Problemet är delvis löst. Vissa anser att det har bevisats vara omöjligt att bevisa avsaknad av motsägelser i ett axiomatiskt system med en ändlig mängd axiom. Se Gödels ofullständighetsteorem.
Dawson, John W. (2006) "Shaken foundations or groundbreaking realignment? A Centennial Assessment of Kurt Gödel’s Impact on Logic, Mathematics, and Computer Science". 2006 21st Annual IEEE Symposium on Logic in Computer Science, IEEE, pp.339–341. ISBN 0-7695-2631-4doi:10.1109/LICS.2006.47
Michael Detlefsen(1990).”On an alleged refutation of Hilbert's Program using Gödel's First Incompleteness Theorem”.Journal of Philosophical Logic(Springer)19(4): sid.343–377. doi:10.1007/BF00263316.
Torkel Franzen (2005), Godel's theorem: An Incomplete Guide to its Use and Abuse, A.K. Peters, Wellesley MA. ISBN 1-56881-238-8
Gerhard Gentzen (1936). "Die Widerspruchsfreiheit der reinen Zahlentheorie." Mathematische Annalen, v. 112, pp.493–565.
David Hilbert [1900] (1901) "Mathematische Probleme". Archiv der Mathematik und Physik, v. 3 n. 1, pp.44–63 and 213–237. English translation, Maby Winton, Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society 8 (1902), 437–479. Available online at http://aleph0.clarku.edu/~djoyce/hilbert/problems.html .
George Kreisel(1976). "What have we learnt from Hilbert's second problem?". Mathematical developments arising from Hilbert problems (Proc. Sympos. Pure Math., Northern Illinois Univ., De Kalb, Ill.,): 93–130, Providence, R. I.:Amer. Math. Soc..
Nagel, Ernest and Newman, James R., Godel's Proof, New York University Press, 1958.
William W. Tait (2005). "Gödel's reformulation of Gentzen's first consistency proof of arithmetic: the no-counterexample interpretation." Bulletin of Symbolic Logic v. 11 n. 2, pp.225–238.