police duties included:

His judicial functions were:

His revenue administration functions were:

See also

References

  1. ↑ Alam & Subrahmanyam 1998, p. 251.
  2. ↑ Alam & Subrahmanyam 1998, p. 236.
  3. ↑ Alam & Subrahmanyam 1998, p. 243.
  4. ↑ Alam & Subrahmanyam 1998, pp. 243–244.
  5. ↑ Alam & Subrahmanyam 1998, p. 244.
  6. ↑ Alam & Subrahmanyam 1998, p. 245.
  7. ↑ Alam & Subrahmanyam 1998, pp. 246–247.
  8. ↑ Alam & Subrahmanyam 1998, pp. 248–249.
  9. ↑ Alam & Subrahmanyam 1998, p. 250.

Sources